Literature DB >> 24916194

Whatever happened to the 'mad, bad' scientist? Overturning the stereotype.

Roslynn D Haynes1.   

Abstract

The cluster of myths relating to the pursuit of knowledge has perpetuated the archetype of the alchemist/scientist as sinister, dangerous, possibly mad and threatening to society's values. Shelley's Frankenstein provided imagery and a vocabulary universally invoked in relation to scientific discoveries and technological innovation. The reasons for the longevity of this seemingly antiquated, semiotic imagery are discussed. In the twenty-first century, this stereotype has been radically revised, even overturned. Scientists are now rarely objects of fear or mockery. Mathematicians, both real-life and fictional, are discussed here as being representative of scientists now depicted empathically. This article examines possible sociological reasons for this reversal; what the revisionist image suggests about society's changed attitudes to science; and what might be the substitute fears and sources of horror.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frankenstein; alchemist; communication; environment; evil scientists; mathematicians in fiction; myth; semiotic characters; ‘mad scientist’

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24916194     DOI: 10.1177/0963662514535689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  6 in total

1.  Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.

Authors:  Peter Nagy; Ruth Wylie; Joey Eschrich; Ed Finn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Genetics in Film and TV, 1912-2020.

Authors:  Ethan Gibbons; Isaac Stovall; Jay Clayton
Journal:  J Lit Sci       Date:  2021

3.  Novel Reflections on the Autonomy and Responsibility of Science.

Authors:  Fabian Hempel
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2021-07-05

4.  Ethical Concerns About Human Genetic Enhancement in the Malay Science Fiction Novels.

Authors:  Noor Munirah Isa; Muhammad Fakhruddin Hj Safian Shuri
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Treating rare diseases with the cinema: Can popular movies enhance public understanding of rare diseases?

Authors:  Jan Domaradzki
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 4.123

6.  Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus: a classic novel to stimulate the analysis of complex contemporary issues in biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Irene Cambra-Badii; Elena Guardiola; Josep-E Baños
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.652

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.