Literature DB >> 33622293

Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus: a classic novel to stimulate the analysis of complex contemporary issues in biomedical sciences.

Irene Cambra-Badii1, Elena Guardiola2, Josep-E Baños2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in biomedicine can substantially change human life. However, progress is not always followed by ethical reflection on its consequences or scientists' responsibility for their creations. The humanities can help health sciences students learn to critically analyse these issues; in particular, literature can aid discussions about ethical principles in biomedical research. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus (1818) is an example of a classic novel presenting complex scenarios that could be used to stimulate discussion. MAIN TEXT: Within the framework of the 200th anniversary of the novel, we searched PubMed to identify works that explore and discuss its value in teaching health sciences. Our search yielded 56 articles, but only two of these reported empirical findings. Our analysis of these articles identified three main approaches to using Frankenstein in teaching health sciences: discussing the relationship between literature and science, analysing ethical issues in biomedical research, and examining the importance of empathy and compassion in healthcare and research. After a critical discussion of the articles, we propose using Frankenstein as a teaching tool to prompt students to critically analyse ethical aspects of scientific and technological progress, the need for compassion and empathy in medical research, and scientists' responsibility for their discoveries.
CONCLUSION: Frankenstein can help students reflect on the personal and social limits of science, the connection between curiosity and scientific progress, and scientists' responsibilities. Its potential usefulness in teaching derives from the interconnectedness of science, ethics, and compassion. Frankenstein can be a useful tool for analysing bioethical issues related to scientific and technological advances, such as artificial intelligence, genetic engineering, and cloning. Empirical studies measuring learning outcomes are necessary to confirm the usefulness of this approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics; Frankenstein; Health sciences; Science fiction; Scientists’ responsibility; Teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622293      PMCID: PMC7903598          DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00586-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Ethics        ISSN: 1472-6939            Impact factor:   2.652


  42 in total

1.  Medicine and literature: writing and reading.

Authors:  Gillie Bolton
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  [Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Bram Stoker's Dracula: gender and science in literature].

Authors:  L de La Rocque
Journal:  Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos       Date:  2001 Mar-Jun

3.  "Inhumanly brought back to life and misery": Mary Wollstonecraft, Frankenstein, and the Royal Humane Society.

Authors:  C Williams
Journal:  Womens Writ       Date:  2001

Review 4.  Can narrative medicine education contribute to the delivery of compassionate care? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Sarah Barber; Carlos J Moreno-Leguizamon
Journal:  Med Humanit       Date:  2017-04-06

5.  Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.

Authors:  Peter Nagy; Ruth Wylie; Joey Eschrich; Ed Finn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 6.  Empathy present and future.

Authors:  Judith A Hall; Rachel Schwartz
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-06-18

7.  Literature and medicine: evaluating a special study module using the nominal group technique.

Authors:  Tim Lancaster; Ruth Hart; Selena Gardner
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  The long shadow of Frankenstein.

Authors:  Kai Kupferschmidt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The "makyng" and re-making of man: 1. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and transplant surgery.

Authors:  M G Bishop
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Medical professionalism: what the study of literature can contribute to the conversation.

Authors:  Johanna Shapiro; Lois L Nixon; Stephen E Wear; David J Doukas
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 2.464

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Fictional Film in Engineering Ethics Education: With Miyazaki's The Wind Rises as Exemplar.

Authors:  Sarah Jayne Hitt; Thomas Taro Lennerfors
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.777

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.