Mari-Lynn Drainoni1, Meg Sullivan, Shwetha Sequeira, Janine Bacic, Katherine Hsu. 1. From the *Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA; †Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; ‡Center for Health Quality, Outcomes & Economic Research, ENRM Veterans Administration Hospital, Bedford, MA; §Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; ¶Division of STD Prevention & HIV/AIDS Surveillance, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Jamaica Plain, MA; and ∥Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the Affordable Care Act era, no-cost-to-patient publicly funded sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics have been challenged as the standard STI care delivery model. This study examined the impact of removing public funding and instituting a flat fee within an STI clinic under state-mandated insurance coverage. METHODS: Cross-sectional database analysis examined changes in visit volumes, demographics, and payer mix for 4 locations in Massachusetts' largest safety net hospital (STI clinic, primary care [PC], emergency department [ED], obstetrics/gynecology [OB/GYN] for 3 periods: early health reform implementation, reform fully implemented but public STI clinic funding retained, termination of public funding and institution of a US$75 fee in STI clinic for those not using insurance). RESULTS: Sexually transmitted infection visits decreased 20% in STI clinic (P < 0.001), increased 107% in PC (P < 0.001), slightly decreased in ED, and did not change in OB/GYN. The only large demographic shift observed was in the sex of PC patients--women comprised 51% of PC patients seen for STI care in the first time period, but rose sharply to 70% in the third time period (P < 0.0001). After termination of public funding, 50% of STI clinic patients paid flat fee, 35% used public insurance, and 15% used private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory insurance, public funding loss, and institution of a flat STI clinic fee were associated with overall decreases in STI visit volume, with significant STI clinic visit decreases and PC STI visit increases. This may indicate partial shifting of STI services into PC. Half of STI clinic patients chose to pay the flat fee even after reform was fully implemented.
BACKGROUND: In the Affordable Care Act era, no-cost-to-patient publicly funded sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinics have been challenged as the standard STI care delivery model. This study examined the impact of removing public funding and instituting a flat fee within an STI clinic under state-mandated insurance coverage. METHODS: Cross-sectional database analysis examined changes in visit volumes, demographics, and payer mix for 4 locations in Massachusetts' largest safety net hospital (STI clinic, primary care [PC], emergency department [ED], obstetrics/gynecology [OB/GYN] for 3 periods: early health reform implementation, reform fully implemented but public STI clinic funding retained, termination of public funding and institution of a US$75 fee in STI clinic for those not using insurance). RESULTS: Sexually transmitted infection visits decreased 20% in STI clinic (P < 0.001), increased 107% in PC (P < 0.001), slightly decreased in ED, and did not change in OB/GYN. The only large demographic shift observed was in the sex of PC patients--women comprised 51% of PC patients seen for STI care in the first time period, but rose sharply to 70% in the third time period (P < 0.0001). After termination of public funding, 50% of STI clinic patients paid flat fee, 35% used public insurance, and 15% used private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Mandatory insurance, public funding loss, and institution of a flat STI clinic fee were associated with overall decreases in STI visit volume, with significant STI clinic visit decreases and PC STI visit increases. This may indicate partial shifting of STI services into PC. Half of STI clinic patients chose to pay the flat fee even after reform was fully implemented.
Authors: Madeline C Montgomery; Julia Raifman; Amy S Nunn; Thomas Bertrand; A Ziggy Uvin; Theodore Marak; Jaime Comella; Alexi Almonte; Philip A Chan Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Beth E Meyerson; Alissa Davis; Hilary Reno; Laura T Haderxhanaj; M Aaron Sayegh; Megan K Simmons; Gurprit Multani; Lindsey Naeyaert; Audra Meador; Bradley P Stoner Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Harry Jin; Brandon D L Marshall; Julia Raifman; Madeline Montgomery; Michaela A Maynard; Philip A Chan Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Amelia Greiner Safi; Jamie Perin; Andrea Mantsios; Christina Schumacher; C Patrick Chaulk; Jacky M Jennings Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Karen W Hoover; Bradley W Parsell; Jami S Leichliter; Melissa A Habel; Guoyu Tao; William S Pearson; Thomas L Gift Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Arlene C Seña; Jeannette Y Lee; Jane Schwebke; Susan S Philip; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Anne M Rompalo; Robert L Cook; Marcia M Hobbs Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 9.079