| Literature DB >> 24914901 |
Xin-Fu Zhang1, Shao-Lan Yang2, Ying-Ying Han3, Lei Zhao4, Gui-Long Lu5, Tao Xia6, Li-Ping Gao7.
Abstract
A method using LC-ESI-IT-TOF/MS and LC/UV-ELSD was established to qualitatively analyze triterpene saponins obtained from the tea seed pomace (Camellia oleifera Abel). In addition, the quantitative analysis of oleiferasaponin A1 using LC/UV was developed. The purified total saponins did not exhibit any inhibitory effects at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/mL against the tested bacteria, except for Staphyloccocus aureus and Escherichia coli. By contrast, higher inhibitory activity was seen against the tested fungi, especially against Bipolaris maydis. Following treatment with an MIC value of 250 μg/mL for 24 h, the mycelial morphology was markedly shriveled in appearance or showed flattened and empty hyphae, with fractured cell walls, ruptured plasmalemma and cytoplasmic coagulation or leakage. These structural changes hindered the growth of mycelia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24914901 PMCID: PMC6271494 DOI: 10.3390/molecules19067568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1TLC and HPLC/UV analysis of saponins ((A) Crude saponins and (B) Purified saponins).
Estimated molecular weights for saponins in tea seed pomace.
| Peak | Retention Time (min) | [M−H]− | MS2 | Peak | Retention Time (min) | [M−H]− | MS2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.481 | 1219.6161 | 1081, 949 | 21.265 | 1287.6088 | 1119 | ||
| 8.987 | 1263.6080 | - | 25.252 | 1303.6437 | - | ||
| 9.303 | 1291.6013 | 1071, 891 | 28.290 | 1335.6119 | 1137 | ||
| 9.810 | 1201.5639 | 1021, 889 | 29.429 | 1379.6349 | 1199 | ||
| 10.633 | 1203.5867 | - | 30.505 | 1349.6264 | 1169, 1037 | ||
| 11.202 | 1233.5984 | 1053 | 31.138 | 1377.6161 | 1019 | ||
| 11.772 | 1203.5851 | 903 | 32.341 | 1347.6083 | 1135, 1003 | ||
| 12.911 | 1201.5714 | 1073 | 33.353 | 1377.6205 | 1181, 1001 | ||
| 13.544 | 1223.5588 | 1043 | 34.935 | 1349.8273 | 989 | ||
| 14.240 | 1217.6029 | 1095, 963, 783 | 39.556 | 476.2768 | 350 | ||
| 15.063 | 1187.5958 | 1035 | 40.128 | 578.3482 | 506 | ||
| 16.139 | 1039.5210 | 1007 | 41.264 | 352.9290 | 310 | ||
| 16.898 | 1245.6371 | 920 | 43.543 | 554.3477 | 255 | ||
| 17.531 | 1215.5797 | 1035, 903 | 45.372 | 595.2912 | 480 | ||
| 18.670 | 1317.6192 | 1111 | 46.434 | 580.3632 | 263 | ||
| 19.746 | 1287.6083 | 1085, 905 | 51.171 | 571.2912 | 470 | ||
| 20.506 | 1231.6183 | 1005 |
Key: “-” not detected.
Figure 2Typical chromatograms of saponins in tea seed pomace (C. oleifera). (A) Chromatogram at UV 280 nm (LC/UV); (B) Chromatogram at ELSD (LC/ELSD); (C) Total ion chromatogram (LC/TOF-MS).
Figure 3The genin structures of triterpene saponins.
Figure 4The standard curve for HPLC/UV analysis of oleiferasaponin A1 (280 nm).
Anti-bacterial activity of different concentrations of saponins from tea seed pomace on nutrient agar plates incubated at 37 °C for 24 h (inhibitory zone diameter: mm).
| Bacteria | Concentration of Purified Total Saponins (mg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 1 | 10 | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | |
| - | 10.0 ± 1.5 b | 13.1 ± 1.6 a | |
| - | - | 12.2 ± 1.8 | |
Means (n = 3) ± SD followed by different letters (a, b and c) indicated significantly different scores in the same bacteria, according to Duncan’s multiple range tests at p = 0.05 level. Key: “-” not detected.
Anti-fungal activity of different concentrations of saponins from tea seed pomace on potato dextrose agar plates incubated at 27 °C for 72 h (inhibitory zone diameter: mm).
| Fungi | Concentration of Purified Total Saponins (mg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | 1 | 10 | |
| 20.1 ± 1.50 c | 59.3 ± 2.31 b | 67.1 ± 2.55 a | |
| 14.1 ± 1.19 c | 28.8 ± 1.79 b | 61.8 ± 4.86 a | |
| - | 6.1 ± 0.35 b | 39.1 ± 1.95 a | |
| - | 5.8 ± 1.05 b | 23.8 ± 1.78 a | |
| - | 3.7 ± 0.96 b | 14.1± 1.73 a | |
| - | - | 8.0 ± 1.50 | |
Means (n = 3) ± SD followed by different letters (a, b and c) indicate significantly different scores in the same fungi, according to Duncan’s multiple range tests at p = 0.05 level. Key: “-” not detected.
Figure 5The morphological alteration of B. maydis mycelium treated by total saponin at a concentration of 250 μg/mL for 24 h observed with optical microscope. (A) Healthy mycelium; (B) treated mycelium.
Figure 6Transmission electron microscopy of mycelial ultrastructure of B. maydis treated by total saponin at a concentration of 250 μg/mL for 24 h. (A) Healthy mycelium; (B) treated mycelium; A ×7,000 and B ×10,000 magnification.