The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is a potential pathway for therapeutic intervention for pathogens such as Plasmodium, the causative agent of malaria. However, due to the essential nature of this proteolytic pathway, proteasome inhibitors must avoid inhibition of the host enzyme complex to prevent toxic side effects. The Plasmodium proteasome is poorly characterized, making rational design of inhibitors that induce selective parasite killing difficult. In this study, we developed a chemical probe that labels all catalytic sites of the Plasmodium proteasome. Using this probe, we identified several subunit selective small molecule inhibitors of the parasite enzyme complex. Treatment with an inhibitor that is specific for the β5 subunit during blood stage schizogony led to a dramatic decrease in parasite replication while short-term inhibition of the β2 subunit did not affect viability. Interestingly, coinhibition of both the β2 and β5 catalytic subunits resulted in enhanced parasite killing at all stages of the blood stage life cycle and reduced parasite levels in vivo to barely detectable levels. Parasite killing was achieved with overall low host toxicity, something that has not been possible with existing proteasome inhibitors. Our results highlight differences in the subunit dependency of the parasite and human proteasome, thus providing a strategy for development of potent antimalarial drugs with overall low host toxicity.
The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is a potential pathway for therapeutic intervention for pathogens such as Plasmodium, the causative agent of malaria. However, due to the essential nature of this proteolytic pathway, proteasome inhibitors must avoid inhibition of the host enzyme complex to prevent toxic side effects. The Plasmodium proteasome is poorly characterized, making rational design of inhibitors that induce selective parasite killing difficult. In this study, we developed a chemical probe that labels all catalytic sites of the Plasmodium proteasome. Using this probe, we identified several subunit selective small molecule inhibitors of the parasite enzyme complex. Treatment with an inhibitor that is specific for the β5 subunit during blood stage schizogony led to a dramatic decrease in parasite replication while short-term inhibition of the β2 subunit did not affect viability. Interestingly, coinhibition of both the β2 and β5 catalytic subunits resulted in enhanced parasite killing at all stages of the blood stage life cycle and reduced parasite levels in vivo to barely detectable levels. Parasite killing was achieved with overall low host toxicity, something that has not been possible with existing proteasome inhibitors. Our results highlight differences in the subunit dependency of the parasite and human proteasome, thus providing a strategy for development of potent antimalarial drugs with overall low host toxicity.
Malaria
is a disease caused
by the Apicomplexan parasite Plasmodium. Of the five Plasmodium species that infect human, Plasmodium
falciparum is responsible for the most severe form of malaria. P. falciparum has an estimated disease burden of 219 million
people in 2010 and is mostly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa.[1] The disease is especially lethal to young children,
with the majority of death by malaria occurring in children less than
five years old.[2]P. falciparum can rapidly evolve resistance to drugs, and this emergence of drug
resistance to many current drug targets highlights the need to develop
new antimalarial therapeutics.[3] The Plasmodium proteasome has been proposed as a potential drug
target for the treatment of malaria. Proteasome inhibitors attenuate
parasite growth during the asexual intraerythrocytic stages, the sexual
stage as well as the liver stage of Plasmodium.[4] This makes the Plasmodium proteasome
an ideal target for drug development, as inhibitors could not only
reduce or eliminate the acute stage of the disease but also potentially
block transmission.The proteasome is a multisubunit enzyme
complex that is conserved
across the eukaryota.[5] It is made up of
a 20S catalytic core that is capped by regulatory subunits that control
the entry of substrates. The 20S core has a barrel-shaped structure
made up of two heptameric rings of β subunits sandwiched between
two heptameric rings of α subunits.[6] Only the β1, β2, and β5 subunits have catalytic
activity. The β1 subunit has caspase-like activity, favoring
cleavage after acidic residues, while the β2 subunit has trypsin-like
activity (cleaves after basic residues), and the β5 subunit
has chymotrypsin-like activity (cleaves after nonpolar residues).[7] Studies using yeast mutants of each catalytic
subunit showed preliminary evidence that the β5 subunit is the
most essential catalytic subunit as its inactivation caused significant
growth defects.[8,9] The β2 catalytic mutant,
on the other hand, only showed slightly reduced growth, and the β1
and β2 double mutants show a stronger growth defect, though
not as severe as the β5 mutant.[10] From these studies, it was concluded that selective inhibition of
the catalytic site in the β5 subunit alone is able to reduce
cell viability. However, recent studies using subunit selective inhibitors
on a panel of mammaliancancer cells found that most cells are not
sensitive to inhibition of the β5 subunit alone but instead
require coinhibition of β5 with β2 and/or β1 to
induce efficient cell killing.[11−13] Normal human cells are resistant
to selective inhibition of the chymotrypsin-like site,[14] and only a few cancer cell lines are sensitive
to inhibition of β5 alone.[15]The Plasmodium proteasome remains poorly studied
by biochemical methods, and it is unclear if the Plasmodium parasite has similar sensitivity to subunit selective inhibition
as its mammalian host cells. Our previous efforts identified an epoxyketone
proteasome inhibitor that can effectively attenuate parasite growth
both in culture and in vivo.[16] As this inhibitor targets multiple subunits of the P. falciparum proteasome, it was not useful for assessment of the effects of specific
proteasome subunit inhibition. In this study, we designed and synthesized
an activity-based probe for the P. falciparum proteasome
that covalently labels all three catalytic sites of the Plasmodium proteasome. This allowed us to identify compounds that could be
used to chemically knockdown activity of individual catalytic subunits
and correlate loss of activity with P. falciparum growth. Using this approach we find that, unlike in human cells, P. falciparum is sensitive to short-term inhibition of the
β5 subunit, and this sensitivity is most pronounced during parasite
schizogony. Furthermore, coinhibition of the Plasmodium β5 and β2 proteasome subunits results in effective parasite
killing at all stages of the asexual form of P. falciparum with minimal host cell toxicity. These results provide us guidelines
to design parasite-killing proteasome inhibitors as a new class of
antimalarial drugs.
Results and Discussion
Design and Synthesis of Plasmodium Proteasome
Activity-Based Probe
Analysis of the sequence homology of
the P. falciparum proteasome suggest that it contains
caspase-like, trypsin-like, and chymotrypsin-like active sites.[17] We have previously used the activity-based proteasome
probe MV151[18] containing a vinyl sulfone
to label the β2 and β5 subunits of the parasite proteasome.
However, we were unable to label the β1 subunit using this reagent.[16] In an effort to identify a more broad-spectrum
probe that would allow analysis of all three active sites, we synthesized
an activity-based probe BMV037 (Figure 1 A)
that contains an epoxyketone peptidic scaffold based on the recently
FDA-approved proteasome inhibitor Kyprolis (carfilzomib/PR171; Supporting Information Figure 1).[19] This probe contains epoxyketone as the electrophile
which covalently reacts with the active site threonine of all three
catalytic β-subunits. As this covalent interaction only occurs
in the presence of active enzyme, BMV037 can be used to directly assess
activity of the proteasome in both the purified Plasmodium 20S proteasome and native proteasome populations within parasite
lysates (Figure 1B). We find that BMV037 labeling
of the proteasome corresponds well to inhibition of model substrate
cleavage (Supporting Information Figure 2A). Furthermore, we were able to confirm the identity of each labeled
subunit by mass spectrometry (Figure 1C, D).
Pretreatment with inhibitors followed by incubation with the probe
allows us to simultaneously monitor activities of the three catalytic
subunits (Supporting Information Figure 2B and
C).
Figure 1
Activity-based probe BMV037 as a tool to monitor activity of multiple
β subunits of the Plasmodium proteasome. (A)
Structure of BMV037. The epoxyketone electrophile is shown in red
and the Cy5 fluorophore shown in blue. (B) Time dependent labeling
of the purified P. falciparum 20S proteasome and
schizont lysates by BMV037. The location of the β subunits is
based on mass spectrometry results shown below. (C and D) Mass spectrometry
analysis of labeled subunits of the P. falciparum 20S proteasome. Purified proteasome (20 nM) was incubated with 10
μM of BMV037 for 3 h, and analyzed by SDS PAGE. Left panel shows
coomassie stain, and right panel shows the same gel under fluorescent
scan. The gel was divided into 14 slices and protein content of each
slice was analyzed by mass spectrometry. Graph of spectral counts
of individual catalytic subunits: β1 (Unitprot: Q8I0U7), β2
(Uniprot: Q8I6T3), and β5 (Uniprot: Q8IJT1) in each gel slices
is shown.
Activity-based probe BMV037 as a tool to monitor activity of multiple
β subunits of the Plasmodium proteasome. (A)
Structure of BMV037. The epoxyketone electrophile is shown in red
and the Cy5 fluorophore shown in blue. (B) Time dependent labeling
of the purified P. falciparum 20S proteasome and
schizont lysates by BMV037. The location of the β subunits is
based on mass spectrometry results shown below. (C and D) Mass spectrometry
analysis of labeled subunits of the P. falciparum 20S proteasome. Purified proteasome (20 nM) was incubated with 10
μM of BMV037 for 3 h, and analyzed by SDS PAGE. Left panel shows
coomassie stain, and right panel shows the same gel under fluorescent
scan. The gel was divided into 14 slices and protein content of each
slice was analyzed by mass spectrometry. Graph of spectral counts
of individual catalytic subunits: β1 (Unitprot: Q8I0U7), β2
(Uniprot: Q8I6T3), and β5 (Uniprot: Q8IJT1) in each gel slices
is shown.
Subunit Selective Inhibitors
Highlight Differences between Host
and Parasite Proteasomes
Inhibitors that are selective for
each of the catalytic subunits of the mammalian proteasome have been
developed.[20] Therefore, we started by evaluating
these previously characterized inhibitors in the hopes that they could
be used for selective chemical knockdown of the Plasmodium proteasome catalytic subunits. In mammalian cells, NC001,[11] LU102,[21] and NC005-mvs[22] show highly selective inhibition of the β1,
β2 and β5 subunits, respectively. We treated live P. falciparum culture with these inhibitors for 1 h and
assessed the remaining proteasome activity by labeling the lysates
with BMV037 (Figure 2). Interestingly, we find
that only LU102 has a small degree of selectivity for the same β
subunit that it targets in the human proteasome. Although the selective
β2-targeting window for LU102 is narrow, it is the only inhibitor
we have identified that can selectively inhibit β2 activity
when used in live P. falciparum cultures. NC005-mvs
exclusively inhibits the mammalian β5 subunit up to 100 μM,
but surprisingly blocks all proteasome catalytic sites in P. falciparum at 40 μM (Figure 2, see also ref (22)). NC001 does not inhibit any of the parasite proteasome subunits
(Figure 2) at concentrations where it is capable
of complete and selective inhibition of the mammalian β1 activity.
We observed similar effects upon direct treatment of purified proteasomes
with NC001 (Supporting Information Figure 3). We also tested WL407, a recently reported epoxyketone inhibitor
that selectively inhibits the β1 subunit of the mammalian proteasome.[23] Again, we observed no inhibition of the parasite
β1 subunit (Supporting Information Figure
3). We have so far been unable to identify a proteasome inhibitor
that can selectively inhibit the Plasmodium β1
subunit in culture. β1 selective inhibitors are usually designed
with a P3 proline[11] or more recently, by
a valine-urea-valine motif.[23] We predict
that a kink or bend in the substrate pocket of the human proteasome
is missing in the S3 position of the β1 subunit in Plasmodium and hence inhibitors with this design are not accessible to the Plasmodium active site. Future work will focus on designing
inhibitors that can target the Plasmodium β1
site selectively.
Figure 2
Subunit selective mammalian proteasome inhibitors do not
retain
subunit selectivity in P. falciparum. (A) Structures
of the proteasome inhibitors. Intact human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF;
B) or intact P. falciparum schizonts (C) were treated
for 1 h with each inhibitor at the indicated final concentrations
at 37 °C followed by postlysis labeling with 10 μM BMV037
(for P. falciparum) or 2 μM MV151 (for HFF).
Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by scanning of the gels
for fluorescence using a flatbed laser scanner. The position of each
of the labeled active β subunits is indicated.
Subunit selective mammalian proteasome inhibitors do not
retain
subunit selectivity in P. falciparum. (A) Structures
of the proteasome inhibitors. Intact human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF;
B) or intact P. falciparum schizonts (C) were treated
for 1 h with each inhibitor at the indicated final concentrations
at 37 °C followed by postlysis labeling with 10 μM BMV037
(for P. falciparum) or 2 μM MV151 (for HFF).
Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by scanning of the gels
for fluorescence using a flatbed laser scanner. The position of each
of the labeled active β subunits is indicated.Differences in the S1 pocket of the host and parasite
proteasome
in all three catalytic subunits have been identified by sequence alignment.[17] Our data here suggests that the substrate binding
pockets of each of the catalytic subunits are significantly different
from the host. We find that inhibitors that are highly selective for
a particular subunit in mammalian proteasome often do not retain the
same exquisite subunit selectivity in the parasite proteasome. This
difference in cross-species subunit selectivity can be exploited for
design of proteasome inhibitors with selective parasite killing effects.
Inhibitors that can coinhibit all the catalytic subunits in Plasmodium, but only target one catalytic site in the host
proteasome would be highly potent antimalarials with low toxicity.
Selective β5 Inhibition during Schizogony Blocks Parasite
Replication
Since none of the mammalian proteasome inhibitors
tested so far showed selective inhibition of the parasite chymotrypsin-like
site, we assessed the proteasome inhibition profile of some recently
synthesized proteasome inhibitors containing non-natural amino acids[21] and a urea motif[23] in their structures. We identified the vinyl sulfonePR709A that
inhibited the β5 subunit in purified P. falciparum 20S proteasome without significant inhibition of the other subunits
(Figure 3A).
Figure 3
Selective inhibition of β5 subunit
during schizogony corresponds
to block in parasite replication. (A) Structure of PR709A. Inhibitor
competition assay for purified proteasomes (top) and intact cells
(bottom) are shown. All inhibitor treatment was performed for 1 h
at 37 °C followed by inhibitor washout and labeling with 10 μM
BMV037 (P. falciparum) or 2 μM MV151 (HFF).
(B) Quantification of residual proteasome β subunit activities
(black, blue, and red lines) compared to parasite viability relative
to control (schizont treatment; n = 6) upon treatment
with increasing doses of PR709A. (C) Similar data as part B but for
HFF cells treated with PR709A for 1 h. Cells were treated for 1 h
with inhibitor, followed by a washout period of 72 h after which viability
was determined (n = 3). Error bars represent standard
error of the mean (SEM).
Selective inhibition of β5 subunit
during schizogony corresponds
to block in parasite replication. (A) Structure of PR709A. Inhibitor
competition assay for purified proteasomes (top) and intact cells
(bottom) are shown. All inhibitor treatment was performed for 1 h
at 37 °C followed by inhibitor washout and labeling with 10 μM
BMV037 (P. falciparum) or 2 μM MV151 (HFF).
(B) Quantification of residual proteasome β subunit activities
(black, blue, and red lines) compared to parasite viability relative
to control (schizont treatment; n = 6) upon treatment
with increasing doses of PR709A. (C) Similar data as part B but for
HFF cells treated with PR709A for 1 h. Cells were treated for 1 h
with inhibitor, followed by a washout period of 72 h after which viability
was determined (n = 3). Error bars represent standard
error of the mean (SEM).In order to directly determine the effect of proteasome inhibition
on parasite growth, we treated infected erythrocytes with inhibitors
for 1 h, washed out the inhibitor, and then used the same compound
treated parasites to determine proteasome inhibition and parasite
growth. To assess effect on parasite growth, the culture is left to
grow for another cycle (∼48 h) before parasitemia is determined.
We treated Plasmodium cultures at a late stage in
the intraerythrocytic cycle (schizont; 36–48 h post invasion)
to ensure sufficient parasite numbers for proteasome labeling. We
first determined the effect of selective β5 inhibition in intact
parasites using the β5 selective inhibitor PR709A (Figure 3A). To our surprise, we found that the extent of
β5 subunit inhibition directly correlated with a decrease in
parasite growth suggesting that this subunit activity is essential
for the parasite (Figure 3B). To ensure that
the sensitivity to β5 inhibition was not compound specific,
we performed the same treatment using WL588, another β5 selective
compound that we identified with a smaller window of selectivity for
β5 than PR709A (Supporting Information Figure
4). WL588 is an epoxyketone, which has been shown to be highly
specific for the proteasome.[24,25] We observed a similar
reduction in schizont replication that corresponded with the inhibition
of the β5 activity (Supporting Information
Figure 4). This strongly suggests that the effect on parasite
growth upon inhibitor treatment is due to direct inhibition of the
β5 subunit.To assess the effect of PR709A in mammalian
cells, we performed
the same treatment as described above in human foreskin fibroblast
(HFFs). To our surprise, PR709A did not inhibit any proteasome subunits
and showed no cell toxicity up to 50 μM (Figure 3C). Extended treatment of nonconfluent HFFs with PR709A revealed
that this inhibitor is nontoxic to host cells even with continuous
72 h treatment (Table 1).
Table 1
EC50 of Prolonged Treatment of LU102
and PR709A in P. falciparum and HFFa
treatment
time (h)
P.
falciparum EC50 (μM)
HFF EC50 (μM)
selectivity (HFF/Pf)
LU102
24
0.252 ± 0.006
11.47 ± 0.033
46
72
0.170 ± 0.004
5.12 ± 0.12
30
PR709A
24
0.50 ± 0.02
245 ± 13
490
72
0.29 ± 0.01
165 ± 3
569
24 and 72 h treatment of ring stage
parasites are shown. For 24 h treatment, cells are treated, washed,
and placed in new media for a further 48 h of growth. EC50s are expressed
as mean ± standard deviation. Selectivity is determined as the
ratio of EC50 in HFF over EC50 in P. falciparum.
24 and 72 h treatment of ring stage
parasites are shown. For 24 h treatment, cells are treated, washed,
and placed in new media for a further 48 h of growth. EC50s are expressed
as mean ± standard deviation. Selectivity is determined as the
ratio of EC50 in HFF over EC50 in P. falciparum.To investigate whether the
observed sensitivity of parasites to
β5 subunit inhibition occurs at all stages in the intraerythrocytic
cycle of P. falciparum, we performed l h treatments
on synchronized cultures of rings (6–8 h post invasion (h.p.i.)),
trophozoites (28–30 h.p.i.), and schizonts (38–40 h.p.i.).
Although PR709A is highly selective for β5 subunit, we found
that this inhibitor has differential inhibition at different stages
of the blood cycle[26] (Supporting Information Figure 5). Thus, we used WL588 to assess
the effects of stage specific β5 inhibition. We observed that
each of the catalytic subunit was inhibited to a similar extent at
all 3 stages of the P. falciparum blood cycle (Supporting Information Table 1). At concentrations
of WL588 that inhibited 30% of the β5 subunit with no inhibition
of the other subunits, we found that only schizont viability was correspondingly
reduced. At concentrations that inhibited 50–60% of the β5
activity, the compound reduced growth of parasites at all three stages,
with schizonts showing the greatest sensitivity and trophozoites being
least sensitive to the compound (Supporting Information
Table 1).
Selective β2 Inhibition Does Not Affect Plasmodium Growth
To selectively inhibit the β2
subunit of the Plasmodium proteasome, we used LU102,
which is highly selective
for the human trypsin-like active site at concentrations up to 10
μM (Figure 2). In Plasmodium, LU102 treatment for 1 h selectively inhibits β2 when used
at concentrations up to 2 μM but the compound coinhibits β5
and β1 at higher concentrations (Figure 2). We find that with a short treatment of LU102 in live P.
falciparum schizont cultures, we achieve 50% inhibition of
the β2 activity with no significant inhibition of β5 or
β1, yet parasite growth was not affected (Figure 4A). This is similar to the effect of the compound on HFF cells,
where selective (and complete) block of β2 activity does not
affect cell viability (Figure 4B). From this,
we concluded that P. falciparum is not sensitive
to a short-term inhibition of β2 alone.
Figure 4
Selective inhibition
of β2 does not affect parasite growth,
but coinhibition of catalytic subunits at high concentration of LU102
blocks parasite replication at blood and liver stage. (A) Quantification
of residual proteasome β subunit activity as measured by BMV037
labeling in parasites treated for 1 h with LU102 (red, blue, and black
lines) compared to overall parasite viability as measured in parasite
replications assays (green line). (B) Same results as in part A,except
for intact HFF cells. Error bars represent standard error of the mean
(SEM) from n = 3. (C) Synchronized P. falciparum culture of schizonts, trophozoites, or rings were pulsed for 1 h
with 25 μM LU102 at 37 °C. For sporozoite treatment, Plasmodium berghei sporozoites freshly dissected from salivary
glands of infected mosquitoes were treated for 30 min at 20 °C
and then placed on HepG2 cells for invasion. Data is presented as
the percent of parasites relative to the DMSO control. Error bars
represent SEM from n = 3.
Selective inhibition
of β2 does not affect parasite growth,
but coinhibition of catalytic subunits at high concentration of LU102
blocks parasite replication at blood and liver stage. (A) Quantification
of residual proteasome β subunit activity as measured by BMV037
labeling in parasites treated for 1 h with LU102 (red, blue, and black
lines) compared to overall parasite viability as measured in parasite
replications assays (green line). (B) Same results as in part A,except
for intact HFF cells. Error bars represent standard error of the mean
(SEM) from n = 3. (C) Synchronized P. falciparum culture of schizonts, trophozoites, or rings were pulsed for 1 h
with 25 μM LU102 at 37 °C. For sporozoite treatment, Plasmodium berghei sporozoites freshly dissected from salivary
glands of infected mosquitoes were treated for 30 min at 20 °C
and then placed on HepG2 cells for invasion. Data is presented as
the percent of parasites relative to the DMSO control. Error bars
represent SEM from n = 3.
Sensitivity to Proteasome Inhibition Is Stage Specific
Given
that the sensitivity to selective β5 inhibition is only
prominent during Plasmodium schizogony, we hypothesized
that coinhibition of β5 with β2 and/or β1 should
attenuate parasite growth at other points in the parasite blood stage
life cycle. When P. falciparum culture was treated
with a concentration of LU102 that blocks all β subunits (25
μM), we found that parasites at all stages of the blood cycle
were effectively killed (Figure 4C). This complements
our previous report where we observed complete attenuation of ring
and trophozoite growth at high concentrations of proteasome inhibitors.[16] Furthermore, we observed a similar trend of
stage-specific sensitivity to inhibition of the proteasome subunits,
where schizonts were more susceptible than rings, which were more
susceptible than trophozoites. Higher doses of LU102 also completely
blocked Plasmodium berghei sporozoite development
in HepG2 liver cells (Figure 4C). Most importantly,
HFF viability was only slightly reduced by 1 h treatment with 25 μM
of LU102 (Figure 4B), as LU102 preferentially
targets β2 in mammalian cells.It is important to note
that there have been conflicting reports on schizont sensitivity to
proteasome inhibition. Some groups have observed that parasite growth
is only blocked when Plasmodium cultures are treated
at ring and trophozoite stages,[27] while
others have noted that proteasome inhibitors can attenuate growth
at all stages of the asexual life cycle.[28] We find that a short pulse of proteasome inhibition is able to attenuate Plasmodium growth at all stages of the blood cycle, although
the different stages have different sensitivity to proteasome inhibition.
In our experiments, we used a short pulse of inhibition to assess
effects on parasite growth at different stages instead of continuous
treatment as was reported by other groups. This is important, as most
reported proteasome inhibitors are covalent, irreversible inhibitors
and potency of inhibitors increases with time of incubation. As such,
the best way to compare effectiveness of proteasome inhibition on
a specific life stage of the parasite is to administer the same short,
noncontinuous treatment.
Inhibition of Multiple β Subunits Results
in Synergistic
Effects In Vivo
Given the promising initial in vitro culture studies of the proteasome inhibitors that
revealed a substantial therapeutic window (Table 1), we wanted to assess the effects of these compounds on parasite
growth in vivo. We used the rodent parasite Plasmodium chabaudi which possesses many traits similar
to P. falciparum, such as its synchronous growth
in the host and preference to invade mature red blood cells.[29,30]P. chabaudi naturally resolves after reaching peak
infection in day 7–8 postinfection. We assessed the effect
of PR709A in vivo by infecting Balb/c female mice
with 1 million P. chabaudi parasites
and treating with either vehicle (n = 4) or 50 mg/kg
of PR709A (n = 5) via intravenous injection for 3
consecutive days from day 2 to day 4 postinfection (Figure 5A). Mice were dosed during early schizont stage
of the parasite. We found that this treatment had a small, but statistically
significant, effect on reducing parasite replication in the host.
Importantly, the inhibitor was nontoxic to the host, even when used
at the relatively high dose of 50 mg/kg (Supporting
Information Figure 6).
Figure 5
In vivo assessment of subunit
selective inhibitors
in Plasmodium chabaudi mouse model of malaria. (A)
Infected Balb/c mice were treated with 50 mg/kg of PR709A (n = 5) or vehicle (n = 4) for 3 consecutive
days via tail vein injections starting from day 2 postinfection. Treatment
was administered at night. (B) P. chabaudi infected
Balb/c mice were treated with 20 mg/kg of LU102 (n = 4) or vehicle (n = 4) for 4 consecutive days
via i.v. injections. (C) Infected mice were treated with vehicle or
combination of LU102 and PR709A (n = 4 for each group),
at the indicated amounts. Compounds were administered at night. The
dosing schedule is indicated by the dots below the day. Percent parasitemia
was measured by blood smear counts and FACS analysis. (D) Plot of
data from panels A–C expressed as a percentage of the vehicle
treated mice (Color of each bar corresponds to the same color used
in A–C). Error bars represent SEM.
In vivo assessment of subunit
selective inhibitors
in Plasmodium chabaudimouse model of malaria. (A)
Infected Balb/c mice were treated with 50 mg/kg of PR709A (n = 5) or vehicle (n = 4) for 3 consecutive
days via tail vein injections starting from day 2 postinfection. Treatment
was administered at night. (B) P. chabaudi infected
Balb/c mice were treated with 20 mg/kg of LU102 (n = 4) or vehicle (n = 4) for 4 consecutive days
via i.v. injections. (C) Infected mice were treated with vehicle or
combination of LU102 and PR709A (n = 4 for each group),
at the indicated amounts. Compounds were administered at night. The
dosing schedule is indicated by the dots below the day. Percent parasitemia
was measured by blood smear counts and FACS analysis. (D) Plot of
data from panels A–C expressed as a percentage of the vehicle
treated mice (Color of each bar corresponds to the same color used
in A–C). Error bars represent SEM.We then assessed the effect of LU102, which has reduced toxicity
to the host due to its preferential targeting of the mammalian β2
subunit (Figure 4B). As described above, LU102
has a small window of selective β2 targeting in Plasmodium and coinhibits β5 and β1 at higher concentrations. We
infected Balb/c female mice with 1 million P. chabaudi parasites and treated them with either vehicle
(n = 4) or 20 mg/kg of LU102 (n =
4) via intravenous injection for four consecutive days from day 2
to day 5 postinfection (Figure 5B). LU102 treatment
significantly inhibited P. chabaudi growth with no
detectable host toxicity (Supporting Information
Figure 6). This treatment was also substantially more effective
at slowing parasite growth than treatment with 50 mg/kg of PR709A.As both PR709A and LU102 treatments did not cause apparent host
toxicity, we wanted to determine the effects of coinhibition of both
β5 and β2 subunits on P. chabaudi infection.
Since we believed that the enhanced parasite killing observed for
LU102 compared to PR709A was the result of its coinhibition of multiple
subunits, we reasoned that it might be more effective to use a combination
of LU102 and PR709A to ensure more complete inhibition of both β5
and β2 subunits. Therefore, we treated mice with PR709A (50
mg/kg) and LU102 (20 mg/kg) as a single bolus dose via tail-vein injection
1 day after infection. We observed a strong decrease in parasite replication
with this treatment even with just a single dose (Figure 5C and D). This treatment caused a small amount of
toxicity in the host as we observed reduced activity of the mice immediately
following the injections. However, the mice recovered normal activity
in less than a day. To reduce this apparent toxicity, we performed
the treatment at 50 mg/kg of PR709A and 10 mg/kg of LU102 as a single
dose that was injected i.v. on day 1, 3, and 5 postinfection. This
dose was able to reduce parasite replication in vivo with overall low toxicity as assessed by good general activity of
mice and insignificant weight loss over the period of treatment (Figure 5C and D; Supporting Information
Figure 6). For both cotreatment regimes, we observed close
to complete clearance of parasite load over the period of treatment
(Figure 5D). Moreover, we observed that the
mice that received either of the cotreatments had a much less severe
form of the infection, where the maximum parasitemia of the treated
mice never reached levels found in the vehicle treated animals (Figure 5C). Furthermore, the mice that received the cotreatments
lost substantially less weight over the course of infection (Supporting Information Figure 6). To our knowledge,
this is the first demonstration of proteasome inhibitors that can
dramatically reduce parasite load with no host morbidity and at minimal
toxicity.
Conclusion
The Plasmodium proteasome
has been validated as a potential antimalarial target, however, the
main obstacle to further drug development efforts is the significant
host toxicity caused by proteasome inhibitors that cotarget the mammalian
proteasome.[31] In the work presented here,
we first demonstrate that proteasome inhibitors often do not have
the same subunit-targeting profiles for the host and parasite proteasomes.
Furthermore, Plasmodium parasites undergoing schizogony
are highly sensitive to selective inhibition of the chymotrypsin-like
activity of the proteasome, a phenomenon that is not observed in mammalian
cells. However, not all stages of the parasite are equally sensitive
to proteasome inhibition, and the most significant parasite killing
results from coinhibition of multiple Plasmodium catalytic
proteasome subunits.We find P. falciparum’s
sensitivity to proteasome inhibition during schizogony especially
intriguing. We predict that this is due to a number of different factors.
This includes rapid nuclear division in schizogony, which makes parasites
especially susceptible to a block of proteasome-mediated regulation
of cell cycle factors. Synthesis of short-lived proteins involved
in nuclear division and subsequent cell division and egress from the
host cell[32] may also increase the burden
on the proteasome. This effect of increased proteasome burden is one
of the underlying reasons for the heightened sensitivity to proteasome
inhibition in multiple myeloma cells.[33] Finally, since proteasome transcription reaches a maximum during
late-trophozoite stage,[32] it is possible
that proteasomes that are inhibited during the schizont stage are
not readily replenished thus causing difficulties for parasite egress
from the host cell.With an understanding of the catalytic subunits
that are important
for parasite survival, we can now devise an optimal strategy for designing
highly potent Plasmodium proteasome inhibitors that
are able to selectively kill parasites. Schizont growth can be selectively
attenuated with inhibition of β5 alone. For inhibition at all
stages in the blood cycle, coinhibition of β5 with β2
and/or β1 is required for maximum killing. We have shown here
that mammalian proteasome inhibitors that target just one catalytic
proteasome site often can coinhibit several catalytic subunits of
the Plasmodium proteasome at the same concentration.
This, together with nontransformed and endogenous nonreplicating mammalian
cells’ high resistance to short-term proteasome inhibition,[34] allow us to use proteasome inhibitors as antimalarial
therapeutic at low host toxicity.In conclusion, we have used
subunit selective proteasome inhibitors
and a proteasome activity based probe to determine subunit dependency
of the Plasmodium proteasome. With this new roadmap
for how to effectively target parasites with proteasome inhibitors,
our future work will focus on optimizing inhibitors that target multiple
catalytic subunits in the parasite proteasome while showing weak binding
to the host proteasome.
Methods
Additional
details and sections are available in Supporting
Information. Synthetic procedures for NC001,[11] LU102,[21] NC005-mvs,[22] PR709A,[21] and WL407[23] have been previously reported.
Activity-Based Probe Labeling
of Mammalian and Parasite Lysates
Synthesis of BMV037 is
described in Supporting
Information. For all lysates or purified proteasome labeling
experiments, MV151 was used at a final concentration of 2 μM
and BMV037 was used at a final concentration of 10 μM. Lysates
or purified proteasome were incubated with MV151 at 37 °C for
1 h, or BMV037 for 3 h at 37 °C. Samples were denatured by addition
of SDS sample buffer, boiled briefly, and run on a 12% SDS PAGE. Gels
were scanned at the TAMRA channel (for MV151) or Cy5 channel (for
BMV037) on a Typhoon Scanner (GE Healthcare). Quantification of the
intensity of the labeled proteins was done using ImageJ. A positive
control was included in all experiments to allow background subtraction
of the labeled subunits.
Parasite Culture, Harvesting of Life Cycle
Stages, and Lysate
Preparation
P. falciparum D10 cultures were
maintained, synchronized, and lysed, as previously described.[16] Tightly synchronized parasites for stage specificity
experiments were obtained by enriching for mature schizonts on a 70%
Percoll gradient followed by sorbitol treatment to a ∼2 h window
of synchrony.
Correlation of P. falciparum Proteasome Activity
to Viability
P. falciparum was cultured
at around 15–25% parasitemia at 1% hematocrit to ensure sufficient
parasite was available for proteasome labeling. P. falciparum culture (500 μL per well) was first treated for the indicated
amount of time, and spun down at 3200 rpm for 3 min and supernatant
aspirated to remove inhibitor. Culture was then washed 2 times in
fresh media, and resuspended in 500 μL of media. This culture
(20 μL) was added to 180 uL of 1% hematocrit, thus diluting
the parasitemia 10-fold to allow for the parasites to reinvade. Parasitemia
was assessed after 48–60 h when parasites were at late trophozoites/early
schizonts. The remaining inhibitor-treated culture was spun down,
and parasite lysate was prepared and labeled with activity-based probe,
as described above.
In Vivo Assessment of Proteasome
Inhibitors
All mouse experiments were approved by the Stanford
Administration
Panel on Laboratory Animal Care and we strictly followed their specific
guidelines. For each drug test, Balb/c mice (∼20 g) were infected
by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection with 1 × 106P. chabaudi parasites isolated from an infected mouse on
Day 0. Drug dose and formulation are described in Supporting Information. All treatment groups were closely
monitored for drug-induced toxicity by observing physical appearance
and activities of mice. Weight of mice was also monitored daily after
infection. Parasitemia was monitored daily by thin blood smear obtained
from the tail vein and quantified by light microscope counting and
FACS.
Authors: Anne C Mirabella; Alexandre A Pletnev; Sondra L Downey; Bogdan I Florea; Tamer B Shabaneh; Matthew Britton; Martijn Verdoes; Dmitri V Filippov; Herman S Overkleeft; Alexei F Kisselev Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2011-05-27
Authors: Li Liu; Hope L Johnson; Simon Cousens; Jamie Perin; Susana Scott; Joy E Lawn; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Richard Cibulskis; Mengying Li; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jacques Prudhomme; Eric McDaniel; Nadia Ponts; Stéphane Bertani; William Fenical; Paul Jensen; Karine Le Roch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Shreeya Garg; Oriana Kreutzfeld; Sevil Chelebieva; Patrick K Tumwebaze; Oswald Byaruhanga; Martin Okitwi; Stephen Orena; Thomas Katairo; Samuel L Nsobya; Melissa D Conrad; Ozkan Aydemir; Jennifer Legac; Alexandra E Gould; Brett R Bayles; Jeffrey A Bailey; Maelle Duffey; Gang Lin; Laura A Kirkman; Roland A Cooper; Philip J Rosenthal Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 5.938
Authors: Alexandra S Lubin; Ainoa Rueda-Zubiaurre; Holly Matthews; Hella Baumann; Fabio R Fisher; Julia Morales-Sanfrutos; Kate S Hadavizadeh; Flore Nardella; Edward W Tate; Jake Baum; Artur Scherf; Matthew J Fuchter Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 5.084
Authors: Euna Yoo; Barbara H Stokes; Hanna de Jong; Manu Vanaerschot; Trs Kumar; Nina Lawrence; Mathew Njoroge; Arnold Garcia; Renier Van der Westhuyzen; Jeremiah D Momper; Caroline L Ng; David A Fidock; Matthew Bogyo Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Con Dogovski; Stanley C Xie; Gaetan Burgio; Jess Bridgford; Sachel Mok; James M McCaw; Kesinee Chotivanich; Shannon Kenny; Nina Gnädig; Judith Straimer; Zbynek Bozdech; David A Fidock; Julie A Simpson; Arjen M Dondorp; Simon Foote; Nectarios Klonis; Leann Tilley Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Hao Li; Anthony J O'Donoghue; Wouter A van der Linden; Stanley C Xie; Euna Yoo; Ian T Foe; Leann Tilley; Charles S Craik; Paula C A da Fonseca; Matthew Bogyo Journal: Nature Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 49.962