BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combined hormone replacement therapy with oestrogens plus the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. However, the mechanisms of this pro-thrombotic effect are largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to: (i) compare the pro-thrombotic effect of MPA with another synthetic progestin, norethisterone acetate (NET-A), (ii) determine if MPA's pro-thrombotic effect can be antagonized by the progesterone and glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone and (iii) elucidate underlying mechanisms by comparing aortic gene expression after chronic MPA with that after NET-A treatment. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Female apolipoprotein E-deficient mice were ovariectomized and treated with placebo, MPA, a combination of MPA + mifepristone or NET-A for 90 days on a Western-type diet. Arterial thrombosis was measured in vivo in a photothrombosis model. Aortic gene expression was analysed using microarrays; GeneOntology and KEGG pathway analyses were conducted. KEY RESULTS: MPA's pro-thrombotic effects were prevented by mifepristone, while NET-A did not affect arterial thrombosis. Aortic gene expression analysis showed, for the first time, that gestagens induce similar effects on a set of genes potentially promoting thrombosis. However, in NET-A-treated mice other genes with potentially anti-thrombotic effects were also affected, which might counterbalance the effects of the pro-thrombotic genes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The pro-thrombotic effects of synthetic progestins appear to be compound-specific, rather than representing a class effect of gestagens. Furthermore, the different thrombotic responses elicited by MPA and NET-A might be attributed to a more balanced, 'homeostatic' gene expression induced in NET-A- as compared with MPA-treated mice.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Combined hormone replacement therapy with oestrogens plus the synthetic progestin medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. However, the mechanisms of this pro-thrombotic effect are largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to: (i) compare the pro-thrombotic effect of MPA with another synthetic progestin, norethisterone acetate (NET-A), (ii) determine if MPA's pro-thrombotic effect can be antagonized by the progesterone and glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone and (iii) elucidate underlying mechanisms by comparing aortic gene expression after chronic MPA with that after NET-A treatment. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Female apolipoprotein E-deficientmice were ovariectomized and treated with placebo, MPA, a combination of MPA + mifepristone or NET-A for 90 days on a Western-type diet. Arterial thrombosis was measured in vivo in a photothrombosis model. Aortic gene expression was analysed using microarrays; GeneOntology and KEGG pathway analyses were conducted. KEY RESULTS:MPA's pro-thrombotic effects were prevented by mifepristone, while NET-A did not affect arterial thrombosis. Aortic gene expression analysis showed, for the first time, that gestagens induce similar effects on a set of genes potentially promoting thrombosis. However, in NET-A-treated mice other genes with potentially anti-thrombotic effects were also affected, which might counterbalance the effects of the pro-thrombotic genes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The pro-thrombotic effects of synthetic progestins appear to be compound-specific, rather than representing a class effect of gestagens. Furthermore, the different thrombotic responses elicited by MPA and NET-A might be attributed to a more balanced, 'homeostatic' gene expression induced in NET-A- as compared with MPA-treated mice.
Authors: Arnaud Bonnefoy; Kim Daenens; Hendrik B Feys; Rita De Vos; Petra Vandervoort; Jos Vermylen; Jack Lawler; Marc F Hoylaerts Journal: Blood Date: 2005-10-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michelle M McCormick; Farid Rahimi; Yuri V Bobryshev; Katharina Gaus; Hala Zreiqat; Hong Cai; Reginald S A Lord; Carolyn L Geczy Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-10-10 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Ross L Prentice; JoAnn E Manson; Lieling Wu; David Barad; Vanessa M Barnabei; Marcia Ko; Andrea Z LaCroix; Karen L Margolis; Marcia L Stefanick Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeff S Isenberg; Martin J Romeo; Christine Yu; Christine K Yu; Khauh Nghiem; Jude Monsale; Margaret E Rick; David A Wink; William A Frazier; David D Roberts Journal: Blood Date: 2007-09-21 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Madge R Vickers; Alastair H MacLennan; Beverley Lawton; Deborah Ford; Jeannett Martin; Sarah K Meredith; Bianca L DeStavola; Sally Rose; Anthony Dowell; Helen C Wilkes; Janet H Darbyshire; Tom W Meade Journal: BMJ Date: 2007-07-11