BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux has been suggested to play a role in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoO). Oesophageal acid exposure decreases baseline intraluminal impedance, a marker of mucosal integrity, in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess oesophageal baseline impedance levels in EoO patients and to investigate their relationship with oesophageal acid exposure. METHODS: Ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring was performed in 11 EoO patients and in 11 healthy controls with matched oesophageal acid exposure. We assessed baseline impedance levels in the distal, mid-, and proximal oesophageal impedance channels. RESULTS: BASELINE IMPEDANCE LEVELS IN EOO PATIENTS WERE MARKEDLY LOWER COMPARED TO CONTROLS IN THE DISTAL OESOPHAGUS (MEDIAN (INTERQUARTILE RANGE): 988 (757-1978) vs. 2259 (1767-2896) Ω, p = 0.015), mid-oesophagus (1420 (836-2164) vs. 2614 (2374-3879) Ω, p = 0.003), and proximal oesophagus (1856 (1006-2625) vs. 2868 (2397-3439) Ω, p = 0.005). Whereas baseline impedance decreased from proximal to distal in healthy subjects (p = 0.037), no such gradient was seen in EoO patients (p = 0.123). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the oesophagus, baseline impedance values are decreased in EoO patients, indicating impaired mucosal integrity. Our findings suggest that factors other than acid reflux are the cause of low baseline impedance in EoO.
BACKGROUND: Gastro-oesophageal reflux has been suggested to play a role in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoO). Oesophageal acid exposure decreases baseline intraluminal impedance, a marker of mucosal integrity, in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess oesophageal baseline impedance levels in EoO patients and to investigate their relationship with oesophageal acid exposure. METHODS: Ambulatory 24-h pH-impedance monitoring was performed in 11 EoO patients and in 11 healthy controls with matched oesophageal acid exposure. We assessed baseline impedance levels in the distal, mid-, and proximal oesophageal impedance channels. RESULTS: BASELINE IMPEDANCE LEVELS IN EOO PATIENTS WERE MARKEDLY LOWER COMPARED TO CONTROLS IN THE DISTAL OESOPHAGUS (MEDIAN (INTERQUARTILE RANGE): 988 (757-1978) vs. 2259 (1767-2896) Ω, p = 0.015), mid-oesophagus (1420 (836-2164) vs. 2614 (2374-3879) Ω, p = 0.003), and proximal oesophagus (1856 (1006-2625) vs. 2868 (2397-3439) Ω, p = 0.005). Whereas baseline impedance decreased from proximal to distal in healthy subjects (p = 0.037), no such gradient was seen in EoO patients (p = 0.123). CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the oesophagus, baseline impedance values are decreased in EoO patients, indicating impaired mucosal integrity. Our findings suggest that factors other than acid reflux are the cause of low baseline impedance in EoO.
Authors: M J Shaw; N J Talley; T J Beebe; T Rockwood; R Carlsson; S Adlis; A M Fendrick; R Jones; J Dent; P Bytzer Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: S Roman; I Hirano; M A Kwiatek; N Gonsalves; J Chen; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Carine Blanchard; Emily M Stucke; Karen Burwinkel; Julie M Caldwell; Margaret H Collins; Annette Ahrens; Bridget K Buckmeier; Sean C Jameson; Allison Greenberg; Ajay Kaul; James P Franciosi; Jonathan P Kushner; Lisa J Martin; Philip E Putnam; J Pablo Abonia; Suzanne I Wells; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-03-05 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Chris A Liacouras; Glenn T Furuta; Ikuo Hirano; Dan Atkins; Stephen E Attwood; Peter A Bonis; A Wesley Burks; Mirna Chehade; Margaret H Collins; Evan S Dellon; Ranjan Dohil; Gary W Falk; Nirmala Gonsalves; Sandeep K Gupta; David A Katzka; Alfredo J Lucendo; Jonathan E Markowitz; Richard J Noel; Robert D Odze; Philip E Putnam; Joel E Richter; Yvonne Romero; Eduardo Ruchelli; Hugh A Sampson; Alain Schoepfer; Nicholas J Shaheen; Scott H Sicherer; Stuart Spechler; Jonathan M Spergel; Alex Straumann; Barry K Wershil; Marc E Rothenberg; Seema S Aceves Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Xi Zhang; Edaire Cheng; Xiaofang Huo; Chunhua Yu; Qiuyang Zhang; Thai H Pham; David H Wang; Stuart J Spechler; Rhonda F Souza Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: E V Marietta; D M Geno; T C Smyrk; A Becker; J A Alexander; M Camilleri; J A Murray; D A Katzka Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Bram D van Rhijn; Joanne Verheij; Marius A van den Bergh Weerman; Caroline Verseijden; René M J G J van den Wijngaard; Wouter J de Jonge; Andreas J P M Smout; Albert J Bredenoord Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: N Nguyen; S D Fernando; K A Biette; J A Hammer; K E Capocelli; D A Kitzenberg; L E Glover; S P Colgan; G T Furuta; J C Masterson Journal: Mucosal Immunol Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 7.313