Literature DB >> 24917414

Effects of flecainide on left ventricular pressure gradient and symptoms in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a comparison of flecainide and disopyramide.

Shintaro Haruki1, Yuichiro Minami2, Atsushi Suzuki1, Nobuhisa Hagiwara1.   

Abstract

It remains unclear whether flecainide, a Class I antiarrhythmic drug, improves left ventricular pressure gradient (LVPG) or symptoms in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Our study evaluated the long-term efficacy of flecainide, compared to disopyramide, when administered orally, on LVPG and symptoms in obstructive HCM patients. Among 164 obstructive HCM patients, 15 were administered oral flecainide therapy and 33 administered oral disopyramide therapy. LVPG declined from 79.8 ± 36.6 to 39.2 ± 36.7 mmHg (p = 0.003) after flecainide therapy and from 74.5 ± 26.4 to 31.4 ± 24.8 mmHg (p < 0.001) after disopyramide therapy. The percent reduction in LVPG was -47.9 ± 43.2 % in patients treated with flecainide, comparable to the results for those treated with disopyramide (-57.1 ± 33.0 %; p = 0.425). We found no significant differences in improvement in NYHA functional class between patients treated with flecainide and those treated with disopyramide (p = 0.331). Patients treated with flecainide exhibited no significant adverse side effects, and there was no need for myectomy or alcohol septal ablation to reduce LVPG and symptoms. Improvements in LVPG and symptoms were similar in patients treated with flecainide and patients treated with disopyramide, suggesting that flecainide is a potentially useful alternative for symptomatic obstructive HCM patients, particularly those with disopyramide-induced vagolytic side effects, narrow angle glaucoma, or prostatic hyperplasia and pre-existing urination difficulties. Our data must be viewed with caution, however, in view of the small number of study patients. Flecainide therapy will require further proof of safety before it can be routinely recommended in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiarrhythmic agents; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Obstruction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24917414     DOI: 10.1007/s00380-014-0534-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Vessels        ISSN: 0910-8327            Impact factor:   2.037


  30 in total

1.  Risk of sudden death in end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hirotaka Kawarai; Katsuya Kajimoto; Yuichiro Minami; Nobuhisa Hagiwara; Hiroshi Kasanuki
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 5.712

2.  Extracardiac adverse effects of flecainide.

Authors:  G D Gentzkow; J Y Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-02-27       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Muscular subaortic stenosis: hemodynamic and clinical improvement after disopyramide.

Authors:  C Pollick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Mechanism of benefit of negative inotropes in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  M V Sherrid; G Pearle; D Z Gunsburg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998 Jan 6-13       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  High signal intensity on T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging correlates with the ventricular tachyarrhythmia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Yasuki Hen; Nobuo Iguchi; Haruhiko Machida; Kaori Takada; Yuko Utanohara; Tetsuya Sumiyoshi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Mortality following ventricular arrhythmia suppression by encainide, flecainide, and moricizine after myocardial infarction. The original design concept of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST).

Authors:  A E Epstein; A P Hallstrom; W J Rogers; P R Liebson; A A Seals; J L Anderson; J D Cohen; R J Capone; D G Wyse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Comparison of acute reduction in left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by disopyramide versus pilsicainide versus cibenzoline.

Authors:  Katsuya Kajimoto; Taku Imai; Yuichiro Minami; Hiroshi Kasanuki
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Effects of intravenous disopyramide on coronary hemodynamics and vasodilator reserve in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  M Hongo; T Nakatsuka; H Takenaka; M Tanaka; N Watanabe; Y Yazaki; M Sekiguchi
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.869

10.  Mutations in the cardiac troponin T gene show various prognoses in Japanese patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Etsuko Fujita; Toshio Nakanishi; Tsutomu Nishizawa; Nobuhisa Hagiwara; Rumiko Matsuoka
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.