Literature DB >> 24917717

Place of non contrast thin-slice spiral computed tomography in evaluation of stone-free ratio after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Bayram Guner1, Cenk Gurbuz2, Lutfi Canat2, Turhan Caskurlu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To search the place of non contrast abdominal computed tomography to detect the stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and the clinical importance of its superiority against to plain film radiography (KUB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and July 2010, 62 patients including 27 women had no stone detected peroperative fluoroscopy and nephroscopy during PNL were included. Patients whom stone was not detected under 5 mm section upper abdomen non contrast spiral CT and KUB control in postoperative day 3 were defined as Group 1; patients whom stone was detected in a single slice CT were defined as clinically insignificant fragment (CIF)(Group 2) and patients whom stone was detected at least in two slice were defined as rest fragment (Group 3).
RESULTS: Median stone size were 22.3 mm (19-37 mm). Preoperative stone localization of groups were upper calyx, middle calyx, pelvis, lower calyx and 2.1, 14.9, 25.5 and 57.4%, respectively. CIF was detected in postoperative CT control of 12 (25.5%) patients whom stone was not followed in KUB and rest fragment was detected in 6 (12.8%) patients. Three of patients whom rest fragment was detected required an additional intervention for stone.
CONCLUSION: KUB which is routinely used to determine stone-free ratio after PNL operation is not sufficient to detect rest calculi and/or CIF existence in 38.3% patients. But when it is considered that most of rest stones detected were CIF and only 6.3% patients had additional intervention required rest calculi. We can think that CT follow-up is not absolutely required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Fluoroscopy; Kidney stone; Percutaneous nephrolithtomy

Year:  2012        PMID: 24917717      PMCID: PMC3783333          DOI: 10.1159/000343512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol        ISSN: 1661-7649


  10 in total

1.  Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  M S Pearle; L M Watamull; M A Mullican
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update.

Authors:  Samuel C Kim; Ramsay L Kuo; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  J A Levine; J Neitlich; M Verga; N Dalrymple; R C Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy versus expectant management.

Authors:  Jay D Raman; Aditya Bagrodia; Karim Bensalah; Margaret S Pearle; Yair Lotan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Computed tomography after percutaneous renal stone extraction.

Authors:  K Geterud; C Henriksson; S Pettersson; B F Zachrisson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy.

Authors:  J D Denstedt; R V Clayman; D D Picus
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Ureteral stenting and urinary stone management: a systematic review.

Authors:  George Haleblian; Kittinut Kijvikai; Jean de la Rosette; Glenn Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  Yasser Osman; Nasr El-Tabey; Hoda Refai; Ahmed Elnahas; Ahmed Shoma; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud Kenawy; Hamdy El-Kapany
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; James E Lingeman; Raymond Leveillee; Ramsay Kuo; Glenn M Preminger; Robert B Nadler; Joseph Macaluso; Manoj Monga; Udaya Kumar; John Dushinski; David M Albala; J Stuart Wolf; Dean Assimos; Michael Fabrizio; Larry C Munch; Stephen Y Nakada; Brian Auge; John Honey; Kenneth Ogan; John Pattaras; Elspeth M McDougall; Timothy D Averch; Thomas Turk; Paul Pietrow; Stephanie Watkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Urinary stone size: comparison of abdominal plain radiography and noncontrast CT measurements.

Authors:  J Kellogg Parsons; Vanessa Lancini; Kedar Shetye; Finton Regan; Steven R Potter; Thomas W Jarrett
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.942

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of intraoperative assessment and postoperative non-contrast computerized tomography.

Authors:  Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Osman; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Amr A Elsawy; Islam Fakhreldin; Osama Mahmoud; Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed A Shokeir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Uncovering the real outcomes of active renal stone treatment by utilizing non-contrast computer tomography: a systematic review of the current literature.

Authors:  Theodoros Tokas; Martin Habicher; Daniel Junker; Thomas Herrmann; Jan Peter Jessen; Thomas Knoll; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.

Authors:  G Bozzini; P Verze; D Arcaniolo; O Dal Piaz; N M Buffi; G Guazzoni; M Provenzano; B Osmolorskij; F Sanguedolce; E Montanari; N Macchione; K Pummer; V Mirone; M De Sio; G Taverna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.