BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The psychoactive cannabinoid Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and the non-psychoactive cannabinoid cannabidiol (CBD) can both reduce cancer progression, each through distinct anti-tumour pathways. Our goal was to discover a compound that could efficiently target both cannabinoid anti-tumour pathways. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: To measure breast cancer cell proliferation/viability and invasion, MTT and Boyden chamber assays were used. Modulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis was measured using dichlorodihydrofluorescein and annexin/propidium iodide, respectively, in combination with cell flow cytometry. Changes in protein levels were evaluated using Western analysis. Orthotopic and i.v. mouse models of breast cancer metastasis were used to test the activity of cannabinoids in vivo. KEY RESULTS: CBD reduced breast cancer metastasis in advanced stages of the disease as the direct result of down-regulating the transcriptional regulator Id1. However, this was associated with moderate increases in survival. We therefore screened for analogues that could co-target cannabinoid anti-tumour pathways (CBD- and THC-associated) and discovered the compound O-1663. This analogue inhibited Id1, produced a marked stimulation of ROS, up-regulated autophagy and induced apoptosis. Of all the compounds tested, it was the most potent at inhibiting breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion in culture and metastasis in vivo. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: O-1663 prolonged survival in advanced stages of breast cancer metastasis. Developing compounds that can simultaneously target multiple cannabinoid anti-tumour pathways efficiently may provide a novel approach for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The psychoactive cannabinoid Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and the non-psychoactive cannabinoidcannabidiol (CBD) can both reduce cancer progression, each through distinct anti-tumour pathways. Our goal was to discover a compound that could efficiently target both cannabinoid anti-tumour pathways. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: To measure breast cancer cell proliferation/viability and invasion, MTT and Boyden chamber assays were used. Modulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis was measured using dichlorodihydrofluorescein and annexin/propidium iodide, respectively, in combination with cell flow cytometry. Changes in protein levels were evaluated using Western analysis. Orthotopic and i.v. mouse models of breast cancer metastasis were used to test the activity of cannabinoids in vivo. KEY RESULTS:CBD reduced breast cancer metastasis in advanced stages of the disease as the direct result of down-regulating the transcriptional regulator Id1. However, this was associated with moderate increases in survival. We therefore screened for analogues that could co-target cannabinoid anti-tumour pathways (CBD- and THC-associated) and discovered the compound O-1663. This analogue inhibited Id1, produced a marked stimulation of ROS, up-regulated autophagy and induced apoptosis. Of all the compounds tested, it was the most potent at inhibiting breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion in culture and metastasis in vivo. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: O-1663 prolonged survival in advanced stages of breast cancer metastasis. Developing compounds that can simultaneously target multiple cannabinoid anti-tumour pathways efficiently may provide a novel approach for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Authors: Sean D McAllister; Qing Tao; Judy Barnett-Norris; Kurt Buehner; Dow P Hurst; Frank Guarnieri; Patricia H Reggio; Katharine W Nowell Harmon; Guy A Cabral; Mary E Abood Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Sofía Torres; Mar Lorente; Fátima Rodríguez-Fornés; Sonia Hernández-Tiedra; María Salazar; Elena García-Taboada; Juan Barcia; Manuel Guzmán; Guillermo Velasco Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Mariano Ponz-Sarvisé; Paul A Nguewa; María J Pajares; Jackeline Agorreta; María D Lozano; Miriam Redrado; Ruben Pio; Carmen Behrens; Ignacio I Wistuba; Carlos E García-Franco; Jesús García-Foncillas; Luis M Montuenga; Alfonso Calvo; Ignacio Gil-Bazo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jahan P Marcu; Rigel T Christian; Darryl Lau; Anne J Zielinski; Maxx P Horowitz; Jasmine Lee; Arash Pakdel; Juanita Allison; Chandani Limbad; Dan H Moore; Garret L Yount; Pierre-Yves Desprez; Sean D McAllister Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: P Massi; M Valenti; A Vaccani; V Gasperi; G Perletti; E Marras; F Fezza; M Maccarrone; D Parolaro Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2007-11-17 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: C C Felder; K E Joyce; E M Briley; J Mansouri; K Mackie; O Blond; Y Lai; A L Ma; R L Mitchell Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Stephen P H Alexander; O Peter Buneman; Anthony P Davenport; John C McGrath; John A Peters; Christopher Southan; Michael Spedding; Wenyuan Yu; Anthony J Harmar Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: E Singer; J Judkins; N Salomonis; L Matlaf; P Soteropoulos; S McAllister; L Soroceanu Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2015-01-15 Impact factor: 8.469