| Literature DB >> 24915522 |
Gui-Hua Zhang1, Zhi-Jun Yuan1, Chuan-Xi Zhang2, Kun-Shan Yin1, Mei-Jun Tang1, Hua-Wei Guo1, Jian-Yu Fu1, Qiang Xiao1.
Abstract
The tea geometrid (Ectropis obliqua Prout, Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is a dominant chewing insect endemic in most tea-growing areas in China. Recently some E. obliqua populations have been found to be resistant to the nucleopolyhedrovirus (EoNPV), a host-specific virus that has so far been found only in E. obliqua. Although the resistant populations are morphologically indistinguishable from susceptible populations, we conducted a nationwide collection and examined the genetic divergence in the COI region of the mtDNA in E. obliqua. Phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA in 17 populations revealed two divergent clades with genetic distance greater than 3.7% between clades and less than 0.7% within clades. Therefore, we suggest that E. obliqua falls into two distinct groups. Further inheritance analyses using reciprocal single-pair mating showed an abnormal F₁ generation with an unbalanced sex ratio and the inability to produce fertile eggs (or any eggs) through F1 self-crossing. These data revealed a potential cryptic species complex with deep divergence and reproductive isolation within E. obliqua. Uneven distribution of the groups suggests a possible geographic effect on the divergence. Future investigations will be conducted to examine whether EoNPV selection or other factors prompted the evolution of resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24915522 PMCID: PMC4051655 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The location of sampled E. obliqua populations.
Four populations of Clade I (square) were sampled from Hangzhou (HZ), Yuhang (YH), Langxi (LX) and Yixing (YX); thirteen populations of Clade II (closed circle) were sampled from Xiangfan (XF), Changsha (CS), Yangzhou (YZ), Enshi (ES), Quzhou (QZ), Jiujiang (JJ), Wuhan (WH), Songyang (SY), Wuyishan (WYS), Qianshan (QS), Xinyang (XY), Wuyi (WY) and Longyou (LY) in Chinese tea production areas.
Samples and collection information used in this study.
| Populations | Code | Collecting locality | Longitude°(E)/Latitude°(N) | Collecting date (M/Y) | Clade (I/II) |
| Hangzhou | HZ | Hangzhou/Zhejiang | 120.10/30.16 | 6/2011 | I |
| Yuhang | YH | Yuhang/Zhejiang | 119.90/30.39 | 5/2012 | I |
| Langxi | LX | Langxi/Anhui | 119.13/30.98 | 6/2011 | I |
| Yixing | YX | Yixing/Jiangsu | 119.67/31.34 | 6/2011 | I |
| Quzhou | QZ | Quzhou/Zhejiang | 118.88/28.97 | 6/2011 | II |
| Songyang | SY | Songyang/Zhejiang | 119.42/28.49 | 5/2012 | II |
| Longyou | LY | Longyou/Zhejiang | 119.17/29.03 | 5/2011 | II |
| Wuyi | WY | Wuyi/Zhejiang | 119.85/28.96 | 5/2012 | II |
| Qianshan | QS | Qianshan/Anhui | 116.57/30.64 | 5/2011 | II |
| Yangzhou | YZ | Yangzhou/Jiangsu | 119.26/32.23 | 5/2011 | II |
| Wuhan | WH | Wuhan/Hubei | 114.31/30.55 | 5/2012 | II |
| Xiangfan | XF | Xiangfan/Hubei | 112.13/32.02 | 5/2012 | II |
| Enshi | ES | Enshi/Hubei | 109.42/29.89 | 5/2012 | II |
| Xinyang | XY | Xinyang/Henan | 114.08/32.12 | 6/2012 | II |
| Wuyishan | WYS | Wuyishan/Fujian | 117.09/27.07 | 6/2012 | II |
| Jiujiang | JJ | Jiujiang/Jiangxi | 115.99/29.55 | 6/2012 | II |
| Changsha | CS | Changsha/Hunan | 113.26/28.27 | 5/2011 | II |
Comparison of the COI gene evolution of two E. obliqua clades.
| n | h | S | Pi | D | Tajima's D | Fu and Li's D | Fu and Li's F | |
| Clade I | 53 | 17 | 21 | 0.00453 | −2.068547 | −2.16308 | −3.22719 | −3.38123 |
| Clade II | 118 | 33 | 36 | 0.00332 | −2.714675 | −2.71467 | −5.25702 | −5.21491 |
The letters n, h, S, Pi and D are the no. of E. obliqua samples, no. of mitochondrial DNA haplotype, no. of segregating sites, nucleotide diversity and genetic divergence respectively.
*: P<0.05;
**: P<0.02;
***: P<0.01.
The average pairwise genetic distance of the populations of E. obliqua based on the Kimura 2-parameter model.
| Population code | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | |
| 1 | HZ | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | YH | 0.001 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | LX | 0.003 | 0.002 | |||||||||||||||||
| 4 | YX | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.003 | ||||||||||||||||
| 5 | XF | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | |||||||||||||||
| 6 | CS | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | ||||||||||||||
| 7 | YZ | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | |||||||||||||
| 8 | ES | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||||||||
| 9 | QZ | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||||||||
| 10 | JJ | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||||||
| 11 | WH | 0.043 | 0.043 | 0.043 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.002 | |||||||||
| 12 | SY | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||||
| 13 | WYS | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | |||||||
| 14 | QS | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | ||||||
| 15 | XY | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| 16 | WY | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.043 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | ||||
| 17 | LY | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.042 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| 18 | Ss | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.109 | 0.108 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.108 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | 0.107 | ||
| 19 | Bs | 0.116 | 0.116 | 0.115 | 0.117 | 0.122 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.124 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.123 | 0.129 | |
Bs (S. subpunctaria) and Ss (B. suppressaria) are the outgroups.
Figure 2The NJ tree (L) and MP tree (R) of E. obliqua and two outgroup species based on COI sequence haplotypes.
Numbers above the nodes indicate bootstrap support. The outgroups used were B. suppressaria and S. subpunctaria. The QZ1 haplotype was shared by all thirteen populations insensitive to the EoNPV virus within Clade II; the HZ2 haplotype was shared by all four populations susceptible to the virus within Clade I; and other haplotypes were unique.
The cross-breeding for the YH and SY populations of E. obliqua.
| Cross | Replications | No. eggs laid/female | Hatchability | Survival to adult | Percentage of normal adults | Sex ratio (♀:♂) |
| YH♀×SY♂ | 12 | 357±15.58 B | 0.01±0.00 C | 0.17±0.02 B | 18.23±12.25 B | 1∶4 |
| SY♀×YH♂ | 12 | 394±19.35 AB | 0.54±0.05 B | 0.19±0.01 B | 24.70±10.06 B | 1∶27 |
| YH♀×YH♂ | 12 | 396±8.90 AB | 0.74±0.09 A | 0.80±0.03 A | 93.49±2.05 A | 1∶1 |
| SY♀×SY♂ | 12 | 442±13.80 A | 0.66±0.02 A | 0.77±0.02 A | 94.16±0.62 A | 1∶1 |
Data in the table are mean ± SE. The letters following the SEs group observations in the same column that are not significantly different (P>0.01, Duncan's multiple range test. Means with no common letters were significantly different. Note that the values of the sex ratio (♀:♂) were not analysed in this manner.
The self-crosses of F1 generation from cross-breeding of the YH and SY populations.
| Treatment | Replications | No. eggs laid/female | Hatchability |
| F1(YS)♀×F1(YS)♂ | 0 | — | — |
| F1(SY′)♀×F1(SY′)♂ | 1 | 315 | — |
| F1(YH)♀×F1(YH)♂ | 8 | 465±16.62 | 0.82±0.03 |
| F1(SY)♀×F1(SY)♂ | 8 | 453±37.99 | 0.72±0.10 |
Data shown in the table are mean ± SE. There were no significant differences at the 0.01 level between mean values within columns. The YS is the F1 generation from cross-breeding of YH♀×SY♂, and the SY′ is the F1 generation from cross-breeding of SY♀×YH♂. “—” means none, that is the YS couldn't emerge within three days and therefore produced no eggs with no hatching, and the SY′ produced extremely few eggs with no hatching.
The cross-breeding of the YX and LX populations within Clade I.
| Treatment | Replications | No. eggs laid/female | Hatchability | Adult emergence rate | Sex ratio (♀:♂) |
| YX♀×LX♂ | 8 | 146±18.25 | 0.72±0.08 | 0.62±0.05 | 1: 1.33 |
| LX♀×YX♂ | 8 | 172±22.65 | 0.68±0.14 | 0.56±0.01 | 1∶1.38 |
| YX♀×YX♂ | 8 | 235±34.47 | 0.82±0.01 | 0.51±0.02 | 1∶1.57 |
| LX♀×LX♂ | 8 | 235±54.20 | 0.74±0.08 | 0.52±0.05 | 1∶1.09 |
Data shown in the table are mean ± SE. There were no significant differences at the 0.01 level between mean values within columns. The values of sex ratio (♀:♂) were not included in this analysis.
The cross-breeding of the WH and QS populations within Clade II.
| Treatment | Replications | No. eggs laid/female | Hatchability | Adult emergence rate | Sex ratio (♀:♂) |
| WH♀×QS♂ | 8 | 115±25.47 | 0.54±0.04 | 0.95±0.04 | 1∶1.47 |
| QS♀×WH♂ | 8 | 109±26.47 | 0.60±0.06 | 0.89±0.07 | 1∶1.54 |
| WH♀×WH♂ | 8 | 121±17.98 | 0.65±0.01 | 0.89±0.02 | 1∶1.05 |
| QS♀×QS♂ | 8 | 139±17.31 | 0.63±0.09 | 0.85±0.15 | 1∶1.42 |
Data shown in the table were mean ± SE. There were no significant differences at the 0.01 level between mean values within columns. The values of sex ratio (♀:♂) were not included in this analysis.