Literature DB >> 24925754

Prospectively measured 10-year changes in health-related quality of life and comparison with cross-sectional estimates in a population-based cohort of adult women and men.

Wilma M Hopman1, Claudie Berger, Lawrence Joseph, Wei Zhou, Jerilynn C Prior, Tanveer Towheed, Tassos Anastassiades, Jonathan D Adachi, David A Hanley, Emmanuel A Papadimitropoulos, Susan Kirkland, Stephanie M Kaiser, Robert G Josse, David Goltzman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) over 10 years, by age and sex, and to compare measured within-person change to estimates of change based on cross-sectional data.
METHODS: Participants in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study completed the 36-item short form (SF-36) in 1995/1997 and 2005/2007. Mean within-person changes for domain and summary components were calculated for men and women separately, stratified by 10-year age groups. Projected changes based on published age- and sex-stratified cross-sectional data were also calculated. Mean differences between the two methods were then estimated, along with the 95 % credible intervals of the differences.
RESULTS: Data were available for 5,569/9,423 (59.1 %) of the original cohort. Prospectively collected 10-year changes suggested that the four physically oriented domains declined in all but the youngest group of men and women, with declines in the elderly men exceeding 25 points. The four mentally oriented domains tended to improve over time, only showing substantial declines in vitality and role emotional in older women, and all four domains in older men. Cross-sectional estimates identified a similar pattern of change but with a smaller magnitude, particularly in men. Correspondence between the two methods was generally high.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in HRQOL may be minimal over much of the life span, but physically oriented HRQOL can decline substantially after middle age. Although clinically relevant declines were more evident in prospectively collected data, differences in 10-year age increments of cross-sectional data may be a reasonable proxy for longitudinal changes, at least in those under 65 years of age. Results provide additional insight into the natural progression of HRQOL in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925754      PMCID: PMC5112024          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0733-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  21 in total

Review 1.  SF-36 health survey update.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Interpretation of quality-of-life outcomes: issues that affect magnitude and meaning.

Authors:  M A Testa
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals.

Authors:  Angela M Wood; Ian R White; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift.

Authors:  Frans J Oort; Mechteld R M Visser; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Cross-cultural comparisons of the content of SF-36 translations across 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

Authors:  A K Wagner; B Gandek; N K Aaronson; C Acquadro; J Alonso; G Apolone; M Bullinger; J Bjorner; S Fukuhara; S Kaasa; A Leplège; M Sullivan; S Wood-Dauphinee; J E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  D E Beaton; S Hogg-Johnson; C Bombardier
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life outcomes measures.

Authors:  E M Andresen; A R Meyers
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Stability of normative data for the SF-36: results of a three-year prospective study in middle-aged Canadians.

Authors:  Wilma M Hopman; Claudie Berger; Lawrence Joseph; Tanveer Towheed; Elizabeth vandenKerkhof; Tassos Anastassiades; Ann Cranney; Jonathan D Adachi; George Loannidis; Suzette Poliquin; Jacques P Brown; Timothy M Murray; David A Hanley; Emmanuel A Papadimitropoulos; Alan Tenenhouse
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

9.  Five-year stability in associations of health-related quality of life measures in community-dwelling older adults: the Rancho Bernardo Study.

Authors:  Claudia Der-Martirosian; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Is the SF-36 a valid measure of change in population health? Results from the Whitehall II Study.

Authors:  H Hemingway; M Stafford; S Stansfeld; M Shipley; M Marmot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Norwegian reference values for the Short-Form Health Survey 36: development over time.

Authors:  Ellisiv L Jacobsen; Asta Bye; Nina Aass; Sophie D Fosså; Kjersti S Grotmol; Stein Kaasa; Jon Håvard Loge; Torbjørn Moum; Marianne J Hjermstad
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Health-related quality of life of younger and older lower-income households in Malaysia.

Authors:  Hussein Rizal; Mas Ayu Said; Hazreen Abdul Majid; Tin Tin Su; Tan Maw Pin; Rozmi Ismail; Mohd Azlan Shah Zaidi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Reduced health-related quality of life among Japanese college students with visual impairment.

Authors:  Iguchi Masaki
Journal:  Biopsychosoc Med       Date:  2015-08-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.