Literature DB >> 20546444

Diagnosis of depth of invasion for early colorectal cancer using magnifying colonoscopy.

Hisatomo Ikehara1, Yutaka Saito, Takahisa Matsuda, Toshio Uraoka, Yoshitaka Murakami.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Early colorectal cancer (CRC) with submucosal deep (s.m.-d.) invasion should not be treated with endoscopic mucosal resection due to the higher incidence of lymph-node metastasis. It is, therefore, clinically important to accurately diagnose s.m.-d. lesions before treatment.
METHODS: We analyzed the endoscopic features, including pit patterns, of early CRC with s.m.-d. invasion observed using magnifying colonoscopy. We retrospectively investigated 379 cases of early CRC. Lesions were divided into three macroscopic subtypes (pedunculated type, sessile type and superficial type) based on endoscopic findings. Eight endoscopic factors were evaluated retrospectively for association with s.m. invasion and then compared to histopathological findings.
RESULTS: The superficial type had a significantly higher frequency of s.m.-d. invasion (52.4% [77/147] vs 24.6% [14/57] and 39.4% [69/175], P-value < 0.05, respectively, for pedunculated and sessile types). Based on multivariate analysis, an independent risk factor for s.m.-d. invasion was the existence of an invasive pit pattern in sessile and superficial types (odds ratios of 52.74 and 209.67, respectively). Fullness was also an independent risk factor for s.m.-d. invasion in the superficial type (odds ratio = 9.25). There were no independent risk factors for s.m.-d. invasion in the pedunculated type.
CONCLUSION: High magnification pit pattern diagnosis proved to be useful for predicting s.m.-d. invasion in sessile and superficial types although it was not as helpful with the pedunculated type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20546444     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  24 in total

Review 1.  Advanced endoscopic imaging in Barrett's oesophagus: a review on current practice.

Authors:  Rajvinder Singh; SweeLin Chen Yi Mei; Sandeep Sethi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Pilot study on probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for colorectal neoplasms: an initial experience in Japan.

Authors:  Seiichiro Abe; Yutaka Saito; Yasuhiro Oono; Yusaku Tanaka; Taku Sakamoto; Masayoshi Yamada; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Tomonori Yano; Shigeki Sekine; Motohiro Kojima; Hidetsugu Yamagishi; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan.

Authors:  Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yutaka Saito; Hiroyasu Iishi; Shin-ei Kudo; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Masahiro Igarashi; Yusuke Saitoh; Yuji Inoue; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Takashi Hisabe; Osamu Tsuruta; Yasushi Sano; Hiroo Yamano; Seiji Shimizu; Naohisa Yahagi; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hisashi Nakamura; Takahiro Fujii; Hideki Ishikawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for elderly patients at least 80 years of age.

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Reiji Higashi; Jun Kato; Eisuke Kaji; Hideyuki Suzuki; Shin Ishikawa; Mitsuhiro Akita; Tomoko Hirakawa; Shunsuke Saito; Keisuke Hori; Yoshiro Kawahara; Robert J Mead; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  The impact of transanal local excision of early rectal cancer on completion rectal resection without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Zinicola; R Nascimbeni; R Cirocchi; G Gagliardi; N Cracco; M Giuffrida; G Pedrazzi; G A Binda
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Narrow Band Imaging, Magnifying Chromoendoscopy, and Gross Morphological Features for the Optical Diagnosis of T1 Colorectal Cancer and Deep Submucosal Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Y Backes; A Moss; J B Reitsma; P D Siersema; L M G Moons
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Clinical outcomes of deep invasive submucosal colorectal cancer after ESD.

Authors:  Daisuke Watanabe; Takashi Toyonaga; Makoto Ooi; Tetsuya Yoshizaki; Yoshiko Ohara; Shinwa Tanaka; Fumiaki Kawara; Tsukasa Ishida; Yoshinori Morita; Eiji Umegaki; Takeru Matsuda; Yasuo Sumi; Mari Nishio; Hiroshi Yokozaki; Takeshi Azuma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Endoluminal ultrasound biomicroscopy as a reliable tool for in vivo assessment of colonic inflammation in rats.

Authors:  Marcelo Alexandre Pinto de Britto; Rossana Colla Soletti; Alberto Schanaider; Kalil Madi; Heitor Siffert Pereira de Souza; João Carlos Machado
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Conventional endoscopic features are not sufficient to differentiate small, early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wan Park; Bun Kim; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Sung Pil Hong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Does magnifying narrow-band imaging or magnifying chromoendoscopy help experienced endoscopists assess invasion depth of large sessile and flat polyps?

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Sung Pil Hong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.