Corné van Walbeek1, Lerato Shai2. 1. School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa Economics of Tobacco Control Project, Southern African Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa. 2. School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tobacco industry claims that illicit cigarette trade in South Africa is high and rising. This is often used as an argument not to increase the tobacco excise tax or to regulate tobacco products. OBJECTIVES: To determine how the tobacco industry's estimates of the size of the illicit cigarette market have changed over time. METHODS: Published media articles were obtained from South African Press Cuttings; published articles and press releases were sourced from the internet. The period of interest is 1990-2012. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2012 we found 90 newspaper articles and press statements that emphasised the tobacco industry's view on illicit trade. Articles that reported on action taken against illicit trade were excluded. Between 2006 and early 2011 the Tobacco Institute of Southern Africa, a body representing the interests of large cigarette companies, reported that South Africa's illicit cigarette market share was 20%. This share increased to 25% in late 2011 and 30% in 2012. In a 2012 presentation by Tobacco Institute of Southern Africa to National Treasury the illicit market share in 2008 was indicated as 7.9%, compared with claims in that year that the illicit market share was 20%. Industry findings that the illicit market decreased in 2007 and 2008 were not reported in the press. CONCLUSIONS: The tobacco industry has adjusted previous estimates of the illicit trade share downwards to create the impression that illicit trade is high and rising. If previous estimates by the tobacco industry were incorrect the credibility of current estimates should be questioned. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: The tobacco industry claims that illicit cigarette trade in South Africa is high and rising. This is often used as an argument not to increase the tobacco excise tax or to regulate tobacco products. OBJECTIVES: To determine how the tobacco industry's estimates of the size of the illicit cigarette market have changed over time. METHODS: Published media articles were obtained from South African Press Cuttings; published articles and press releases were sourced from the internet. The period of interest is 1990-2012. RESULTS: Between 1990 and 2012 we found 90 newspaper articles and press statements that emphasised the tobacco industry's view on illicit trade. Articles that reported on action taken against illicit trade were excluded. Between 2006 and early 2011 the Tobacco Institute of Southern Africa, a body representing the interests of large cigarette companies, reported that South Africa's illicit cigarette market share was 20%. This share increased to 25% in late 2011 and 30% in 2012. In a 2012 presentation by Tobacco Institute of Southern Africa to National Treasury the illicit market share in 2008 was indicated as 7.9%, compared with claims in that year that the illicit market share was 20%. Industry findings that the illicit market decreased in 2007 and 2008 were not reported in the press. CONCLUSIONS: The tobacco industry has adjusted previous estimates of the illicit trade share downwards to create the impression that illicit trade is high and rising. If previous estimates by the tobacco industry were incorrect the credibility of current estimates should be questioned. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Illegal Tobacco Products; Low/Middle Income Country; Tobacco Industry
Authors: André Szklo; Roberto Magno Iglesias; Mirian Carvalho de Souza; Moysés Szklo; Liz Maria de Almeida Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks; Jeffrey Drope; Stella Aguinaga Bialous; Rachel Rose Jackson Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-03-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hadii M Mamudu; Pooja Subedi; Ali E Alamin; Sreenivas P Veeranki; Daniel Owusu; Amy Poole; Lazarous Mbulo; A E Ogwell Ouma; Adekunle Oke Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.390