Literature DB >> 24910153

Complete tribal sampling reveals basal split in Muscidae (Diptera), confirms saprophagy as ancestral feeding mode, and reveals an evolutionary correlation between instar numbers and carnivory.

Sujatha Narayanan Kutty1, Adrian C Pont2, Rudolf Meier3, Thomas Pape4.   

Abstract

With about 5000 species in ca. 180 genera, the Muscidae is the most species-rich family in the muscoid grade of Calyptratae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha), the others being the Fanniidae, Scathophagidae and Anthomyiidae. Muscidae is remarkable for its young age, high species diversity in all biogeographic regions, and an unusually diverse range of feeding habits at the larval stage (e.g., saprophagy, phytophagy, carnivory, endoparasitism, haematophagy). We here review muscid classification and biology and present a molecular phylogeny based on four mitochondrial genes (12S, 16S, COI, CYTB) and three nuclear genes (28S, Ef1a, and CAD) for 84 species from 40 genera. Our analysis is the first to include species from all biogeographic regions and all currently recognised muscid subfamilies and tribes. We provide strong support for the monophyly of the Muscidae, and for the first time also for the first split within this family. The ancestral larval feeding habit is reconstructed to be saprophagy with more specialised coprophagous saprophagy, phytophagy, and carnivory evolving multiple times from saprophagous ancestors. The origins of carnivory in larvae are significantly correlated with a reduction of the number of larval instars from three (ancestral) to two and one. The genus Achanthiptera which was previously in its own subfamily is shown to be closely related to Azeliini. However, it appears that Azeliinae is paraphyletic because Muscinae is sister-group to the Azeliini while the azeliine Reinwardtiini are polyphyletic. Coenosiinae and Muscinae are monophyletic, but Muscini is paraphyletic with regard to Stomoxyini. Because many subfamilies are apparently para- or even polyphyletic, we review the history of muscid classification in order to reveal how the currently used classification originated.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calyptratae; Larval biology; Molecular phylogeny; Muscidae

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24910153     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  5 in total

1.  Application of DNA barcoding for identifying forensically relevant Diptera from northern Thailand.

Authors:  Barbara Karolina Zajac; Narin Sontigun; Anchalee Wannasan; Marcel A Verhoff; Kabkaew Sukontason; Jens Amendt; Richard Zehner
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Phylogenetic inference of calyptrates, with the first mitogenomes for Gasterophilinae (Diptera: Oestridae) and Paramacronychiinae (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).

Authors:  Dong Zhang; Liping Yan; Ming Zhang; Hongjun Chu; Jie Cao; Kai Li; Defu Hu; Thomas Pape
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 6.580

3.  First fossil of an oestroid fly (Diptera: Calyptratae: Oestroidea) and the dating of oestroid divergences.

Authors:  Pierfilippo Cerretti; John O Stireman; Thomas Pape; James E O'Hara; Marco A T Marinho; Knut Rognes; David A Grimaldi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Identification of Muscidae (Diptera) of medico-legal importance by means of wing measurements.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzywacz; Jakub Ogiela; Adam Tofilski
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Antennal and palpal sensilla of three predatory Lispe species (Diptera: Muscidae): an ultrastructural investigation.

Authors:  Genting Liu; Qike Wang; Xianhui Liu; Xinyu Li; Xiunan Pang; Dong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.