| Literature DB >> 24921006 |
Eudes Gv Barbosa1, Flavia F Aburjaile1, Rommel Tj Ramos1, Adriana R Carneiro1, Yves Le Loir1, Jan Baumbach1, Anderson Miyoshi1, Artur Silva1, Vasco Azevedo1.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have made high-throughput sequencing available to medium- and small-size laboratories, culminating in a tidal wave of genomic information. The quantity of sequenced bacterial genomes has not only brought excitement to the field of genomics but also heightened expectations that NGS would boost antibacterial discovery and vaccine development. Although many possible drug and vaccine targets have been discovered, the success rate of genome-based analysis has remained below expectations. Furthermore, NGS has had consequences for genome quality, resulting in an exponential increase in draft (partial data) genome deposits in public databases. If no further interests are expressed for a particular bacterial genome, it is more likely that the sequencing of its genome will be limited to a draft stage, and the painstaking tasks of completing the sequencing of its genome and annotation will not be undertaken. It is important to know what is lost when we settle for a draft genome and to determine the "scientific value" of a newly sequenced genome. This review addresses the expected impact of newly sequenced genomes on antibacterial discovery and vaccinology. Also, it discusses the factors that could be leading to the increase in the number of draft deposits and the consequent loss of relevant biological information.Keywords: Computational tools; Drafts; Next-generation sequencing; Omics; Prokaryotic genomes
Year: 2014 PMID: 24921006 PMCID: PMC4050110 DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v5.i2.161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Biol Chem ISSN: 1949-8454