| Literature DB >> 24913135 |
Ewa E Hennig1, Michal Mikula, Krzysztof Goryca, Agnieszka Paziewska, Joanna Ledwon, Monika Nesteruk, Marek Woszczynski, Bozena Walewska-Zielecka, Kazimiera Pysniak, Jerzy Ostrowski.
Abstract
One of the main questions regarding nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is the molecular background of the transition from simple steatosis (SS) to the inflammatory and fibrogenic condition of steatohepatitis (NASH). We examined the gene expression changes during progression from histologically normal liver to SS and NASH in models of obesity caused by hyperphagia or a high-fat diet. Microarray-based analysis revealed that the expression of 1445 and 264 probe sets was changed exclusively in SS and NASH samples, respectively, and 1577 probe sets were commonly altered in SS and NASH samples. Functional annotations indicated that transcriptome alterations that were common for NASH and SS, as well as exclusive for NASH, involved extracellular matrix (ECM)-related processes, although they differed in the type of matrix structure change. The expression of 80 genes was significantly changed in all three comparisons: SS versus control, NASH versus control and NASH versus SS. Of these genes, epithelial membrane protein 1, IKBKB interacting protein and decorin were progressively up-regulated in both SS and NASH compared to normal tissue. The molecular context of interactions of encoded 80 proteins revealed that they are highly interconnected and significantly enriched for processes involving metabolism by cytochrome P450. Validation of 10 selected mRNAs encoding genes related to ECM and cytochrome P450 with quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed consistent changes in their expression during NASH development. The expression profile of these genes has the potential to distinguish NASH from SS and normal tissue and may possibly be beneficial in the clinical diagnosis of NASH.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; NASH; cytochrome P450; extracellular matrix; liver; mouse model; obesity; steatohepatitis; steatosis; transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24913135 PMCID: PMC4196652 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Serum biochemical parameters at 16-week and 48-week time-points
| Fasted | Non-fasted | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ob/ob | db/db | HFD | Control | ob/ob | db/db | HFD | Control | |
| 16-weeks | ||||||||
| GLU (mmol/l) median (range) | 10.4 | 8.0 (2.5–9) | 6.7 | 3.0 (2–5.8) | 6.6 (4–11.4) | 6.6 (5.9–7.4) | 9.4 | 6.8 (5.8–9.4) |
| INS (ng/ml) median (range) | 3.61 | 4.66 | 0.86 | 0.08 (0.04–0.18) | 8.30 | 7.91 | 4.17 | 0.83 (0.5–1.35) |
| AST (U/l) median (range) | 756 | 776 | 142 (109–185) | 158 (129–245) | 645 | 384 | 90 (64–199) | 120 (66–195) |
| ALT (U/l) median (range) | 672 | 734 | 46 | 32 (21–40) | 598 | 354 | 39 (36–68) | 29 (25–67) |
| ALKP (U/l) median (range) | 483 | 398 | 75 (61–84) | 88 (28–99) | 532 | 350 | 71 | 96 (87–114) |
| CHOL (mmol/l) median (range) | 5.63 | 5.28 | 3.48 (2.84–3.53) | 2.83 (2.47–3.7) | 5.90 | 5.11 | 3.74 | 3.12 (2.49–3.52) |
| TRIG (mmol/l) median (range) | 1.13 | 0.98 (0.79–1.27) | 1.15 | 1.00 (0.86–1.21) | 1.05 (0.88–1.24) | 0.80 | 1.13 (0.92–1.33) | 1.04 (0.97–1.45) |
| 48-weeks | ||||||||
| GLU (mmol/l) median (range) | 10.9 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 3.1 (2.1–4.6) | 6.1 (5.4–6.6) | 6.7 (5.4–12.1) | 7.8 (6.8–9.7) | 7.3 (5.8–10.5) |
| INS (ng/ml) median (range) | 4.74 | 6.56 | 2.80 | 0.16 (0.04–0.21) | 20.87 | 10.26 | 32.36 | 1.83 (0.21–5.81) |
| AST (U/l) median (range) | 672 | 577 | 467 | 190 (117–273) | 349 | 333 | 313 | 137 (110–258) |
| ALT (U/l) median (range) | 570 | 422 | 352 | 28 (16–62) | 229 | 251 | 245 | 28 (17–148) |
| ALKP (U/l) median (range) | 344 | 254 | 181 | 103 (82–123) | 280 | 214 | 122 (111–208) | 103 (55–137) |
| CHOL (mmol/l) median (range) | 4.97 | 5.36 | 5.22 | 3.00 (2.26–3.35) | 6.06 | 5.80 | 5.47 | 3.68 (2.57–4.15) |
| TRIG (mmol/l) median (range) | 1.30 | 1.07 | 1.19 | 0.69 (0.55–0.9) | 0.98 (0.8–1.14) | 0.85 (0.44–1.51) | 0.92 (0.79–1.1) | 0.74 (0.54–0.95) |
P < 0.05, compared with the relevant control group. HFD; high-fat diet fed mice.
Fig. 1Venn diagram representing the common and unique differentially expressed probe sets in the simple steatosis (SS) and steatohepatitis (NASH) tissues. Combined comparison of the differentially expressed probe sets in fasted and non-fasted mice; a set of 1445 probes represented the genes altered exclusively in SS, a set of 264 probes represented the genes altered exclusively in NASH, and a set of 1577 probes represented the genes commonly changed in both SS and NASH.
Fig. 2STRING interaction networks for a set of 80 proteins. The expression of genes encoded these proteins was significantly changed both in the simple steatosis and steatohepatitis tissues, as compared to normal liver tissue, and between these two types of tissues. The thicker network edges represent stronger evidence of association. The node colour depicts the significantly enriched KEGG category assigned to the set of 80 proteins by using the STRING database, while white nodes indicate proteins with other functions or without functional annotations.
Fig. 3qRT-PCR analysis of 10 selected genes in 90 individual liver samples representing normal tissue (control; n = 36), simple steatosis (SS; n = 21) and steatohepatitis (NASH; n = 33). One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed to generate cDNA, and q-PCR was performed with SYBR Green I chemistry. The box border represents the interquartile range and the horizontal line in the box represents the median. The whiskers denote the largest/smallest observation. The statistical significance of the differences was assessed by using a t-test and was corrected for multiple hypotheses testing by using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. (*) Adjusted P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered as significant. ns, not significant.
Fig. 4Principal component analysis decomposition of the qRT-PCR data sets for liver samples representing normal tissue (control), simple steatosis (SS) and steatohepatitis (NASH).