| Literature DB >> 24913069 |
Zhen-Ling Zeng, Hong-Kun Wei, Jing Wang, Da-Chuan Lin, Xiao-Qin Liu, Jian-Hua Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence and wide distribution of the transferable gene for linezolid resistance, cfr, in staphylococci of human and animal origins is of great concern as it poses a serious threat to the public health. In the present study, we investigated the emergence and presence of the multiresistance gene, cfr, in retail meat sourced from supermarkets and free markets of Guangzhou, China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24913069 PMCID: PMC4059476 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Characteristics of -carrying isolates and transformants
| TDP5 | Pork | 1 | C | P | 16 | >64 | >64 | 128 | 64 | 2 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TDPJC2 | Chicken | 1 | P | ND | 32 | 32 | >64 | 64 | 0.5 | 2 | OXA, CIP, ERY | |
| TYT5 | Pork | 3 | F | P | 32 | 32 | 64 | 128 | 64 | 2 | TET | |
| TYT7 | Pork | 3 | F | P | 16 | >64 | >64 | 64 | 16 | 2 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY | |
| TDP9 | Pork | 1 | D | P | 32 | >64 | >64 | >128 | >64 | 8 | OXA, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TDPJC9 | Chicken | 1 | J | P | 16 | 64 | >64 | 128 | 2 | 4 | OXA, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TLD18 | Pork | 2 | L1 | P | 16 | >64 | >64 | >128 | 64 | 8 | OXA, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TLDJC5 | Chicken | 2 | L2 | P | 64 | 32 | >64 | >128 | 16 | 4 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, RIF, TET | |
| TLDJC9 | Chicken | 2 | N | P | 32 | 64 | >64 | >128 | 2 | 4 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, RIF, TET | |
| TLH5 | Pork | 4 | L3 | ND | 16 | >64 | >64 | 128 | 8 | 4 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TYTJC3 | Chicken | 3 | I | ND | 16 | 32 | >64 | >128 | 4 | 4 | ERY, TET | |
| TYTJC8 | Chicken | 3 | I | ND | 16 | 32 | 64 | 64 | 16 | 2 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY | |
| TDPJC13 | Chicken | 1 | E | P | 64 | 64 | >64 | >128 | 32 | 4 | OXA, CIP, GEN, TET | |
| TDPJC5 | Chicken | 1 | R | ND | 32 | >64 | >64 | >128 | >64 | 16 | OXA, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TLKJC2 | Chicken | 6 | Q | P | 16 | >64 | >64 | >128 | 16 | 8 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TDP12 | Pork | 1 | A | ND | >64 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 16 | 4 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, RIF | |
| TDP24 | Pork | 1 | B | ND | 32 | >64 | >64 | 64 | 2 | 4 | TET | |
| THTJC2 | Chicken | 5 | O | P | 64 | 32 | >64 | >128 | 4 | 4 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, RIF | |
| TLD12 | Pork | 2 | K | P | >64 | >64 | >64 | >128 | 64 | 8 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, RIF, TET | |
| TLD20 | Pork | 2 | M | P | >64 | >64 | >64 | 128 | 32 | 4 | OXA, CIP, GEN, ERY, RIF, TET | |
| TLD22 | Pork | 2 | G2 | P | 16 | >64 | >64 | 128 | 8 | 8 | CIP, GEN, ERY, TET | |
| TYT6 | Pork | 3 | G1 | ND | 16 | >64 | >64 | >128 | 64 | 4 | OXA, ERY, TET | |
| Recipient RN4220 | | | | | 4 | 4 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 1 | ND | |
| RN4220-pHNLKJC2 | | | | | 32 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 4 | ND | |
| DH5α | | | | | 4 | 4 | - | - | - | - | ND | |
| DH5 | | | | | 8 | 8 | - | - | - | - | ND | |
| ATCC 29213 | 2 | 2 | 0.12 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 1 | ||||||
aPatterns that differed from pattern A by six or more bands were considered to represent different strains. Patterns that differed by fewer than six bands were considered to represent subtypes within the main group (e.g.,L1, L2).
bP, plasmid; ND, not determined.
cCHL, chloramphenicol; FFC, florfenicol; CLR, clindamycin; TIA, tiamulin; VAL, valnemulin; LZD, linezolid. MIC was not measured because of known intrinsic resistance or naturally high MICs.
dThe results were interpreted according to Eucast breakpoints ( http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/). OXA, oxacillin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GEN, gentamycin; ERY, erythromycin; RIF, rifamycin; TET, tetracycline. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin. ND, not determined.
Figure 1Genetic environment of in plasmids pHNTLD18 and pHNLKJC2 and comparison with other similar plasmids. The arrows indicate the positions and directions of the transcription of the genes. Regions of >98% homology are shaded in grey. Δ indicates a truncated gene. A. genetic environment of cfr in pHNTLD18; B. genetic environment of cfr in pHNLKJC2.