Literature DB >> 24914381

Conventional endoscopic features are not sufficient to differentiate small, early colorectal cancer.

Wan Park1, Bun Kim1, Soo Jung Park1, Jae Hee Cheon1, Tae Il Kim1, Won Ho Kim1, Sung Pil Hong1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the depth of invasion of small, early colorectal cancers (ECCs) using conventional endoscopic features.
METHODS: From January 2005 to September 2011, colonoscopy cohort showed that a total of 72 patients with small colorectal cancers with the size less than 20 mm underwent colonoscopy at the Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. Among them, 8 patients were excluded due to incomplete medical records. Finally, a total of 64 ECCs with submucosa (SM) invasion and size less than 20 mm were included. One hundred fifty-two adenomas with size less than 20 mm were included as controls. Nine endoscopic features, including seven morphological findings (i.e., loss of lobulation, excavation, demarcated and depressed areas, stalk swelling, fullness, fold convergence, and bleeding ulcers), pit patterns, and non-lifting signs, were evaluated retrospectively. All endoscopic features were evaluated by two experienced endoscopists who have each performed over 1000 colonoscopies annually for more than five years without knowledge of the histology.
RESULTS: Among the morphological findings, the size of deep submucosal cancers was bigger than that of superficial lesions (16.9 mm vs 12.3 mm, P < 0.001). Also, demarcated depressed areas, stalk swelling, and fullness were more common in deep SM cancers than in superficial tumors (demarcated depressed areas: 52.0% vs 15.7%, P < 0.001; stalk swelling: 100% vs 4.2%, P < 0.001; fullness: 25.0% vs 0%, P = 0.001). Among deep SM cancers, 96% of polyps showed invasive pit patterns, whereas 19.4% of superficial tumors showed invasive pit patterns (P < 0.001). A positive non-lifting sign was more common in deep SM cancers (85.0% vs 28.6%, P < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of invasive morphology, invasive pit patterns, and non-lifting signs for deep SM cancers were 71%, 82%, and 75%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Conventional endoscopic findings were insufficient to discriminate small, deep SM cancers from superficial SM cancers by white light, standard colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal neoplasms; Differential diagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24914381      PMCID: PMC4047345          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  21 in total

1.  Diagnosis of depth of invasion for early colorectal cancer using magnifying colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hisatomo Ikehara; Yutaka Saito; Takahisa Matsuda; Toshio Uraoka; Yoshitaka Murakami
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 2.  High-magnification colonoscopy (with videos).

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Tonya Kaltenbach; Kazuaki Chayama; Roy Soetikno
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa.

Authors:  Shin ei Kudo; René Lambert; John I Allen; Hiroaki Fujii; Takahiro Fujii; Hiroshi Kashida; Takahisa Matsuda; Masaki Mori; Hiroshi Saito; Tadakazu Shimoda; Shinji Tanaka; Hidenobu Watanabe; Joseph J Sung; Andrew D Feld; John M Inadomi; Michael J O'Brien; David A Lieberman; David F Ransohoff; Roy M Soetikno; George Triadafilopoulos; Ann Zauber; Claudio Rolim Teixeira; Jean François Rey; Edgar Jaramillo; Carlos A Rubio; Andre Van Gossum; Michael Jung; Michael Vieth; Jeremy R Jass; Paul D Hurlstone
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for early colorectal neoplasia: pathologic basis, procedures, and outcomes.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Rinaldo Pellicano; Giuseppe Strangio; Silvio Danese; Sharmila Fagoonee; Alberto Malesci
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Colorectal cancer cells activate adjacent fibroblasts resulting in FGF1/FGFR3 signaling and increased invasion.

Authors:  Maria L Henriksson; Sofia Edin; Anna M Dahlin; Per-Arne Oldenborg; Åke Öberg; Bethany Van Guelpen; Jörgen Rutegård; Roger Stenling; Richard Palmqvist
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Efficacy, safety and outcomes of 'inject and cut' endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Francesco Ferrara; Carmelo Luigiano; Stefania Ghersi; Carlo Fabbri; Marco Bassi; Patrizia Landi; Anna Maria Polifemo; Paola Billi; Vincenzo Cennamo; Pierluigi Consolo; Angela Alibrandi; Nicola D'Imperio
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuda; Takahiro Fujii; Yutaka Saito; Takeshi Nakajima; Toshio Uraoka; Nozomu Kobayashi; Hisatomo Ikehara; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kuang-I Fu; Fabian Emura; Akiko Ono; Yasushi Sano; Tadakazu Shimoda; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancers: from East to West.

Authors:  Shin-ei Kudo; Orie Takemura; Kazuo Ohtsuka
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2008-07

9.  Determining the treatment strategy for colorectal neoplastic lesions: endoscopic assessment or the non-lifting sign for diagnosing invasion depth?

Authors:  N Kobayashi; Y Saito; Y Sano; N Uragami; T Michita; J Nasu; T Matsuda; K I Fu; T Fujii; T Fujimori; T Ishikawa; D Saito
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Size does not determine the grade of malignancy of early invasive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito; Takahiro Fujii; Toshio Uraoka; Takeshi Nakajima; Nozomu Kobayashi; Fabian Emura; Akiko Ono; Tadakazu Shimoda; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Kuang I Fu; Yasushi Sano; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  5 in total

1.  Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for evaluating the submucosal invasion of colorectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Bun Kim; Yon Hee Kim; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Hoguen Kim; Sung Pil Hong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Narrow Band Imaging, Magnifying Chromoendoscopy, and Gross Morphological Features for the Optical Diagnosis of T1 Colorectal Cancer and Deep Submucosal Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Y Backes; A Moss; J B Reitsma; P D Siersema; L M G Moons
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Endoscopic features of submucosal deeply invasive colorectal cancer with NBI characteristics : S Saito et al. Endoscopic images of early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shoichi Saito; Hisao Tajiri; Masahiro Ikegami
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-11

4.  Does a Pre-Training Program Influence Colonoscopy Proficiency during Fellowship?

Authors:  Duk Hwan Kim; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Sung Pil Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Signet ring cell carcinoma hidden beneath large pedunculated colorectal polyp: A case report.

Authors:  Jia-Ning Yan; Yong-Fu Shao; Guo-Liang Ye; Yong Ding
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.