Literature DB >> 24911878

Second-stage vs first-stage caesarean delivery: comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes.

O Asıcıoglu1, K Güngördük, G Yildirim, B Besımoglu Asıcıoglu, O Çelikkol Güngördük, C Ark, T Günay, N Yenigül.   

Abstract

Abstract In this observational study, we investigated the maternal and perinatal complications of caesarean delivery performed in the second stage compared with the first stage of labour at a tertiary hospital in İstanbul. This study was performed from June 2008 to July 2011. Primary maternal outcomes measured included intraoperative surgical complications, surgery duration, need for blood transfusion, endometritis, requirement for hysterectomy, unintended extension and length of hospital stay. Neonatal outcomes included a 5 min Apgar score ≤ 3, admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, fetal injury, septicaemia and neonatal death. In total, 3,817 caesarean deliveries were available for analysis; 3,519 were performed in the first stage, and 298 in the second stage. Caesarean deliveries performed in the second stage were associated with increased intraoperative complications, unintended extensions, need for blood transfusion, higher rates of endometritis and requirement for hysterectomy and were, therefore, associated with longer operation time and hospital stay. Neonatal complications included a significantly low Apgar score at 5 min, increased neonatal death, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, septicaemia and fetal injury (all p < 0.05). Caesarean deliveries performed in the second stage of labour were associated with higher rates of maternal and neonatal complications, particularly in women who had undergone previous caesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean delivery; first and second stage of labour; maternal and neonatal complications

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24911878     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2014.920790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  3 in total

1.  Unintended hysterotomy extension during caesarean delivery: risk factors and maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Lauren E Giugale; Sara Sakamoto; Jonathan Yabes; Shannon L Dunn; Elizabeth E Krans
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Evaluating the impact of a standardized induction protocol to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Katheryne L Downes; Rebecca F Hamm; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2019-10-24

3.  Correlation Between Previous Caesarean Section and Adverse Maternal Outcomes Accordingly With Robson Classification: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shazia Jamshed; Shuo-Chen Chien; Afifa Tanweer; Rahma-Novita Asdary; Muhammad Hardhantyo; David Greenfield; Chia-Hui Chien; Shuen-Fu Weng; Wen-Shan Jian; Usman Iqbal
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.