Literature DB >> 24918913

LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with the risk of coronary heart disease in Chinese population.

Li Wei1, Shuchuan Liu2, Zhendong Su1, Rongchao Cheng1, Xiuping Bai1, Xueqi Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Global methylation level in blood leukocyte DNA has been associated with the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), with inconsistent results in various populations. Similar data are lacking in Chinese population where different genetic, lifestyle and environmental factors may affect DNA methylation and its risk relationship with CHD.
OBJECTIVES: To examine whether global methylation is associated with the risk of CHD in Chinese population.
METHODS: A total of 334 cases with CHD and 788 healthy controls were included. Global methylation in blood leukocyte DNA was estimated by analyzing LINE-1 repeats using bisulfite pyrosequencing.
RESULTS: In an initial analysis restricted to control subjects, LINE-1 level reduced significantly with aging, elevated total cholesterol, and diagnosis of diabetes. In the case-control analysis, reduced LINE-1 methylation was associated with increased risk of CHD; analysis by quartile revealed odds ratios (95%CI) of 0.9 (0.6-1.4), 1.9 (1.3-2.9) and 2.3 (1.6-3.5) for the third, second and first (lowest) quartile (Ptrend < 0.001), respectively, compared to the fourth (highest) quartile. Lower (<median) LINE-1 methylation was associated with a 2.2-fold (95%CI = 1.7-3.0) increased risk of CHD. The lower LINE-1-related CHD risk estimates tended to be stronger among subjects with the highest tertile of homocysteine (Pinteraction = 0.042) and those with diagnosis of hypertension (Pinteraction = 0.012).
CONCLUSION: LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with the risk of CHD in Chinese population. Potential CHD risk factors such as older age, elevated total cholesterol, and diagnosis of diabetes may have impact on global DNA methylation, whereby exerting their effect on CHD risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24918913      PMCID: PMC4051451          DOI: 10.5935/abc.20140054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol        ISSN: 0066-782X            Impact factor:   2.000


Introduction

Coronary heart disease (CHD) constitutes 90-95% of all cases with cardiovascular diseases, which rank the leading cause of death in the world[1,2]. Age, sex, diets, cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, homocysteine, obesity, family history of CHD and genetic factors have been characterized to play a major role in the CHD etiology[2-4]. Epigenetic modification, especially aberrant global DNA methylation pattern, is increasingly recognized as a key factor in the development of CHD. Global DNA hypomethylation may induce genomic instability and deregulate gene transcription, thereby contributing to the development of various human diseases including CHD[5]. In animal models, global DNA hypomethylation has been associated with aortic lipid deposition, a predictor of future atherosclerosis[6,7]. Further, an association between global DNA hypomethylation and susceptibility to subclinical atherosclerosis has been reported in young adults[8]. In addition, in healthy subjects, global methylation level measured in blood leukocyte DNA has been associated with risk factors for CHD, such as aging, cigarette smoking, folate deficiency, hyperhomocysteinemia, higher levels of low density lipoprotein and lower levels of high density lipoprotein[9-14]. Several epidemiological studies have reported that global methylation level could be a determinant risk factor for CHD, but the results were inconsistent in various populations[15-17]. Similar data are lacking in Chinese population where different genetic, lifestyle and environmental factors may affect DNA methylation and its risk relationship with CHD[18,19]. About 55% of human genome consists of repetitive elements[20], including approximately 500,000 LINE-1 repeats which represent approximately 17% of the human genome[21]. Because of high representation throughout the genome and heavy methylation in normal tissue, LINE-1 has been used as a surrogate marker for estimating global DNA methylation levels[22,23]. In the present study, we have investigated the relationship between LINE-1 methylation and the risk of CHD in a Chinese population. We also examined the association between LINE-1 methylation and potential risk factors for CHD including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), total cholesterol, triglyceride, homocysteine, smoking status, hypertension and diabetes, as well as their modifying effect on the LINE-1-related risk estimate for CHD.

Methods

Study participants

This case-control study enrolled 334 patients with CHD and 788 control subjects from the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China from March 2007 to September 2010. All participants were unrelated individuals from the Chinese Han population, and the controls were frequency-matched to the cases by age (± 5 years) and sex. The diagnosis of CHD was established by angiographic evidence of ≥70% stenosis of 1 major coronary artery, or ≥ 50% of the left main coronary artery. The controls filled a regular health survey and their detailed examination by history analysis, physical examination, electrocardiography, and echocardiography revealed absence of CHD or other heart diseases. For both CHD and control groups, subjects with spastic angina pectoris, peripheral artery disease, and any kind of autoimmune-related disease or cancers were excluded. Information on age, sex, height, weight, cigarette smoking, and diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes was obtained by using a structured questionnaire through in-person interviews. An ever-smoker was defined as a smoker of at least 1 cigarette per day for at least 6 months. BMI was calculated using the formula: body weight in kilograms divided by the square of body height in meters (kg/m2). Information on serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and plasma homocysteine was collected on the basis of medical records. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review committee of the Institutional Review Board of the participant hospital.

DNA methylation analysis of LINE-1 repetitive elements

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood leukocytes using the QIAamp DNA Blood Extraction kit (Qiagen, Shanghai, China), and then modified by treatment with sodium bisulfite using the Zymo EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo, CA, USA), following the manufacturer's protocol. A modified method of PCR-based pyrosequencing originally described by Yang et al[22] was performed to quantitate methylation of the LINE-1 repetitive elements. In brief, PCR was carried out in a 50-μl reaction volume containing 25 μl of GoTaq Green Master mix (Promega, WI, USA), 1 pmol of forward primer (TTT TGA GTT AGG TGT GGG ATA TA), 1 pmol of biotinylated reverse primer (biotin-AAA ATC AAA AAA TTC CCT TTC), and 50 ng of bisulfite-treated genomic DNA. PCR cycling conditions were 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s for 40 cycles. PCR product was bound to streptavidin sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden). These sepharose beads containing the bound PCR product were purified, washed, denatured and washed again. Then, 0.3-μM pyrosequencing primer (AGT TAG GTG TGG GAT ATA GT) was annealed to the purified single-stranded PCR product. Pyrosequencing was performed using the PSQ HS 96 Pyrosequencing System. For all assays we used built-in controls to verify bisulfite conversion. Each sample was assayed in duplicate and their average was used in final analysis. The degree of LINE-1 methylation was expressed as % 5-methylated cytosines (%5mC) over total (methylated + unmethylated) cytosines.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square test was used to examine the differences in the distributions of categorical variables and Student's t-test for the differences in means of continuous variables between CHD cases and control subjects. Linear regression models were used to evaluate LINE-1 differences among controls in relation to age, sex, BMI, total cholesterol, triglyceride, homocysteine, smoking status, hypertension and diabetes. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) for CHD and 95% confidence interval (CI). Quartile and median cut-points were based on LINE-1 distributions among controls. All models were adjusted for age (as a continuous variable), sex, and smoking status (ever-smoker: yes vs no). Further adjustment by other potential confounding variables, including BMI, total cholesterol, triglyceride, homocysteine, hypertension and diabetes, did not materially alter the risk estimates. Therefore, these variables were not included in the final models. Effect modification by individual covariates was assessed using likelihood-ratio tests. All tests were two-sided and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Stata 10.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

Results

The potential risk factors of study subjects by case and control status are shown in Table 1. No significant differences between CHD cases and control subjects were found in the distributions of age, sex, BMI, or triglyceride. When compared with the controls, CHD cases were more likely to be ever-smoker, and tended to have higher levels of total cholesterol and homocysteine. Cases also were likely to have diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes.
Table 1

Potential risk factors of study subjects

Potential risk factorsCases, n (%)Controls, n (%)p value*
Age (tertile), years   
< 5996 (28.7)266 (33.8) 
60-65119 (35.6)236 (29.9) 
> 65119 (35.6)286 (36.3)0.12
Sex   
Female66 (19.8)150 (19.0) 
Male268 (80.2)638 (81.0)0.78
Ever-smoker   
No156 (47.4)590 (75.4) 
Yes173 (52.6)193 (24.6)< 0.001
Body mass index (tertile), kg/m2   
< 22.097 (29.1)262 (33.2) 
22.0-25.4122 (36.5)264 (33.6) 
> 25.4115 (34.4)262 (33.2)0.36
Total cholesterol (tertile), mmol/L   
< 2.957 (17.1)262 (33.2) 
2.9-4.8123 (36.8)263 (33.4) 
> 4.8154 (46.1)263 (33.4)< 0.001
Triglyceride (tertile), mmol/L   
< 1.1113 (33.8)265 (33.7) 
1.1-1.6111 (33.2)258 (32.8) 
> 1.6110 (33.0)263 (33.5)0.98
Homocysteine (tertile), μmol/L   
< 970 (21.6)241 (32.3) 
9-11106 (32.7)252 (33.7) 
> 11148 (45.7)254 (34.0)< 0.001
Hypertension   
No128 (38.3)520 (66.0) 
Yes206 (61.7)268 (34.0)< 0.001
Diabetes   
No212 (63.5)638 (81.0) 
Yes122 (36.5)150 (19.0)< 0.001
Mean LINE-1 (SD)80.96 (2.40)81.67 (2.46)< 0.001

SD: standard deviation.

P value obtained from a X2-test comparing cases and controls.

P value obtained from a Student's t-test comparing cases and controls.

Potential risk factors of study subjects SD: standard deviation. P value obtained from a X2-test comparing cases and controls. P value obtained from a Student's t-test comparing cases and controls. The effects of potential risk factors on LINE-1 methylation level among control subjects are shown in Table 2. As expected, LINE-1 level reduced significantly with increasing age (p = 0.016). We also observed that total cholesterol (p < 0.001) and diagnosis of diabetes (p < 0.001) were inversely associated with LINE-1 methylation levels. No statistically significant relationships were observed between LINE-1 methylation level and sex, smoking status, BMI, triglyceride, homocysteine, or diagnosis of hypertension.
Table 2

Relation of potential CHD risk factors to LINE-1 methylation levels among control subjects

Potential risk factorsnLINE-1, mean (95% CI)*P value*
Age (tertile), years   
< 5926681.58 (81.33-81.83) 
60-6523681.47 (81.22-81.72) 
> 6528681.21 (80.97-81.45)0.016
Sex
Female15081.47 (81.14-81.81) 
Male63881.40 (81.24-81.56)0.46
Ever smoker§   
No59081.59 (81.41-81.76) 
Yes19381.05 (80.80-81.31)0.35
Body mass index (tertile), kg/m2   
< 22.026281.41 (81.16-81.66) 
22.0-25.426481.24 (80.99-81.48) 
> 25.426281.58 (81.34-81.83)0.54
Total cholesterol (tertile), mmol/L   
< 2.926281.83 (81.57-82.10) 
2.9-4.826381.57 (81.34-81.81) 
> 4.826380.95 (80.72-81.18)< 0.001
Triglyceride (tertile), mmol/L   
< 1.126581.39 (81.15-81.64) 
1.1-1.625881.43 (81.18-81.68) 
> 1.626381.42 (81.18-81.67)0.42
Homocysteine (tertile), μmol/L   
< 924181.53 (81.26-81.80) 
9-1125281.37 (81.12-81.63) 
> 1125481.41 (81.17-81.65)0.91
Hypertension   
No52081.53 (81.34-81.72) 
Yes26881.25 (81.03-81.47)0.59
Diabetes   
No63881.59 (81.43-81.75) 
Yes15080.85 (80.56-81.14)< 0.001

CHD: Coronary heart disease; CI: Confidence interval.

Adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status.

Only adjusted for sex and smoking status.

Only adjusted for age and smoking status.

Only adjusted for age and sex.

Relation of potential CHD risk factors to LINE-1 methylation levels among control subjects CHD: Coronary heart disease; CI: Confidence interval. Adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status. Only adjusted for sex and smoking status. Only adjusted for age and smoking status. Only adjusted for age and sex. CHD cases had significantly reduced LINE-1 methylation level than controls (mean (standard deviation, SD): 80.96 (2.40) vs 81.67 (2.46), p < 0.001) (Table 1). Analyses of LINE-1 in quartiles, based on the distribution in controls, show that the LINE-1 methylation level was inversely associated with the risk of CHD (Table 3). Relative to subjects in the fourth (highest) quartile of LINE-1 methylation, ORs for CHD were 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.4), 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3-2.9) and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.6-3.5) for the subjects with methylation in the third, second and first (lowest) quartile (Ptrend < 0.001), respectively. When using the alternative cut-point based on the median, individuals with lower ( median) LINE-1 methylation.
Table 3

LINE-1 methylation levels in relation to CHD risk

LINE-1 (%5mC)Cases, n (%)Controls, n (%)OR (95% CI)*
Quartile   
Q4(> 82.73)55 (16.5)197 (25.0)1.0 (reference)
Q3(81.52-82.72)49 (14.7)194 (24.6)0.9 (0.6-1.4)
Q2(80.17-81.51)101 (30.2)199 (25.3)1.9(1.3-2.9)
Q1(< 80.16)129 (38.6)198 (25.1)2.3 (1.6-3.5)
   Ptrend < 0.001
Median   
High(≥ 81.52)104 (31.1)391 (49.6)1.0 (reference)
Low(< 81.52)230 (68.9)397 (50.4)2.2 (1.7-3.0)

%5mC: % 5-methylated cytosines; CHD: coronary heart disease; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

Adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status.

The quartiles and the median of LINE-1 measures were based on values among control subjects.

LINE-1 methylation levels in relation to CHD risk %5mC: % 5-methylated cytosines; CHD: coronary heart disease; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio. Adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status. The quartiles and the median of LINE-1 measures were based on values among control subjects. When stratified by potential risk factors, the lower LINE-1-related CHD risk estimates tended to be stronger among subjects with the highest tertile of homocysteine (OR = 3.2, 95% CI, 3.2-5.2) and those with diagnosis of hypertension (OR = 3.1, 95 %CI, 2.1-4.8) (Table 4). Statistically significant interactions in relation to CHD risk were observed between LINE-1 methylation and homocysteine level (Pinteraction = 0.042), and between LINE-1 methylation and hypertension (Pinteraction = 0.012). Stratification by other potential risk factors including age (tertile), sex (female, male), smoking status (ever-smoker: no, yes), BMI (tertile), total cholesterol (tertile), triglyceride (tertile), and diagnosis of diabetes (no, yes), produced comparable risk estimates (data not shown). The interactions between LINE-1 methylation and these factors on CHD risk were not statistically significant (data not shown).
Table 4

LINE-1 level in relation to CHD risk, by homocysteine level and diagnosis of hypertension

Potential risk factorsLINE-1*Cases, n (%)Controls, n (%)OR (95% CI)
Homocysteine, umol/L
< 9High24 (34.3)126 (52.3)1.0 (reference)
Low46 (65.7)115 (47.7)2.2 (1.2-4.0)
9-11High41 (38.7)115 (45.6)1.0 (reference)
Low65 (61.3)137 (54.4)1.4 (0.9-2.3)
> 11High36 (24.3)135 (53.1)1.0 (reference)
Low112 (75.7)119 (46.9)3.2 (2.0-5.2)
Hypertension
NoHigh51 (39.8)251 (48.3)1.0 (reference)
Low77 (60.2)269 (51.7)1.5 (1.0-2.3)
YesHigh53 (25.7)140 (52.2)1.0 (reference)
Low153 (74.3)128 (47.8)3.1 (2.1-4.8)

CHD: coronary heart disease; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

The median of LINE-1 measure was based on values among control subjects. High: ≥ 81.52 (%5mC); Low: < 81.52 (%5mC).

Adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status.

LINE-1 level in relation to CHD risk, by homocysteine level and diagnosis of hypertension CHD: coronary heart disease; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio. The median of LINE-1 measure was based on values among control subjects. High: ≥ 81.52 (%5mC); Low: < 81.52 (%5mC). Adjusted for age, sex, and smoking status.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated a statistically significant, inverse relationship between LINE-1 methylation level and CHD risk in the Chinese population. Homocysteine level and diagnosis of hypertension modified this inverse relationship. Considering that CHD is one of the most common diseases, along with its severity[24], the risk factor of global hypomethylation could have a sizable impact on public health. Because DNA methylation is a reversible epigenetic mechanism, this blood-based marker could offer exciting new opportunities for population-based CHD prevention as well as risk assessment[25]. Global DNA methylation levels, assessed in repeat regions from leukocyte-derived DNA, have been reported to be associated with risk of CHD in American, Singapore, and Indian populations, with inconsistent observations[15-17]. In a cohort of 712 elderly men from American population, LINE-1 hypomethylation was associated with increased risk for ischemic heart disease in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses[15]. This is consistent with the findings in the present study. However, in our data, there were also significant relationships among women as well as in different age groups between LINE-1 methylation and CHD risk, which provide further data to what was previously observed in the American population[15]. On the other hand, in a Singapore population, higher methylation levels of Alu/Sat2 repeats were reported in males with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke (n = 8) than in control males (n = 121)[16]; In an Indian population, higher methylation levels of CCGG sequences were reported in cases with coronary artery disease (n = 137) than in controls (n = 150)[17]. The different lifestyle, environmental exposures, and genetic backgrounds among the populations, and differences in sample size and repetitive elements of DNA targeted for measuring global hypomethylation levels[26-28], might contributed to the different findings across these studies. The modifying effect of age on global DNA methylation levels, consistent with previous data[29], may reflect age-related cumulative effects of enviromental exposures to risk factors for CHD. Global hypomethylation in leukocyte DNA has been associated with exposure to multiple types of enviromental pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, particulate air pollution, black carbon and sulfates[30-32]. The present study also showed that two recognized CHD risk factors, elevated total cholesterol and diagnosis of diabetes, were related to reduced LINE-1 methylation levels, further supporting a role of DNA hypomethylation in the development of CHD. In our data, there was a lack of association between LINE-1 methylation and homocysteine level or diagnosis of hypertension, which differs somewhat from what was observed previously[10,33]. However, we observed that both homocysteine level and diagnosis of hypertension modified the inverse relationship between LINE-1 methylation and CHD risk. Further studies are warranted to replicate these findings and to elucidate the underlying mechanism of homocysteine level and diagnosis of hypertension on their modifying role in the association between global hypomethylation and CHD risk. Our study had the advantages of being based on a relatively large sample size, diagnosis of CHD by angiographic evidence, and accurate quantitative analysis using pyrosequencing methodology, which is suitable for measuring subtle changes in DNA methylation. The chief limitation of the present study was the retrospective nature of the study design, i.e., the collection of blood samples from CHD patients took place after their CHD diagnosis. If the diagnosis of CHD had any direct or indirect impact on global DNA methylation through changing subject's lifestyle or environmental exposure, we could have observed a confounded or biased association between LINE-1 methylation and CHD risk. However, similar risk estimates were observed when the logistic regression analysis was restricted to 212 newly diagnosed CHD cases as compared to controls (data not shown). Moreover, our finding that LINE-1 methylation levels were reduced in control subjects with CHD risk factors such as older age, elevated total cholesterol, and diagnosis of diabetes, indicates that reduced LINE-1 methylation in high-risk control subjects may result from exposures related to the risk of CHD. In addition, in the longitudinal analyses in the study by Baccarelli et al[31], lower LINE-1-related increased risk of ischemic heart disease has been observed.

Conclusion

The findings of the present study support global DNA hypomethylation measured in LINE-1 repeats is associated with the risk of CHD in the Chinese population. Potential CHD risk factors such as older age, elevated total cholesterol and diagnosis of diabetes may have impact on global DNA methylation, whereby exerting their effect on CHD risk.
  32 in total

1.  Predictors of global methylation levels in blood DNA of healthy subjects: a combined analysis.

Authors:  Zhong-Zheng Zhu; Lifang Hou; Valentina Bollati; Letizia Tarantini; Barbara Marinelli; Laura Cantone; Allen S Yang; Pantel Vokonas; Jolanta Lissowska; Silvia Fustinoni; Angela C Pesatori; Matteo Bonzini; Pietro Apostoli; Giovanni Costa; Pier Alberto Bertazzi; Wong-Ho Chow; Joel Schwartz; Andrea Baccarelli
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Hyperhomocysteinemia, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase c.677C>T polymorphism and risk of cancer: cross-sectional and prospective studies and meta-analyses of 75,000 cases and 93,000 controls.

Authors:  Jeppe Zacho; Shiva Yazdanyar; Stig E Bojesen; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Børge G Nordestgaard
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Mice deficient in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase exhibit hyperhomocysteinemia and decreased methylation capacity, with neuropathology and aortic lipid deposition.

Authors:  Z Chen; A C Karaplis; S L Ackerman; I P Pogribny; S Melnyk; S Lussier-Cacan; M F Chen; A Pai; S W John; R S Smith; T Bottiglieri; P Bagley; J Selhub; M A Rudnicki; S J James; R Rozen
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Prenatal smoke exposure and genomic DNA methylation in a multiethnic birth cohort.

Authors:  Julie D Flom; Jennifer S Ferris; Yuyan Liao; Parisa Tehranifar; Clara Belessiotis Richards; Yoon Hee Cho; Karina Gonzalez; Regina M Santella; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  DNA methylation as a biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Myungjin Kim; Tiffany I Long; Kazuko Arakawa; Renwei Wang; Mimi C Yu; Peter W Laird
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genomic DNA methylation among women in a multiethnic New York City birth cohort.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Jennifer S Ferris; Richard Pilsner; Julie D Flom; Parisa Tehranifar; Regina M Santella; Mary V Gamble; Ezra Susser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  DNA methylation polymorphisms precede any histological sign of atherosclerosis in mice lacking apolipoprotein E.

Authors:  Gertrud Lund; Linda Andersson; Massimiliano Lauria; Marie Lindholm; Mario F Fraga; Ana Villar-Garea; Esteban Ballestar; Manel Esteller; Silvio Zaina
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Delivery type not associated with global methylation at birth.

Authors:  Shama Virani; Dana C Dolinoy; Sindhu Halubai; Tamara R Jones; Steve E Domino; Laura S Rozek; Muna S Nahar; Vasantha Padmanabhan
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 6.551

10.  Prolonged exposure to particulate pollution, genes associated with glutathione pathways, and DNA methylation in a cohort of older men.

Authors:  Jaime Madrigano; Andrea Baccarelli; Murray A Mittleman; Robert O Wright; David Sparrow; Pantel S Vokonas; Letizia Tarantini; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  13 in total

1.  Serine hydroxymethyltransferase 1 promoter hypermethylation increases the risk of essential hypertension.

Authors:  Guodong Xu; Changyi Wang; Xiuru Ying; Fanqian Kong; Huihui Ji; Jinshun Zhao; Xiaohong Zhang; Shiwei Duan; Liyuan Han; Li Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 2.  Melatonin: Regulation of Viral Phase Separation and Epitranscriptomics in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19.

Authors:  Doris Loh; Russel J Reiter
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Possible Mediation by Methylation in Acute Inflammation Following Personal Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution.

Authors:  Cuicui Wang; Renjie Chen; Min Shi; Jing Cai; Jingjin Shi; Changyuan Yang; Huichu Li; Zhijing Lin; Xia Meng; Cong Liu; Yue Niu; Yongjie Xia; Zhuohui Zhao; Haidong Kan; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  DNA methylation profile of genes involved in inflammation and autoimmunity correlates with vascular function in morbidly obese adults.

Authors:  Mohamed M Ali; Dina Naquiallah; Maryam Qureshi; Mohammed Imaduddin Mirza; Chandra Hassan; Mario Masrur; Francesco M Bianco; Patrice Frederick; Giulianotti P Cristoforo; Antonio Gangemi; Shane A Phillips; Abeer M Mahmoud
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  The Role of DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ke-Xin Wen; Jelena Miliç; Bassem El-Khodor; Klodian Dhana; Jana Nano; Tammy Pulido; Bledar Kraja; Asija Zaciragic; Wichor M Bramer; John Troup; Rajiv Chowdhury; M Arfam Ikram; Abbas Dehghan; Taulant Muka; Oscar H Franco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Chronic exposure to arsenic, LINE-1 hypomethylation, and blood pressure: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Khaled Hossain; Takehiro Suzuki; M M Hasibuzzaman; Md Shofikul Islam; Atiqur Rahman; Sudip Kumar Paul; Tanzina Tanu; Shakhawoat Hossain; Zahangir Alam Saud; Mashiur Rahman; Farjana Nikkon; Hideki Miyataka; Seiichiro Himeno; Keiko Nohara
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 7.  The Management of Cardiovascular Risk through Epigenetic Biomarkers.

Authors:  Laurent Metzinger; Stefano de Franciscis; Raffaele Serra
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effects of Physical Exercise on Endothelial Function and DNA Methylation.

Authors:  Luca Ferrari; Marco Vicenzi; Letizia Tarantini; Francesco Barretta; Silvia Sironi; Andrea A Baccarelli; Marco Guazzi; Valentina Bollati
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  DNA hydroxymethylation combined with carotid plaques as a novel biomarker for coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Dan Jiang; Ying Wang; Guanglei Chang; Qin Duan; Linna You; Min Sun; Chunxiao Hu; Lei Gao; Shiyong Wu; Hongmei Tao; Kai Lu; Dongying Zhang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  The Role of DNA Methylation in Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Minyan Zeng; Juanying Zhen; Xiaodan Zheng; Hongyan Qiu; Xiaonan Xu; Jun Wu; Zhijian Lin; Jun Hu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.