| Literature DB >> 24920347 |
Da Zhang, Jin She, Zhengbo Zhang, Mengsun Yu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Investigating the responses of autonomic nervous system (ANS) in hypoxia may provide some knowledge about the mechanism of neural control and rhythmic adjustment. The integrated cardiac and respiratory system display complicated dynamics that are affected by intrinsic feedback mechanisms controlling their interaction. To probe how the cardiac and respiratory system adjust their rhythms in different simulated altitudes, we studied heart rate variability (HRV) in frequency domain, the complexity of heartbeat series and cardiorespiratory phase synchronization (CRPS) between heartbeat intervals and respiratory cycles.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24920347 PMCID: PMC4059097 DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-73
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Figure 1Experimental protocol described with a diagram showing altitude vs. time. Each subject stayed at each simulated altitude for 15 minutes. The physiological data of the last 10 minutes was considered as steady state and adopted for analysis. The simulated altitude ascended from sea level (SL) to 3000 m and 3000 m to 4000 m at the rate of 3 m/s.
Figure 2ECG (a), respiratory signal (b) and the instantaneous phase of the respiratory signal (c) for subject 5 at sea level.
Figure 3The cardiorespiratory synchrogram for subject 5 at sea level was plotted at the top. The solid dots located at 48 s to 88 s and 230 s to 251 s respectively composed 7 parallel lines in synchrogram and demonstrated CRPS with the ratio of 7:2 (n = 7 heartbeats within m = 2 consecutive respiratory cycles) during the 300 s periods. f/f which was the instantaneous ratio of heart rate (f) to respiratory rate (f) was plotted at the bottom.
SpO2, HR and RespR recorded at SL, 3000 m and 4000 m
| SpO2 (%) | 97 ± 1 | 90 ± 3 | 84 ± 4 § |
| HR (1/min) | 72 ± 5 | 77 ± 5 | 84 ± 5 ‡ |
| RespR (1/min) | 22 ± 2 | 23 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 † |
§ Significantly lower compared with the value at SL and 3000 m (both P < 0.001).
‡ Significantly increase compared with the value at SL (P < 0.001) and 3000 m (P = 0.002).
† Significantly change compared to the value at SL (P = 0.012), but there was no significant change between SL and 3000 m (P = 0.169), neither between 3000 m and 4000 m (P = 0.217).
HRV indices recorded at different altitudes
| LF(ms2) | 623 ± 290 | 427 ± 192 | 253 ± 137 ¶ |
| HF(ms2) | 754 ± 649 | 473 ± 517 | 177 ± 266 § |
| LF/HF | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 1.9 ± 1.7 | 2.7 ± 1.3 ‡ |
| SampEn | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.8 ± 0.1 † | 1.9 ± 0.1 † |
¶ Significantly decreased compared with the value at SL (P < 0.001) and 3000 m (P = 0.008).
§ Significantly reduced compared to the value at SL (P < 0.001) and 3000 m (P = 0.007).
‡ Significantly increased from SL to 4000 m (P = 0.006), but there was no significant difference between SL and 3000 m (P = 0.062), neither between 3000 m and 4000 m (P = 0.321).
† Significantly increased compared with the value at SL (P = 0.004 at 3000 m and P < 0.001 at 4000 m). However, there was no significant difference between 3000 m and 4000 m (P = 0.127).
Figure 4Synchronization time (s) changed with the simulated altitude. The value was 60 ± 26 s, 80 ± 41 s and 113 ± 48 s at sea level (SL), 3000 m and 4000 m, respectively. The T at 4000 m was significantly longer than the value at SL (asterisk indicates P = 0.003) and 3000 m (plus indicates P = 0.040), but there was non-significantly change between at 3000 m and at SL (P = 0.214). The error bars indicated the standard deviation.