BACKGROUND: The number of lymph nodes required for accurate staging after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is unknown. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 1,473 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1998 to 2010. We evaluated the influence of the total number of lymph nodes examined (NNE) and the lymph node ratio (LNR-positive nodes/total nodes examined) on survival. RESULTS: The median NNE was 8. No nodes were examined in 232 (16%) of the patients, and 843 (57%) had <10 NNE. Of the patients who had at least one node examined, 612 (49%) were node positive. In the node-negative subset, the median and 5-year overall survival for patients with ≤10 NNE was significantly worse than patients with >10 NNE (16 vs. 20 months and 13 vs. 19%, respectively, p < 0.011). For node-positive patients, those with LNR ≤0.1 had better 5-year overall survival compared with LNR >0.1 (17 vs. 6%, p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing distal pancreatectomy should ideally have at least 11 lymph nodes examined to avoid understaging. For node-positive patients, LNR may be a better prognostic indicator than the total number of positive nodes.
BACKGROUND: The number of lymph nodes required for accurate staging after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is unknown. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 1,473 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1998 to 2010. We evaluated the influence of the total number of lymph nodes examined (NNE) and the lymph node ratio (LNR-positive nodes/total nodes examined) on survival. RESULTS: The median NNE was 8. No nodes were examined in 232 (16%) of the patients, and 843 (57%) had <10 NNE. Of the patients who had at least one node examined, 612 (49%) were node positive. In the node-negative subset, the median and 5-year overall survival for patients with ≤10 NNE was significantly worse than patients with >10 NNE (16 vs. 20 months and 13 vs. 19%, respectively, p < 0.011). For node-positive patients, those with LNR ≤0.1 had better 5-year overall survival compared with LNR >0.1 (17 vs. 6%, p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing distal pancreatectomy should ideally have at least 11 lymph nodes examined to avoid understaging. For node-positive patients, LNR may be a better prognostic indicator than the total number of positive nodes.
Authors: Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Daniel Borja-Cacho; Waddah B Al-Refaie; Selwyn M Vickers; Todd M Tuttle; Eric H Jensen Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-10-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jae Hoon Lee; Kyeong Geun Lee; Tae Kyung Ha; Young Jin Jun; Seung Sam Paik; Hwon Kyum Park; Kwang Soo Lee Journal: Am Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: T M Breslin; K R Hess; D B Harbison; M E Jean; K R Cleary; A P Dackiw; R A Wolff; J L Abbruzzese; N A Janjan; C H Crane; J N Vauthey; J E Lee; P W Pisters; D B Evans Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Steven L Chen; Scott R Steele; John Eberhardt; Kangmin Zhu; Anton Bilchik; Alexander Stojadinovic Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jennifer F Tseng; Chandrajit P Raut; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W T Pisters; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Eddie K Abdalla; Henry F Gomez; Charlotte C Sun; Christopher H Crane; Robert A Wolff; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Madeline T Olson; Nicholas E Wojtynek; Geoffrey A Talmon; Thomas C Caffrey; Prakash Radhakrishnan; Quan P Ly; Michael A Hollingsworth; Aaron M Mohs Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Kai Mao; Jieqiong Liu; Jian Sun; Jianlong Zhang; Jie Chen; Timothy M Pawlik; Lisa K Jacobs; Zhiyu Xiao; Jie Wang Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Daniel Delitto; Brian S Black; Holly B Cunningham; Sarunas Sliesoraitis; Xiaomin Lu; Chen Liu; George A Sarosi; Ryan M Thomas; Jose G Trevino; Steven J Hughes; Thomas J George; Kevin E Behrns Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Fabio Bagante; Thuy Tran; Gaya Spolverato; Andrea Ruzzenente; Stefan Buttner; Cecilia G Ethun; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Simone Conci; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Gerardo Vitiello; Jan N M IJzermans; Shishir K Maithel; George Poultsides; Alfredo Guglielmi; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 6.113