Literature DB >> 24909592

Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment.

Karyn K Storey1, Karen Muñoz, Lauri Nelson, Jeffery Larsen, Karl White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of ambient noise on the accuracy of thresholds obtained using the KUDUwave portable clinical audiometer as compared to those obtained using a GSI-61 clinical audiometer in a sound booth.
DESIGN: Pure-tone air conduction thresholds were obtained in three conditions: (1) with a clinical audiometer in a quiet sound booth, (2) with the KUDUwave in a quiet sound booth, and (3) with the KUDUwave with 40 dBA of background noise. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 31 individuals ranging in age from 15 to 80 years participated in the study, 21 with normal hearing and ten with hearing loss.
RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of thresholds obtained with the KUDUwave in quiet, and 92% of thresholds obtained with the KUDUwave in background noise were within 5 dB of those obtained with the clinical audiometer. Accuracy was poorer at 250 Hz and 8000 Hz.
CONCLUSION: Ambient noise typical of that found in a non-sound-treated room, did not affect the accuracy of air conduction hearing thresholds obtained with the KUDUwave. The KUDUwave may be a viable method of testing when a clinical audiometer and sound booth are not available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral measures; instrumentation; medical audiology; noise

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24909592     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.920110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  6 in total

1.  Mobile tablet audiometry in fluctuating autoimmune ear disease.

Authors:  Scott Kohlert; Matthew Bromwich
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-07

2.  Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer.

Authors:  Mark Bastianelli; Amy E Mark; Arran McAfee; David Schramm; Renée Lefrançois; Matthew Bromwich
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-07

Review 3.  Digital Approaches to Automated and Machine Learning Assessments of Hearing: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Jan-Willem Wasmann; Leontien Pragt; Robert Eikelboom; De Wet Swanepoel
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Validity of automated audiometry for hearing examination in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Nyilo Purnami; Rian W Palandeng; Soedarsono -; Dhany Arifianto; In Seok Moon
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-12-14

Review 5.  Self-Fitting Hearing Aids: Status Quo and Future Predictions.

Authors:  Gitte Keidser; Elizabeth Convery
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Assessing the efficacy of asynchronous telehealth-based hearing screening and diagnostic services using automated audiometry in a rural South African school.

Authors:  Samantha M Govender; Maurice Mars
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.