Literature DB >> 24920484

Development and performance evaluation of an ultralow flow nanoliquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry set-up.

Thomas Köcher1, Peter Pichler, Mauro De Pra, Laurent Rieux, Remco Swart, Karl Mechtler.   

Abstract

LC-MS/MS is the most commonly used technique for the identification and characterization of proteins. The efficiency of the electrospray process is a critical factor in LC-MS/MS. Despite the benefits associated with very low flow rates for the ionization efficiency, most LC-MS/MS platforms are operated at relatively high flow rates. The purpose of this work was to develop a nano LC system operable at a flow rate of 20 nL/min, applicable for routine analysis in proteomics laboratories. Peptide separation was performed with an analytical column packed with 2 μm porous chromatographic beads, a length of 25 cm and an inner diameter (i.d.) of 25 μm. Practical usability, reproducibility, and overall performance of the system were evaluated with a tryptic peptide mixture generated from HeLa cells. Using 100 ng of sample, we identified on average 3721 protein groups based on 25,699 peptides. We demonstrate that the number of peptides identified with this system increases with decreasing flow rates. Probing the sensitivity of the set-up we analyzed only 10 ng of the sample, identifying an average number of 2042 protein groups based on 11 424 peptides. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000396 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD000396).
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESI; LC-MS/MS; Nanoflow LC; Protein identification; Technology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24920484     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201300418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  5 in total

1.  Exosome cofactor hMTR4 competes with export adaptor ALYREF to ensure balanced nuclear RNA pools for degradation and export.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Bin Kuai; Guifen Wu; Xudong Wu; Binkai Chi; Lantian Wang; Ke Wang; Zhubing Shi; Heng Zhang; She Chen; Zhisong He; Siyuan Wang; Zhaocai Zhou; Guohui Li; Hong Cheng
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Now, More Than Ever, Proteomics Needs Better Chromatography.

Authors:  Evgenia Shishkova; Alexander S Hebert; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 10.304

Review 3.  [Research advances in nano liquid chromatography instrumentation].

Authors:  Sandong Yang; Naijie Li; Zhou Ma; Tao Tang; Tong Li
Journal:  Se Pu       Date:  2021-10

4.  Deep Single-Shot NanoLC-MS Proteome Profiling with a 1500 Bar UHPLC System, Long Fully Porous Columns, and HRAM MS.

Authors:  Runsheng Zheng; Karel Stejskal; Christopher Pynn; Karl Mechtler; Alexander Boychenko
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.370

Review 5.  Evaluation of the Sensitivity of Proteomics Methods Using the Absolute Copy Number of Proteins in a Single Cell as a Metric.

Authors:  Benjamin C Orsburn
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2021-07-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.