Literature DB >> 24921006

Value of a newly sequenced bacterial genome.

Eudes Gv Barbosa1, Flavia F Aburjaile1, Rommel Tj Ramos1, Adriana R Carneiro1, Yves Le Loir1, Jan Baumbach1, Anderson Miyoshi1, Artur Silva1, Vasco Azevedo1.   

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have made high-throughput sequencing available to medium- and small-size laboratories, culminating in a tidal wave of genomic information. The quantity of sequenced bacterial genomes has not only brought excitement to the field of genomics but also heightened expectations that NGS would boost antibacterial discovery and vaccine development. Although many possible drug and vaccine targets have been discovered, the success rate of genome-based analysis has remained below expectations. Furthermore, NGS has had consequences for genome quality, resulting in an exponential increase in draft (partial data) genome deposits in public databases. If no further interests are expressed for a particular bacterial genome, it is more likely that the sequencing of its genome will be limited to a draft stage, and the painstaking tasks of completing the sequencing of its genome and annotation will not be undertaken. It is important to know what is lost when we settle for a draft genome and to determine the "scientific value" of a newly sequenced genome. This review addresses the expected impact of newly sequenced genomes on antibacterial discovery and vaccinology. Also, it discusses the factors that could be leading to the increase in the number of draft deposits and the consequent loss of relevant biological information.

Keywords:  Computational tools; Drafts; Next-generation sequencing; Omics; Prokaryotic genomes

Year:  2014        PMID: 24921006      PMCID: PMC4050110          DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v5.i2.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Biol Chem        ISSN: 1949-8454


  60 in total

Review 1.  Why is big Pharma getting out of antibacterial drug discovery?

Authors:  Steven J Projan
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 2.  Where will new antibiotics come from?

Authors:  Christopher Walsh
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Third-generation sequencing fireworks at Marco Island.

Authors:  David J Munroe; Timothy J R Harris
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  Use of genomics to select antibacterial targets.

Authors:  Michael J Pucci
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  The bacterial pan-genome and reverse vaccinology.

Authors:  H Tettelin
Journal:  Genome Dyn       Date:  2009-08-19

Review 6.  Challenges of antibacterial discovery.

Authors:  Lynn L Silver
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Nucleotide sequence of the ugp genes of Escherichia coli K-12: homology to the maltose system.

Authors:  P Overduin; W Boos; J Tommassen
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 8.  Reverse vaccinology in the 21st century: improvements over the original design.

Authors:  Claudio Donati; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  DNA sequences of promoter regions for rRNA operons rrnE and rrnA in E. coli.

Authors:  H A de Boer; S F Gilbert; M Nomura
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Finished bacterial genomes from shotgun sequence data.

Authors:  Filipe J Ribeiro; Dariusz Przybylski; Shuangye Yin; Ted Sharpe; Sante Gnerre; Amr Abouelleil; Aaron M Berlin; Anna Montmayeur; Terrance P Shea; Bruce J Walker; Sarah K Young; Carsten Russ; Chad Nusbaum; Iain MacCallum; David B Jaffe
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genome Sequence of Corynebacterium ulcerans Strain 210932.

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius Canário Viana; Leandro de Jesus Benevides; Diego Cesar Batista Mariano; Flávia de Souza Rocha; Priscilla Carolinne Bagano Vilas Boas; Edson Luiz Folador; Felipe Luiz Pereira; Fernanda Alves Dorella; Carlos Augusto Gomes Leal; Alex Fiorini de Carvalho; Artur Silva; Siomar de Castro Soares; Henrique Cesar Pereira Figueiredo; Vasco Azevedo; Luis Carlos Guimarães
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-11-26

2.  Draft Genome Sequence of Mycobacterium ulcerans S4018 Isolated from a Patient with an Active Buruli Ulcer in Benin, Africa.

Authors:  Stanimir Kambarev; Stéphane Corvec; Annick Chauty; Estelle Marion; Laurent Marsollier; Frédéric Pecorari
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2017-04-27

3.  WiseScaffolder: an algorithm for the semi-automatic scaffolding of Next Generation Sequencing data.

Authors:  Gregory K Farrant; Mark Hoebeke; Frédéric Partensky; Gwendoline Andres; Erwan Corre; Laurence Garczarek
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Genome Sequence of Corynebacterium ulcerans Strain FRC11.

Authors:  Leandro de Jesus Benevides; Marcus Vinicius Canário Viana; Diego César Batista Mariano; Flávia de Souza Rocha; Priscilla Carolinne Bagano; Edson Luiz Folador; Felipe Luiz Pereira; Fernanda Alves Dorella; Carlos Augusto Gomes Leal; Alex Fiorini Carvalho; Siomar de Castro Soares; Adriana Carneiro; Rommel Ramos; Edgar Badell-Ocando; Nicole Guiso; Artur Silva; Henrique Figueiredo; Vasco Azevedo; Luis Carlos Guimarães
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-03-12

5.  Genomic repeats, misassembly and reannotation: a case study with long-read resequencing of Porphyromonas gingivalis reference strains.

Authors:  Luis Acuña-Amador; Aline Primot; Edouard Cadieu; Alain Roulet; Frédérique Barloy-Hubler
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.