Literature DB >> 24910133

Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability.

Samuele Zilioli1, Aaron N Sell2, Michael Stirrat3, Justin Jagore1, William Vickerman1, Neil V Watson1.   

Abstract

Humans can accurately extract information about men's formidability from their faces; however, the actual facial cues that inform these judgments have not been established. Here, through three studies, we test the hypothesis that bizygomatic width (i.e. facial width-to-height ratio, fWHR) covaries with actual physical formidability (hypothesis #1) and that humans use this cue when making assessments of formidability (hypothesis #2). Our data confirm that fWHR is predictive of actual fighting ability among professional combatants (study 1). We further show that subjects' assessments of formidability covary with the target's fWHR on natural faces (study 2), computer-generated images of strong and weak faces (study 2), and experimentally manipulated computer-generated faces (study 3). These results support the hypothesis that bizygomatic width is a cue of formidability that is assessed during agonistic encounters.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary psychology; facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR); formidability; physical strength; resource-holding potential (RHP)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24910133     DOI: 10.1002/ab.21544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aggress Behav        ISSN: 0096-140X            Impact factor:   2.917


  20 in total

1.  Testosterone reduces the threat premium in competitive resource division.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Valentina Proietti; Brian M Bird; Triana L Ortiz; Pierre L Bonin; Bernard Goldfarb; Neil V Watson; Justin M Carré
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Using knowledge from human research to improve understanding of contest theory and contest dynamics.

Authors:  Michael M Kasumovic; Khandis Blake; Thomas F Denson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness.

Authors:  Aaron Sell; Aaron W Lukazsweski; Michael Townsley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness.

Authors:  Stephanie Summersby; Bonnie Harris; Thomas F Denson; David White
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.653

5.  Correlated evolution of personality, morphology and performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth M A Kern; Detric Robinson; Erika Gass; John Godwin; R Brian Langerhans
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

Review 7.  Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.

Authors:  Shawn N Geniole; Thomas F Denson; Barnaby J Dixson; Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Men's facial width-to-height ratio predicts aggression: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael P Haselhuhn; Margaret E Ormiston; Elaine M Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Social status, facial structure, and assertiveness in brown capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Justin M Carré
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N Hanson Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.