Literature DB >> 24925671

Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees.

Vibhor Agrawal1, Robert S Gailey2, Ignacio A Gaunaurd2, Christopher O'Toole3, Adam Finnieston4, Ronald Tolchin5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative effectiveness of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees, who function at different Medicare Functional Classification Levels, has not been published.
OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in symmetry in external work between four categories of prosthetic feet in K-Level-2 and K-Level-3 unilateral transtibial amputees during ramp ascent and descent. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized repeated-measures trial.
METHODS: Ten subjects completed six testing sessions during which symmetry in external work was calculated using F-scan in-sole sensors. Between testing sessions 1 and 2, subjects received standardized functional prosthetic training. In Sessions 3-6, subjects tested four feet--solid ankle cushion heel, stationary attachment flexible endoskeleton, Talux (categories K1, K2, and K3, respectively), and Proprio-Foot (microprocessor ankle)--using a study socket and had a 10- to 14-day accommodation period with each foot.
RESULTS: During ramp descent, K-Level-2 subjects demonstrated higher symmetry in external work values with Talux and Proprio-Foot compared to the solid ankle cushion heel foot. K-Level-3 subjects also had higher symmetry in external work values with the Talux foot than the solid ankle cushion heel foot. Ramp ascent symmetry in external work values were not significantly different between feet.
CONCLUSIONS: Prosthetic foot category appears to influence symmetry in external work more during decline walking than incline walking. K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees achieve greater symmetry from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle and microprocessor ankles while descending ramps. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees benefit from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle. These results support the prescription of K3 feet for K-Level-2 amputees who frequently negotiate ramps. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics of prosthetic/orthotic devices; biomechanics; gait; gait analysis; physiotherapy; prosthetic feet; prosthetics; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925671     DOI: 10.1177/0309364614536762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  Design and Validation of a Semi-Active Variable Stiffness Foot Prosthesis.

Authors:  Evan M Glanzer; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 5): Impact of five common prosthetic ankle-foot categories for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation.

Authors:  Shane R Wurdeman; Phillip M Stevens; James H Campbell
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2019-02-13

3.  STEPFORWARD study: a randomised controlled feasibility trial of a self-aligning prosthetic ankle-foot for older patients with vascular-related amputations.

Authors:  Natalie Vanicek; Elizabeth Coleman; Judith Watson; Kerry Bell; Catriona McDaid; Cleveland Barnett; Martin Twiste; Fergus Jepson; Abayomi Salawu; Dennis Harrison; Natasha Mitchell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.

Authors:  Michael Ernst; Björn Altenburg; Thomas Schmalz; Andreas Kannenberg; Malte Bellmann
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  A low-cost easily implementable physiotherapy intervention clinically improves gait implying better adaptation to lower limb prosthesis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Leticia Vargas Almeida; Claudiane Arakaki Fukuchi; Tania Emi Sakanaka; Alberto Cliquet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Microprocessor-Controlled Prostheses for a Bilateral Transtibial Amputee with Gait Analysis and Satisfaction: A 1-Year Followup Case Report.

Authors:  Jong Hu Jeon; Hee Seung Yang; Pyoung-Hwa Choi; Eui Jin Ahn; Woo Sob Sim; Dong Young Ahn; Jin Yang Kim; Seul Bin Na Lee; Min Jo; Min Hee Cho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Maura E Eveld; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Steven Barr; Tracey E Howe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-23

9.  Self-aligning prosthetic device for older patients with vascular-related amputations: protocol for a randomised feasibility study (the STEPFORWARD study).

Authors:  Natasha Mitchell; Elizabeth Coleman; Judith Watson; Kerry Bell; Catriona McDaid; Cleveland Barnett; Martin Twiste; Fergus Jepson; Abayomi Salawu; Dennis Harrison; Natalie Vanicek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.