Literature DB >> 24925011

Seasonal variations in habitat selection and spatial distribution of wild boar (Sus Scrofa) in the Camargue, Southern France.

M Dardaillon1.   

Abstract

Seasonal habitat selection and use by wild boars were studied in relation to major vegetation cover types and flooded areas, on a sampling area of 1047 ha. Six habitat types were delineated: "sansouire" (local name), "enganes" (local name), halophytic grasslands, scrub grasslands, deep and shallow marshes, fallow or cultivated farmlands. Once a season in 1982, this sampling area was systematically examined and mapped for wild boar signs left in the following places : bedding places, farrowing nests, wallows, rubbing trees and rooting sites. Marshes are the most frequently used areas throughout the year since all activities can be conducted there. Scrub grasslands, although less common, are also important, because of scrubs of Phillyrea angustifolia used for resting and dense groves of Ulmus campestris used for rubbing. Rooting activity, predominantly done in marshes, is also conducted in all types of grasslands (even cultivated) during the winter, and in farmlands during the summer. In the sampling area, seasonal variations in the counts of activity signs as well as in the number of wild boar sightings suggest correlated variations of density. The estimated autumn to spring density is higher (2.5-2.9 animals/km2) than the summer one (0.6 animals/km2). These seasonal variations are explained by spatial adjustments according to environmental conditions. In the early warm season, drying out of marshes and soils in the study area leads to emigration of part of population onto neighbouring grounds where agricultural crops are available. Return movements are presumably causally related to different factors : onset of the rains, hunting disturbance and harvest of crops. Fluctuations of environmental factors require a flexible strategy of habitat utilization. We propose a model for the organization of wild boar populations, which would be formed by "nuclei" presenting environment-dependent densities.
Copyright © 1986. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 24925011     DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(86)90088-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  6 in total

1.  Wild boars as spore dispersal agents of ectomycorrhizal fungi: consequences for community composition at different habitat types.

Authors:  Stav Livne-Luzon; Yael Avidan; Gil Weber; Hen Migael; Thomas Bruns; Ofer Ovadia; Hagai Shemesh
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Exotic mammals disperse exotic fungi that promote invasion by exotic trees.

Authors:  Martin A Nuñez; Jeremy Hayward; Thomas R Horton; Guillermo C Amico; Romina D Dimarco; M Noelia Barrios-Garcia; Daniel Simberloff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Accounting for detection unveils the intricacy of wild boar and rabbit co-occurrence patterns in a Mediterranean landscape.

Authors:  Ana Luísa Barros; Gonçalo Curveira-Santos; Tiago André Marques; Margarida Santos-Reis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape.

Authors:  Franz Johann; Markus Handschuh; Peter Linderoth; Carsten F Dormann; Janosch Arnold
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.964

5.  Factors and costs associated with removal of a newly established population of invasive wild pigs in Northern U.S.

Authors:  Justin W Fischer; Nathan P Snow; Bradley E Wilson; Scott F Beckerman; Christopher N Jacques; Eric H VanNatta; Shannon L Kay; Kurt C VerCauteren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Woodland caribou habitat selection patterns in relation to predation risk and forage abundance depend on reproductive state.

Authors:  Rebecca Viejou; Tal Avgar; Glen S Brown; Brent R Patterson; Doug E B Reid; Arthur R Rodgers; Jennifer Shuter; Ian D Thompson; John M Fryxell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.