| Literature DB >> 24923550 |
Qifeng Ma, Man Wu, Wenfeng Pei, Haijing Li, Xingli Li, Jinfa Zhang, Jiwen Yu1, Shuxun Yu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The cotton (Gossypium spp.) fiber cell is an important unicellular model for studying cell differentiation. There is evidence suggesting that phosphorylation is a critical post-translational modification involved in regulation of a wide range of cell activities. Nevertheless, the sites of phosphorylation in G. hirsutum and their regulatory roles in fiber cell initiation are largely unknown. In this study, we employed a mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics to conduct a global and site-specific phosphoproteome profiling between ovules of a fuzzless-lintless (fl) Upland cotton (G. hirsutum) mutant and its isogenic parental wild type (WT) at -3 and 0 days post-anthesis (DPA).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24923550 PMCID: PMC4070576 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Numbers of phosphoproteins, phosphopeptides, and phosphorylation sites identified in this study
| Listing | Number |
|---|---|
| Phosphoproteins | 619 |
| Phosphopeptides | 830 |
| Phosphopeptides (single:doubleness:mulriple) | 277:401:152 |
| Phosphorylation sites | 1592 |
| Phosphorylation sites (Ser:Thr:Tyr) | 1423:151:18 |
Comparison of conserved phosphosites in cotton and species in the P DB database
| Number of phosphorylation sites | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservation of phosphosites (%) | Phosphosites in 9 species counterparts | ||
| Described (%) | Undescribed (%) | ||
| pS | 759 (86.7) | 436 (88.6) | 323 (84.3) |
| pT | 105 (12.0) | 50 (10.2) | 55 (14.4) |
| pY | 11 (1.3) | 6 (1.2) | 5 (1.3) |
| All | 875 (100) | 492 (56.2) | 383 (43.8) |
Figure 1Conservation of phosphosites between cotton proteins and homologs in nine other plant species. Phosphosites identified in this study are indicated in red; previously identified phosphosites are represented by lower-case blue letters. A: Phosphosites conserved across the plant 60s acidic ribosomal protein P0 (RPLP0). B: Phosphosites conserved across the plant phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK). C: Phosphosites conserved across the plant Rho GTPase activation protein (RhoGAP).
Location of phosphorylation sites on characterized phosphoprotein domains
| Number of phosphorylation sites | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfam domain | Total (%) | ||
| ON (%) | OUT (%) | ||
| pS | 284 (26.4) | 792 (73.6) | 1076 (100) |
| pT | 37 (31.9) | 79 (68.1) | 116 (100) |
| pY | 4 (22.2) | 14 (77.8) | 18 (100) |
| All | 325 (26.9) | 885 (73.1) | 1210 (100) |
Figure 2Distribution of phosphoprotein Gene Ontology functional classifications. BP: biological process, CC: Cellular component, MF: molecular function.
Figure 3WebLogo analysis of identified phosphorylation sites and extraction-enriched phosphorylation motifs. A: Frequency distribution of amino acid residues surrounding phosphorylation sites at positions -6 to +6. B: Motifs extracted from the phosphopeptide dataset.
The description of the identified phosphorylation motifs
| NO | Cotton motif | Novel or not | Motif pattern | Motif class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ......SP..... | No | sP | Pro-directed |
| 2 | ......SD.E… | No | sX[D/E] | Acidic |
| 3 | ......SDD.... | Novel | sX[D/E] | Acidic |
| 4 | ......SD.D… | No | sX[D/E] | Acidic |
| 5 | ......SE.E… | No | sX[D/E] | Acidic |
| 6 | ......S.D.E.. | No | sXX[D/E] | Acidic |
| 7 | ....DDS...... | Novel | [D/E]s | Acidic |
| 8 | ......S..DD.. | Novel | sXX[D/E] | Acidic |
| 9 | ......S.....X | No | unknown | unknown |
| 10 | .....DS...... | No | [D/E]s | Acidic |
| 11 | …R..S...... | No | RXXs | Basic |
| 12 | ......SD.S… | Novel | s[D/E] | Acidic |
| 13 | ......S.D.... | No | sX[D/E] | Acidic |
| 14 | ......SE..... | Novel | s[D/E] | Acidic |
| 15 | ......S.SP… | No | unknown | unknown |
| 16 | ......SS..... | Novel | unknown | unknown |
| 17 | …S..S...... | Novel | unknown | unknown |
| 18 | ......TP..... | No | unknown | unknown |
| 19 | ......T.D.... | Novel | unknown | unknown |
Figure 4Summary of differentially phosphorylated proteins identified in this study. A: Number of phosphoproteins differentially expressed during fiber development within and between WT and fl ovules. Numbers above and below arrows denote numbers of phosphoproteins differentially expressed for the specified comparison. For example, between stages -3 and 0 DPA in the WT, 44 phosphoproteins were up-regulated (red) and 22 were down-regulated (blue) at 0 DPA. Similarly, between WT and fl at -3 DPA, 4 phosphoproteins were up-regulated and 8 phosphoproteins were down-regulated in the WT. B: Numbers at column-row intersections are the number of differentially phosphorylated proteins common to the four tissues. C: Venn diagram showing the number of differentially phosphorylated proteins shared between phosphoproteomes of the different four tissues.