Literature DB >> 24925222

GNAS is frequently mutated in both low-grade and high-grade disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasms but does not affect survival.

Aatur D Singhi1, Jon M Davison1, Haroon A Choudry2, James F Pingpank2, Steven A Ahrendt2, Matthew P Holtzman2, Amer H Zureikat2, Herbert J Zeh2, Lekshmi Ramalingam2, Geeta Mantha1, Marina Nikiforova1, David L Bartlett2, Reetesh K Pai3.   

Abstract

We analyzed a series of 55 disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasms treated at our institution for GNAS and KRAS mutations in an attempt to correlate mutation status with clinicopathological findings and patient survival. GNAS mutations (p.R201H, c.602G>A and p.R201C, and c.602C>T) were identified in 17 (31%) of 55 of disseminated mucinous neoplasms and were found in 8 (35%) of 23 low-grade mucinous neoplasms, 7 (37%) of 19 high-grade mucinous adenocarcinomas lacking a signet ring cell component, and 2 (15%) of 13 high-grade mucinous adenocarcinomas with a signet ring cell component. All 7 mucinous adenocarcinomas composed of pure (>95%) signet ring cells harbored wild-type GNAS. There was no significant association between GNAS mutations and sex and age (both with P > .05) or between GNAS mutations and individual adverse histologic features including cytologic grade, destructive invasion, tumor cellularity, angiolymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, and signet ring cells (all with P > .05). KRAS mutations were identified in 22 (40%) of 55 disseminated mucinous neoplasms. GNAS-mutated disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasms more frequently harbored concurrent KRAS mutations compared with GNAS wild-type tumors (65% versus 29%, P = .018). GNAS mutations were not significantly associated with overall survival (both with P > .05). Only overall tumor grade was an independent predictor of overall survival in the multivariate analysis (P = .01). Our results indicate that GNAS mutations are frequently identified in both low-grade and high-grade disseminated appendiceal mucinous neoplasms indicating that GNAS mutation status cannot be used to distinguish between low-grade from high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendix; Disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis; GNAS; Low-grade mucinous neoplasm; Mucinous adenocarcinoma; Peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis; Pseudomyxoma peritonei

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24925222     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  14 in total

1.  Molecular Profiling of Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma and Comparison with Right-sided and Left-sided Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ryuma Tokunaga; Joanne Xiu; Curtis Johnston; Richard M Goldberg; Philip A Philip; Andreas Seeber; Madiha Naseem; Jae Ho Lo; Hiroyuki Arai; Francesca Battaglin; Alberto Puccini; Martin D Berger; Shivani Soni; Wu Zhang; Jimmy J Hwang; Anthony F Shields; John L Marshall; Hideo Baba; W Michael Korn; Heinz-Josef Lenz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Omics analyses in peritoneal metastasis-utility in the management of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a narrative review.

Authors:  Christin Lund-Andersen; Annette Torgunrud; Karianne Giller Fleten; Kjersti Flatmark
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

3.  Genomic Landscape of Appendiceal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Celina S-P Ang; John Paul Shen; Camille J Hardy-Abeloos; Justin K Huang; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Miriam T Jacobs; Ingrid L Chen; David Xu; Siraj M Ali; Joel Baumgartner; Andrew Lowy; Paul Fanta; Trey Ideker; Sherri Z Millis; Olivier Harismendy
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-08-08

4.  GNAS gene mutation may be present only transiently during colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Peter Zauber; Stephen P Marotta; Marlene Sabbath-Solitare
Journal:  Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet       Date:  2016-03-23

Review 5.  [The activating GNAS mutation : A survey of fibrous dysplasia, its associated syndromes, and other skeletal and extraskeletal lesions].

Authors:  H Ostertag; S Glombitza
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.011

6.  Molecular profiling of appendiceal serrated lesions, polyps and mucinous neoplasms: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Giada Munari; Gianluca Businello; Paola Mattiolo; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Matteo Fassan; Gianmaria Pennelli; Marta Sbaraglia; Chiara Borga; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Gaya Spolverato; Claudia Mescoli; Francesca Galuppini; Antonio Sommariva; Elena Bellan; Sara Lonardi; Fotios Loupakis; Claudio Luchini
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Targeting G-protein coupled receptor-related signaling pathway in a murine xenograft model of appendiceal pseudomyxoma peritonei.

Authors:  Ashok K Dilly; Brendon D Honick; Yong J Lee; Zong S Guo; Herbert J Zeh; David L Bartlett; Haroon A Choudry
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-06

8.  Usefulness of a management protocol for patients with cervical multicystic lesions: A retrospective analysis of 94 cases and the significance of GNAS mutation.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ando; Tsutomu Miyamoto; Hiroyasu Kashima; Akiko Takatsu; Keiko Ishii; Yasunari Fujinaga; Tanri Shiozawa
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Clinical Benefit from Trametinib in a Patient with Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma with a GNAS R201H Mutation.

Authors:  Celina Ang; Aryeh Stollman; Hongfa Zhu; Umut Sarpel; Bethann Scarborough; Gagan Sahni; Sherri Z Millis
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2017-06-22

10.  The curious case of Gαs gain-of-function in neoplasia.

Authors:  Giulio Innamorati; Thomas M Wilkie; Havish S Kantheti; Maria Teresa Valenti; Luca Dalle Carbonare; Luca Giacomello; Marco Parenti; Davide Melisi; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.