Literature DB >> 24920384

Functional analysis of limb transcriptional enhancers in the mouse.

Mark J Nolte1, Ying Wang, Jian Min Deng, Paul G Swinton, Caimiao Wei, Michele Guindani, Robert J Schwartz, Richard R Behringer.   

Abstract

Transcriptional enhancers are genomic sequences bound by transcription factors that act together with basal transcriptional machinery to regulate gene transcription. Several high-throughput methods have generated large datasets of tissue-specific enhancer sequences with putative roles in developmental processes. However, few enhancers have been deleted from the genome to determine their roles in development. To understand the roles of two enhancers active in the mouse embryonic limb bud we deleted them from the genome. Although the genes regulated by these enhancers are unknown, they were selected because they were identified in a screen for putative limb bud-specific enhancers associated with p300, an acetyltransferase that participates in protein complexes that promote active transcription, and because the orthologous human enhancers (H1442 and H280) drive distinct lacZ expression patterns in limb buds of embryonic day (E) 11.5 transgenic mice. We show that the orthologous mouse sequences, M1442 and M280, regulate dynamic expression in the developing limb. Although significant transcriptional differences in enhancer-proximal genes in embryonic limb buds accompany the deletion of M1442 and M280 no gross limb malformations during embryonic development were observed, demonstrating that M1442 and M280 are not required for mouse limb development. However, M280 is required for the development and/or maintenance of body size; M280 mice are significantly smaller than controls. M280 also harbors an "ultraconserved" sequence that is identical between human, rat, and mouse. This is the first report of a phenotype resulting from the deletion of an ultraconserved element. These studies highlight the importance of determining enhancer regulatory function by experiments that manipulate them in situ and suggest that some of an enhancer's regulatory capacities may be developmentally tolerated rather than developmentally required.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24920384      PMCID: PMC4130292          DOI: 10.1111/ede.12084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  64 in total

1.  The origin of digits: expression patterns versus regulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Joost M Woltering; Denis Duboule
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Vertebrate limb bud development: moving towards integrative analysis of organogenesis.

Authors:  Rolf Zeller; Javier López-Ríos; Aimée Zuniga
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Esx1 is an X-chromosome-imprinted regulator of placental development and fetal growth.

Authors:  Y Li; R R Behringer
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Engineering chromosomes in mice through targeted meiotic recombination (TAMERE).

Authors:  Y Hérault; M Rassoulzadegan; F Cuzin; D Duboule
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Promoting developmental transcription.

Authors:  Uwe Ohler; David A Wassarman
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Embryonic staging system for the short-tailed fruit bat, Carollia perspicillata, a model organism for the mammalian order Chiroptera, based upon timed pregnancies in captive-bred animals.

Authors:  Chris J Cretekos; Scott D Weatherbee; Chih-Hsin Chen; Nilima K Badwaik; Lee Niswander; Richard R Behringer; John J Rasweiler
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Elimination of a long-range cis-regulatory module causes complete loss of limb-specific Shh expression and truncation of the mouse limb.

Authors:  Tomoko Sagai; Masaki Hosoya; Youichi Mizushina; Masaru Tamura; Toshihiko Shiroishi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers.

Authors:  Axel Visel; Matthew J Blow; Zirong Li; Tao Zhang; Jennifer A Akiyama; Amy Holt; Ingrid Plajzer-Frick; Malak Shoukry; Crystal Wright; Feng Chen; Veena Afzal; Bing Ren; Edward M Rubin; Len A Pennacchio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Primary cilia can both mediate and suppress Hedgehog pathway-dependent tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Sunny Y Wong; Allen D Seol; Po-Lin So; Alexandre N Ermilov; Christopher K Bichakjian; Ervin H Epstein; Andrzej A Dlugosz; Jeremy F Reiter
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 10.  Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers.

Authors:  Axel Visel; Edward M Rubin; Len A Pennacchio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Enhancer redundancy in development and disease.

Authors:  Evgeny Z Kvon; Zeba Wunderlich; Rachel Waymack; Mario Gad
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Enhancer Domains Predict Gene Pathogenicity and Inform Gene Discovery in Complex Disease.

Authors:  Xinchen Wang; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic Variations of Ultraconserved Elements in the Human Genome.

Authors:  Anamarija Habic; John S Mattick; George Adrian Calin; Rok Krese; Janez Konc; Tanja Kunej
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2019-11

Review 4.  Perfect and imperfect views of ultraconserved sequences.

Authors:  Valentina Snetkova; Len A Pennacchio; Axel Visel; Diane E Dickel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 59.581

5.  Sox2-Evf2 lncRNA-mediated mechanisms of chromosome topological control in developing forebrain.

Authors:  Ivelisse Cajigas; Abhijit Chakraborty; Madison Lynam; Kelsey R Swyter; Monique Bastidas; Linden Collens; Hao Luo; Ferhat Ay; Jhumku D Kohtz
Journal:  Development       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 6.  Conserved non-coding elements: developmental gene regulation meets genome organization.

Authors:  Dimitris Polychronopoulos; James W D King; Alexander J Nash; Ge Tan; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The hypothesis of ultraconserved enhancer dispensability overturned.

Authors:  Laura Elnitski; Ivan Ovcharenko
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Heart enhancers with deeply conserved regulatory activity are established early in zebrafish development.

Authors:  Xuefei Yuan; Mengyi Song; Patrick Devine; Benoit G Bruneau; Ian C Scott; Michael D Wilson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Evolution, structure and emerging roles of C1ORF112 in DNA replication, DNA damage responses, and cancer.

Authors:  Jacob Edogbanya; Daniela Tejada-Martinez; Nigel J Jones; Amit Jaiswal; Sarah Bell; Rui Cordeiro; Sipko van Dam; Daniel J Rigden; João Pedro de Magalhães
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Loss-of-function tolerance of enhancers in the human genome.

Authors:  Duo Xu; Omer Gokcumen; Ekta Khurana
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.