Literature DB >> 24913717

STING ligand c-di-GMP improves cancer vaccination against metastatic breast cancer.

Dinesh Chandra1, Wilber Quispe-Tintaya1, Arthee Jahangir1, Denise Asafu-Adjei1, Ilyssa Ramos1, Herman O Sintim2, Jie Zhou2, Yoshihiro Hayakawa3, David K R Karaolis4, Claudia Gravekamp5.   

Abstract

Cancer vaccination may be our best and most benign option for preventing or treating metastatic cancer. However, breakthroughs are hampered by immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment. In this study, we analyzed whether cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP), a ligand for stimulator of interferon genes (STING), could overcome immune suppression and improve vaccination against metastatic breast cancer. Mice with metastatic breast cancer (4T1 model) were therapeutically immunized with an attenuated Listeria monocytogenes (LM)-based vaccine, expressing tumor-associated antigen Mage-b (LM-Mb), followed by multiple low doses of c-di-GMP (0.2 μmol/L). This treatment resulted in a striking and near elimination of all metastases. Experiments revealed that c-di-GMP targets myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and tumor cells. Low doses of c-di-GMP significantly increased the production of IL12 by MDSCs, in correlation with improved T-cell responses to Mage-b, whereas a high dose of c-di-GMP (range, 0.3-3 mmol/L) activated caspase-3 in the 4T1 tumor cells and killed the tumor cells directly. On the basis of these results, we tested one administration of high-dose c-di-GMP (3 mmol/L) followed by repeated administrations of low-dose c-di-GMP (0.2 μmol/L) in the 4T1 model, and found equal efficacy compared with the combination of LM-Mb and c-di-GMP. This finding correlated with a mechanism of improved CD8 T-cell responses to tumor-associated antigens (TAA) Mage-b and Survivin, most likely through cross-presentation of these TAAs from c-di-GMP-killed 4T1 tumor cells, and through c-di-GMP-activated TAA-specific T cells. Our results demonstrate that activation of STING-dependent pathways by c-di-GMP is highly attractive for cancer immunotherapy. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24913717      PMCID: PMC4264585          DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res        ISSN: 2326-6066            Impact factor:   11.151


  34 in total

Review 1.  Innate immune DNA sensing pathways: STING, AIMII and the regulation of interferon production and inflammatory responses.

Authors:  Glen N Barber
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 2.  The potential of 3',5'-cyclic diguanylic acid (c-di-GMP) as an effective vaccine adjuvant.

Authors:  Wangxue Chen; Rhonda Kuolee; Hongbin Yan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Tregs and rethinking cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Tyler J Curiel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: linking inflammation and cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg; Pratima Sinha
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Cyclic di-GMP stimulates protective innate immunity in bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  David K R Karaolis; Michael W Newstead; Xianying Zeng; Mamoru Hyodo; Yoshihiro Hayakawa; Urvhashi Bhan; Hallie Liang; Theodore J Standiford
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  High efficacy of a Listeria-based vaccine against metastatic breast cancer reveals a dual mode of action.

Authors:  Sun Hee Kim; Francisco Castro; Yvonne Paterson; Claudia Gravekamp
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system.

Authors:  Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Srinivas Nagaraj
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.106

8.  Host type I IFN signals are required for antitumor CD8+ T cell responses through CD8{alpha}+ dendritic cells.

Authors:  Mercedes B Fuertes; Aalok K Kacha; Justin Kline; Seng-Ryong Woo; David M Kranz; Kenneth M Murphy; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling.

Authors:  Hiroki Ishikawa; Glen N Barber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Vaccination with Mage-b DNA induces CD8 T-cell responses at young but not old age in mice with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  F Castro; B Leal; A Denny; R Bahar; S Lampkin; R Reddick; S Lu; C Gravekamp
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  83 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Pathways: Targeting the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) in the Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Authors:  Leticia Corrales; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  STING agonist formulated cancer vaccines can cure established tumors resistant to PD-1 blockade.

Authors:  Juan Fu; David B Kanne; Meredith Leong; Laura Hix Glickman; Sarah M McWhirter; Edward Lemmens; Ken Mechette; Justin J Leong; Peter Lauer; Weiqun Liu; Kelsey E Sivick; Qi Zeng; Kevin C Soares; Lei Zheng; Daniel A Portnoy; Joshua J Woodward; Drew M Pardoll; Thomas W Dubensky; Young Kim
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Nanoparticulate STING agonists are potent lymph node-targeted vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  Melissa C Hanson; Monica P Crespo; Wuhbet Abraham; Kelly D Moynihan; Gregory L Szeto; Stephanie H Chen; Mariane B Melo; Stefanie Mueller; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  The cGAS/STING Pathway Is Important for Dendritic Cell Activation but Is Not Essential to Induce Protective Immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection.

Authors:  Fabio V Marinho; Sulayman Benmerzoug; Stephanie Rose; Priscila C Campos; João T Marques; André Báfica; Glen Barber; Bernhard Ryffel; Sergio C Oliveira; Valerie F J Quesniaux
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 7.349

5.  Protective role of STING against gliomagenesis: Rational use of STING agonist in anti-glioma immunotherapy.

Authors:  Takayuki Ohkuri; Arundhati Ghosh; Akemi Kosaka; Saumendra N Sarkar; Hideho Okada
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 6.  The Multifaceted Role of Chromosomal Instability in Cancer and Its Microenvironment.

Authors:  Samuel F Bakhoum; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Enhancing immunotherapy of STING agonist for lymphoma in preclinical models.

Authors:  Adrienne Sallets; Sophie Robinson; Adel Kardosh; Ronald Levy
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-09-11

8.  Sublingual targeting of STING with 3'3'-cGAMP promotes systemic and mucosal immunity against anthrax toxins.

Authors:  Tara L Martin; Junbae Jee; Eunsoo Kim; Haley E Steiner; Estelle Cormet-Boyaka; Prosper N Boyaka
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Established T Cell-Inflamed Tumors Rejected after Adaptive Resistance Was Reversed by Combination STING Activation and PD-1 Pathway Blockade.

Authors:  Ellen Moore; Paul E Clavijo; Ruth Davis; Harrison Cash; Carter Van Waes; Young Kim; Clint Allen
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 11.151

Review 10.  Interrupting cyclic dinucleotide-cGAS-STING axis with small molecules.

Authors:  Herman O Sintim; Clinton G Mikek; Modi Wang; Moloud A Sooreshjani
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.597

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.