PURPOSE: To search the place of non contrast abdominal computed tomography to detect the stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and the clinical importance of its superiority against to plain film radiography (KUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and July 2010, 62 patients including 27 women had no stone detected peroperative fluoroscopy and nephroscopy during PNL were included. Patients whom stone was not detected under 5 mm section upper abdomen non contrast spiral CT and KUB control in postoperative day 3 were defined as Group 1; patients whom stone was detected in a single slice CT were defined as clinically insignificant fragment (CIF)(Group 2) and patients whom stone was detected at least in two slice were defined as rest fragment (Group 3). RESULTS: Median stone size were 22.3 mm (19-37 mm). Preoperative stone localization of groups were upper calyx, middle calyx, pelvis, lower calyx and 2.1, 14.9, 25.5 and 57.4%, respectively. CIF was detected in postoperative CT control of 12 (25.5%) patients whom stone was not followed in KUB and rest fragment was detected in 6 (12.8%) patients. Three of patients whom rest fragment was detected required an additional intervention for stone. CONCLUSION: KUB which is routinely used to determine stone-free ratio after PNL operation is not sufficient to detect rest calculi and/or CIF existence in 38.3% patients. But when it is considered that most of rest stones detected were CIF and only 6.3% patients had additional intervention required rest calculi. We can think that CT follow-up is not absolutely required.
PURPOSE: To search the place of non contrast abdominal computed tomography to detect the stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and the clinical importance of its superiority against to plain film radiography (KUB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and July 2010, 62 patients including 27 women had no stone detected peroperative fluoroscopy and nephroscopy during PNL were included. Patients whom stone was not detected under 5 mm section upper abdomen non contrast spiral CT and KUB control in postoperative day 3 were defined as Group 1; patients whom stone was detected in a single slice CT were defined as clinically insignificant fragment (CIF)(Group 2) and patients whom stone was detected at least in two slice were defined as rest fragment (Group 3). RESULTS: Median stone size were 22.3 mm (19-37 mm). Preoperative stone localization of groups were upper calyx, middle calyx, pelvis, lower calyx and 2.1, 14.9, 25.5 and 57.4%, respectively. CIF was detected in postoperative CT control of 12 (25.5%) patients whom stone was not followed in KUB and rest fragment was detected in 6 (12.8%) patients. Three of patients whom rest fragment was detected required an additional intervention for stone. CONCLUSION: KUB which is routinely used to determine stone-free ratio after PNL operation is not sufficient to detect rest calculi and/or CIF existence in 38.3% patients. But when it is considered that most of rest stones detected were CIF and only 6.3% patients had additional intervention required rest calculi. We can think that CT follow-up is not absolutely required.
Authors: Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: G Bozzini; P Verze; D Arcaniolo; O Dal Piaz; N M Buffi; G Guazzoni; M Provenzano; B Osmolorskij; F Sanguedolce; E Montanari; N Macchione; K Pummer; V Mirone; M De Sio; G Taverna Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 4.226