Literature DB >> 24910748

Prevalence of ETV6/RUNX1 Fusion Gene in Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Iran.

Ahmad-Reza Rahnemoon1, Farhad Zaker1, Mina Izadyar2, Shahla Ansari3, Behzad Poopak4, Yuri Tadavosyan5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: ETV6/RUNX1 (also known as TEL/AML1) is the most frequent gene fusion in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Sixty-three patients were enrolled in this study to explore the distribution of this gene in Iranian population.
METHODS: This study used 63 peripheral blood and bone marrow (PB/BM) samples from children with ALL. Immunophenotyping of PB and BM samples were performed using flow cytometry to illustrate the lineage. Moreover, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique was used to amplify transcripts of leukemia-specific chromosome fusion gene ETV6/RUNX1 and to monitor the expression levels of the ETV6/RUNX1 in patients according to Van Dongen et al protocol.
FINDINGS: On the basis of French-American-British (FAB) classification, 47 individuals had ALL-L1. The incidence of ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene in this study was 34.9%. The laboratory and clinical features of twenty two ETV6/RUNX1 positive ALL cases were similar to those of other studies. The most positive cases of ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene had the early pre B ALL and pre B ALL immunophenotypes.
CONCLUSION: The ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene is a common genetic anomaly in Iranian childhood ALL patients and the prevalence of the ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene is similar to that of ALL patients in other countries. However early pre B cells were the most common type in studied patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; ETV6/RUNX1 Fusion; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Reverse Transcriptase

Year:  2013        PMID: 24910748      PMCID: PMC4025127     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Pediatr        ISSN: 2008-2142            Impact factor:   0.364


Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children. The precise diagnosis and classification of ALL is based on morphology, cytochemistry, immunophenotype, and molecular analyses of bone marrow cells. In pediatric B-lineage ALL, the t(12;21) (p13;q22) chromosomal translocation is very common and usually found in a bout 25% of all cases. The t(12; 21) (p13; q22) was first described in 1994[ and is not detectable by conventional cytogenetic methods. It leads to the fusion of two genes, RUNX1 (AML1) on chromosome 21 and ETV6 (TEL) on chromosome12[. The RUNX1 belongs to the core binding factor family of transcription factors[ and ETV6 is involved in chromosome translocations in a wide variety of hematologic malignancies[. It appears to be an important transcription factor required for hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. Most affected patients are between the ages of 1 and 10 years with WBC count <50000/µL, and a B immunophonotype[. This study recruited newly diagnosed ALL children with transloction of t(12;21) producing the ETV6/RVNX1 fusion gene. The correlation of fused gene with the local incidence of disease and the prognosticc factors was explored and analyzed. Nonetheless, studies on genetic alteration in leukemic cells significantly enhance the accuracy of diagnosis and allow determining treatment strategy for childhood ALL, especially when specific aberration is present. To increase the information available on patients with this abnormality, we examined 63 children with ALL. The present study emphasizes their laboratory data, outcomes and comparisons with other patients from the literature.

Subjects and Methods

The initial diagnosis of ALL was established by morphological, cytochemical and immune phenotypic assessments. The French-American-British (FAB) classification is based on morphology and cytochemical stains[. Immunophenotyping was determined by flow cytometry using a panel of monoclonal antibodies to define the lineage and to determine the level of differentiation[. The default panel established included: CD34, CD 45, HLA-DR, CD117, CD10, CD19, CD4, CD7, CD8, CD38, TdT, CD2, CD3, CD20 and CD22. Molecular analysis: mononuclear cells were isolated from PB/BM samples by Ficoll-Hypaque density centrifugation and the target genes amplified using the specific primers as follows: For the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, total RNA was extracted by a single– step method with Trizol (Invitrogen). To quantify ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene the RT-PCR was performed according to a standardized protocol by Van Dongen and colleagues[. Moreover, all cases were analyzed and reevaluated using positive and negative controls.

Findings

The correlation of the hematological and clinical prognostic factors with the outcome of the disease was analyzed. Among the sixty three patients evaluated, 39 (62%) were boys and 24 (38%) girls and their age at the time of diagnosis varied between 1 year and 13 years. The results of hematological, immunological and molecular analysis are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Hematological, immunological data of ALL patients and RT-PCR fusion gene amplification

PatientAge of diagnosis (yr.mon/sex)Hgb g/dLWBC ×103 mLType of ALLImmunophenotypet(12;21) ETV6/RUNX1 Outcome
17.9/F7.54300L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
22.10/M8.99840L1 Pre B ALL-CR
33.5/M6.7173300L2 T-ALL-CR
42/M729330L1 Early pre BALL-CR
53/F11.88380L1 Pre B ALL-CR
68.5/M10.816560L1 Pre B ALL-CR
74/M10.512170L2 Early pre B ALL-CR
87/M10.410400L1 Pro B ALL-CR
91.5F10.28600L2 Pre B ALL+CR
107/M8.129450L2 Early pre B ALL-CR
113/F4.616000L2 Pre B ALL+Died
123.8/F7.42130L1 T ALL+CR
139/F7.65720L2 Early pre B ALL-CR
141.7/M5.97620L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
1510/M9.82470L1 Early pre B ALL+CR
162.5/M10.813490L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
178/M10.824140L1 T ALL-CR
1812.5/F6.710600L1 Pre B ALL-Died
194/F6.777980L2 Early pre B ALL+CR
203.2/F106320L3 Early pre B ALL+CR
214.10/F5.341280L2 Pre B ALL+CR
224.1/F6.68170L1 Early pre B ALL+CR
239/F811200L1 Pre B ALL-CR
243.10/F4.918400L1 Pro B ALL-CR
253.5/M5.935020L1 Early pre B ALL+CR
268/F6.614000L1 Early pre B ALL associated with aberrant expression CD2-CR
275/M7.19770L1 Pre B ALL+CR
284/M9.122200ALLPre B ALL+CR
294/M6.322640L1 Early pre B ALL along with aberrant expression of CD13 +CR
306.10/F8.970000L1 Pre B ALL+CR
318.2/M9.52680L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
323.7/M8.13600L2 Early pre B ALL-CR
332/M10.41540L3 Early pre B ALL-Died
343.9/M6.626400L3 Early pre B ALL+CR
3511/F11.916600L1 Pre B ALL+CR
3612/M8.3803370L1 T-ALL-Died
377/F9.35700L1 Pre B ALL-CR
383/M6.239700L1 Early pre B ALL+CR
3911/M7.92100L1 Pre B ALL-CR
4013/M4.611970L1 Pro B ALL-CR
411.8/F-5470L1 Pre B ALL-CR
4211/M5.214300L1 Pre B ALL-CR
434.5/M10.15100L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
449/M9.93900ALLPro B ALL+CR
4512/M5.116930L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
462/F7.679600L1 Early pre B ALL+CR
475/M6.420700L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
481.5/M7.910500L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
494.5/F3.212500L2 Pre B ALL-CR
502/M10.511310L1 Pre B ALL+CR
518/F6.227420L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
522/F8.715750L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
537/M8.815560L1 T-ALL-CR
544/M5.31470L1 Pre B ALL-CR
552/M112530L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
561/F13.17150L1 Pre B ALL+CR
5712/F4.214210ALLEarly pre B ALL+CR
582/M7.95790L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
596/M10.8113180L1 T-ALL-CR
603/M7.911150L1 Early pre B ALL-CR
615/M5.619710L1 Pre B ALL+CR
623/M10.86680L1 T-ALL-CR
632/M7.53260L1 Pre B ALL-CR

CR: Complete Remission; ALL: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; WBC: White Blood cell; Hgb: Hemoglobin; M: Male; F: Female

Hematological, immunological data of ALL patients and RT-PCR fusion gene amplification CR: Complete Remission; ALL: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; WBC: White Blood cell; Hgb: Hemoglobin; M: Male; F: Female Of 63 patients, 56 children (88.9%) developed leukemia from B-lineage and seven (11.1%) from T-lineage. the immunophenotyping of B-lineage analysis permitted the characterization of 28 cases (44.4%) as early pre B ALL, 22 (34.9%) as pre B ALL and 4 (6.3%) pro B ALL. The co-expression of lymphoid and myeloid antigens shown in Table 2 was confirmed as follows: one (1.6%) with early pre B ALL associated with CD2 co-expression and one (1.6%) was the early pre B along with aberrant expression of CD13.
Table 2

Fusion gene analysis as well as French-American-British classification and comparison with different immunophenotypes in ALL patients

ImmunophenotypePatientsTEL/AML1 positiveL1 L2 L3 ALL
Pro-B 4131
Early pre B 28919531
Early pre B with CD13 111
Early pre B with CD 2 11
Pre B 22101741
T cell 7161
Total 6322471033

ALL: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Fusion gene analysis as well as French-American-British classification and comparison with different immunophenotypes in ALL patients ALL: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia In follow up it was found that 59 patients were at complete remission stage and 4 died. Based on FAB classification of ALL in our results, 47 individuals were of type L1; in which immunologic classification was as follows: 21 early pre B, 17 pre B, 3 pro B and 6 T-ALL. The immunophenotypes of ALL patients with TEL/AML1 fusion transcripts were early pre B, pre B, pro B and T-ALL types. No ETV6/RUNx1 fusion transcripts were detected in early pre B, with CD2 but detected in early pre B along with aberrant expression of CD13. The ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene was identified through RT-PCR among 22 (34.9%) patients in which ten had early pre B, 10 pre B ALL, one pro B and one T-ALL. The prevalence of ETV6/RUNX1 was 37.5% (21/56) in childhood B-lineage ALL. The ETV6/RUNX1+ patients were studied with regard to their gender and it revealed that 12 were females and 10 males (Table 3). Based on FAB classification it must be stated that 13 individuals were type L1; 4 were L2; 2, L3 and 3 were assumed as ALL.
Table 3

Fusion gene analyses and associations with age, white blood cell count and hemoglobin in ALL patients

VariableTEL/AML1Total
PositiveNegative
Age (yr) 1-10203555
>10268
WBC count (×10 3 /µL) <50203858
50-100202
>100033
Hemoglobin (g/dL) <65712
6-10132437
>1041014
Gender Male102939
Female121224
French-American-British classification L1 133447
L2 4610
L3 213
ALL33

ALL: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; WBC: White Blood Cell

Fusion gene analyses and associations with age, white blood cell count and hemoglobin in ALL patients ALL: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; WBC: White Blood Cell In the present study among the 58 patients with WBC count ≤50×103/µL, 20 were TEL/AML1 positive. The patients with WBC count between 50×103/µL and 100×103/µL, 2 were ETV6/RUNX1 positive. However, none of the three patients whose WBC counts were greater than 100×103/µL was ETV6/RUNX1 positive. The immunologic markers in our cases with regard to ETV6/RUNX1+ were as follows: 10 children had early pre B, 10 pre B, 1pro B and 1 T-ALL.

Discussion

The ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene is thought to be the most common leukemia-specific fusion gene in children with ALL. The frequency of 34.9% referring to the ETV6/RUNX1 rearrangement, is the upper 25% average reported in the literature[. It is worth noting that the lower frequency of this fusion gene has also been observed in countries such as India (6%)[, Mexico (9.6%)[, Argentina (11.6%)[, Thailand (12%)[, China (17.9%)[ and Taiwan (19%)[ which indicates a significant difference among them but this difference was not significant in other studies[. The improvement of medical assessment in Iran has resulted in a significant decrease in infant mortality rates caused by ALL. In relation to the immunophenotypes of ALL patients with ETV6/RUNX1 fusion transcripts, P. Tiensiwakul[ found in 35 ALL patients, an incidence of 8.6% of ETV6/RUNX1 translocation (12% of B-lineage ALL), which is lower than that reported in caucasians but is similar to that reported in Japanese and Koreans[, which indicates a significant difference with our study. In the report of Zuo YX et al, FAB-L2 morphology was commonly observed, but t[ was often absent in those children[ which indicates a significant difference with our results. Moreover, for the newly diagnosed B-ALL cases with ETV6/RUNX1 rearrangement, several studies pointed a favorable prognosis[ and some authors have suggested more comprehensive assessment whereas other studies did not identify any significant difference between the prognosis of patients with or without ETV6/RUNX1 rearrangement[. Other known clinical and hematological prognostic factors including age, WBC, and the presence of early hematological response, play an important role in ALL. In a study, the patients were grouped according to their WBC count at the time of diagnosis: the groups consisted of 21 patients with, <50×103/µL one patient with 50-100×103/µL, and three patients with >100×103/µL. Among the 21 patients with WBC count <50×103/µL seven were ETV6/RUNX1 positive. The patient with WBC count between 50 and 100×103/µL was also ETV6/RUNX1 positive. However, none of the three patients whose WBC count was greater than 100×103/µL was ETV6/RUNX1 positive[. So our findings are consistent with those reported in previous literature[. Among the ETV6/RUNX1 fusion gene positive patients 90.9% (20/22) had WBC count ≤50×103/µL, anemia 90.9% (20/22), 95.4% (21/22) with B-lineage immunophenotype, died 4.5% (1/22) and most (20/22) patients were between 1 and 10 years old. In our study, patients aged 1 to 10 years had a better outcome and were similar to the findings in other studies[. More cases will be required for future research to confirm the efficacy of our quantization method using ETV6/RUNX1 fusion transcripts as the target gene for the estimation of disease progression.

Conclusion

The molecular analysis by RT-PCR was shown to be an ideal tool for detecting hybrid transcripts. So, molecular analysis was carried out in every sample, including those that were unsuitable for cytogenetic analysis, the cryopreserved ones and those with little cellularity. Furthermore, molecular analysis is more sensitive and more specific than cytogenetic as it identifies the presence of genetic rearrangements in samples where the cytogenetic result was negative, as well as the absence of important genetic rearrangements in patients with cytogenetically identical translocations. It is known that comprehensive diagnosis of childhood malignancies using molecular assessment is now achievable in Iran. Thus, application of complementary methods to detect clinically relevant specific abnormalities (e.g., ALL with fused gene) is of fundamental importance.
Primer code5’ Position (size)Sequnce (5’-3’)
TEL-A845 (20)TGCACCCTCTGATCCTGAAC
AML1-B611 (19)AACGCCTCGTCATCTTGC
TEL-C928 (22)AAGCCCATCAACCTCTCTATC
AML1-D577 (18)TGGAAGGCGGCGTGAAGC
TEL-E5’692 (20)CGCACCAGGAGAACAACCAC
  27 in total

1.  [Clinical characteristics of children with B cell type acute lymphoblastic leukemia carrying different fusion gene].

Authors:  Ying-Xi Zuo; Le-Ping Zhang; Ai-Dong Lu; Bin Wang; Gui-Lan Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2010-03

2.  Risk- and response-based classification of childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a combined analysis of prognostic markers from the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) and Children's Cancer Group (CCG).

Authors:  Kirk R Schultz; D Jeanette Pullen; Harland N Sather; Jonathan J Shuster; Meenakshi Devidas; Michael J Borowitz; Andrew J Carroll; Nyla A Heerema; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth A Raetz; Naomi J Winick; Stephen P Hunger; William L Carroll; Paul S Gaynon; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Leukemia in twins: lessons in natural history.

Authors:  Mel F Greaves; Ana Teresa Maia; Joseph L Wiemels; Anthony M Ford
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-06-05       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Standardized RT-PCR analysis of fusion gene transcripts from chromosome aberrations in acute leukemia for detection of minimal residual disease. Report of the BIOMED-1 Concerted Action: investigation of minimal residual disease in acute leukemia.

Authors:  J J van Dongen; E A Macintyre; J A Gabert; E Delabesse; V Rossi; G Saglio; E Gottardi; A Rambaldi; G Dotti; F Griesinger; A Parreira; P Gameiro; M G Diáz; M Malec; A W Langerak; J F San Miguel; A Biondi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  High incidence of TEL/AML1 fusion resulting from a cryptic t(12;21) in childhood B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Taiwan.

Authors:  D C Liang; T B Chou; J S Chen; S A Shurtleff; J E Rubnitz; J R Downing; C H Pui; L Y Shih
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui; Leslie L Robison; A Thomas Look
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Gatekeeper function of the RUNX1 transcription factor in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Birte Niebuhr; Meike Fischer; Maike Täger; Jörg Cammenga; Carol Stocking
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  TEL/AML1 fusion gene in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in southern Taiwan.

Authors:  Pei-Chin Lin; Tai-Tsung Chang; Shiu-Ru Lin; Shyh-Shin Chiou; Ren-Chin Jang; Jiunn-Ming Sheen
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  t(12;21): a new recurrent translocation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  S P Romana; M Le Coniat; R Berger
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  The t(12;21) of acute lymphoblastic leukemia results in a tel-AML1 gene fusion.

Authors:  S P Romana; M Mauchauffé; M Le Coniat; I Chumakov; D Le Paslier; R Berger; O A Bernard
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prognostic Value and Outcome for ETV6/RUNX1-Positive Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the South China Children's Leukemia Group.

Authors:  Kun-Yin Qiu; Hong-Gui Xu; Xue-Qun Luo; Hui-Rong Mai; Ning Liao; Li-Hua Yang; Min-Cui Zheng; Wu-Qing Wan; Xue-Dong Wu; Ri-Yang Liu; Qi-Wen Chen; Hui-Qin Chen; Xiao-Fei Sun; Hua Jiang; Xing-Jiang Long; Guo-Hua Chen; Xin-Yu Li; Chang-Gang Li; Li-Bin Huang; Ya-Yun Ling; Dan-Na Lin; Chuan Wen; Wen-Yong Kuang; Xiao-Qin Feng; Zhong-Lv Ye; Bei-Yan Wu; Xiang-Lin He; Qiao-Ru Li; Li-Na Wang; Xian-Ling Kong; Lu-Hong Xu; Chi-Kong Li; Jian-Pei Fang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 2.  Genetics of blood malignancies among Iranian population: an overview.

Authors:  Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan; Amir Sadra Zangouei; Seyed Mohammad Hosseinirad; Majid Mojarrad; Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.644

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.