Literature DB >> 24923193

Validated finite element analyses of WaveOne Endodontic Instruments: a comparison between M-Wire and NiTi alloys.

N Bonessio1, E S J Pereira, G Lomiento, A Arias, M G A Bahia, V T L Buono, O A Peters.   

Abstract

AIM: To validate torsional analysis, based on finite elements, of WaveOne instruments against in vitro tests and to model the effects of different nickel-titanium (NiTi) materials.
METHODOLOGY: WaveOne reciprocating instruments (Small, Primary and Large, n = 8 each, M-Wire) were tested under torsion according to standard ISO 3630-1. Torsional profiles including torque and angle at fracture were determined. Test conditions were reproduced through Finite Element Analysis (FEA) simulations based on micro-CT scans at 10-μm resolution; results were compared to experimental data using analysis of variance and two-sided one sample t-tests. The same simulation was performed on virtual instruments with identical geometry and load condition, based on M-Wire or conventional NiTi alloy.
RESULTS: Torsional profiles from FEA simulations were in significant agreement with the in vitro results. Therefore, the models developed in this study were accurate and able to provide reliable simulation of the torsional performance. Stock NiTi files under torsional tests had up to 44.9%, 44.9% and 44.1% less flexibility than virtual M-Wire files at small deflections for Small, Primary and Large instruments, respectively. As deflection levels increased, the differences in flexibility between the two sets of simulated instruments decreased until fracture. Stock NiTi instruments had a torsional fracture resistance up to 10.3%, 8.0% and 7.4% lower than the M-Wire instruments, for the Small, Primary and Large file, respectively.
CONCLUSION: M-Wire instruments benefitted primarily through higher material flexibility while still at low deflection levels, compared with conventional NiTi alloy. At fracture, the instruments did not take complete advantage of the enhanced fractural resistance of the M-Wire material, which determines only limited improvements of the torsional performance.
© 2014 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite Element Analysis; M-Wire alloy; fracture resistance; nickel-titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24923193     DOI: 10.1111/iej.12333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  9 in total

1.  Influence of Cross-Section and Pitch on the Mechanical Response of NiTi Endodontic Files under Bending and Torsional Conditions-A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Victor Roda-Casanova; Antonio Pérez-González; Alvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Vicente Faus-Matoses
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Preference of undergraduate students after first experience on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.

Authors:  Sang Won Kwak; Gary Shun-Pan Cheung; Jung-Hong Ha; Sung Kyo Kim; Hyojin Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2016-06-23

3.  Evaluation of the Fractured Surface of Five Endodontic Rotary Instruments: A Metallurgical Study.

Authors:  Mohsen Aminsobhani; Mohamad Saleh Khalatbari; Naghmeh Meraji; Abdollah Ghorbanzadeh; Ehsan Sadri
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2016

4.  Influence of Operator's Experience on the Shaping Ability of Protaper Universal and Waveone Systems: A Comparative Study on Simulated Root Canals.

Authors:  Giuseppe Troiano; Mario Dioguardi; Armando Cocco; Giovanni Giannatempo; Luigi Laino; Domenico Ciavarella; Elio Berutti; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-10-07

Review 5.  Rotary science and its impact on instrument separation: A focused review.

Authors:  Sandhya Anand Khasnis; Prem Prakash Kar; Apoorva Kamal; Jayaprakash D Patil
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

6.  Root canal volume change and transportation by Vortex Blue, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Universal in curved root canals.

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Park; Min-Seock Seo; Young-Mi Moon
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2017-12-24

7.  Does adding an instrument after root preparation with Reciproc® R25 increase bacterial reduction?

Authors:  Fernando Soveral D'aviz; Ana Paula Farina; Matheus Albino Souza; Doglas Cecchin
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 May-Jun

8.  Fracture and deformation of ProTaper Next instruments after clinical use.

Authors:  Gema Fernández-Pazos; Benjamín Martín-Biedma; Purificación Varela-Patiño; Manuel Ruíz-Piñón; Pablo Castelo-Baz
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-11-01

Review 9.  Present status and future directions: Canal shaping.

Authors:  Ana Arias; Ove A Peters
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.165

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.