Literature DB >> 24927498

Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jessica A Adams1, Tamara S Galloway1, Debapriya Mondal1, Sandro C Esteves2, Fiona Mathews3.   

Abstract

Mobile phones are owned by most of the adult population worldwide. Radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from these devices could potentially affect sperm development and function. Around 14% of couples in high- and middle-income countries have difficulty conceiving, and there are unexplained declines in semen quality reported in several countries. Given the ubiquity of mobile phone use, the potential role of this environmental exposure needs to be clarified. A systematic review was therefore conducted, followed by meta-analysis using random effects models, to determine whether exposure to RF-EMR emitted from mobile phones affects human sperm quality. Participants were from fertility clinic and research centres. The sperm quality outcome measures were motility, viability and concentration, which are the parameters most frequently used in clinical settings to assess fertility. We used ten studies in the meta-analysis, including 1492 samples. Exposure to mobile phones was associated with reduced sperm motility (mean difference -8.1% (95% CI -13.1, -3.2)) and viability (mean difference -9.1% (95% CI -18.4, 0.2)), but the effects on concentration were more equivocal. The results were consistent across experimental in vitro and observational in vivo studies. We conclude that pooled results from in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that mobile phone exposure negatively affects sperm quality. Further study is required to determine the full clinical implications for both sub-fertile men and the general population.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility; Mobile or cell phone; Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation; Sperm concentration; Sperm motility; Sperm viability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24927498     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  38 in total

Review 1.  Environmental Toxins and Male Fertility.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mima; David Greenwald; Samuel Ohlander
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The use of cell phone and insight into its potential human health impacts.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim; Ehsanul Kabir; Shamin Ara Jahan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Frequency of the resonance of the human sweat duct in a normal mode of operation.

Authors:  Saroj R Tripathi; Paul Ben Ishai; Kodo Kawase
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Combined effects of varicocele and cell phones on semen and hormonal parameters.

Authors:  Ingrid Schauer; Badereddin Mohamad Al-Ali
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Self-reported mobile phone use and semen parameters among men from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; John D Meeker; Paige L Williams; Gabor Mezei; Jennifer B Ford; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 6.  Engaging practicing gynecologists in the management of infertile men.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Alaa Hamada; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-11-05

7.  Proteomic analysis of continuous 900-MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in testicular tissue: a rat model of human cell phone exposure.

Authors:  Masood Sepehrimanesh; Nasrin Kazemipour; Mehdi Saeb; Saeed Nazifi; Devra Lee Davis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  The potential adverse effect of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation on the testes of prenatally exposed peripubertal male rats.

Authors:  Sandra Andrašková; Katarína Holovská; Zuzana Ševčíková; Zuzana Andrejčáková; Štefan Tóth; Marcela Martončíková; Enikö Račeková; Viera Almášiová
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 9.  Male infertility and somatic health - insights into lipid damage as a mechanistic link.

Authors:  Nathan D Burke; Brett Nixon; Shaun D Roman; John E Schjenken; Jessica L H Walters; R John Aitken; Elizabeth G Bromfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 16.430

10.  Male cellular telephone exposure, fecundability, and semen quality: results from two preconception cohort studies.

Authors:  E E Hatch; S K Willis; A K Wesselink; E M Mikkelsen; M L Eisenberg; G J Sommer; H T Sorensen; K J Rothman; L A Wise
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.