BACKGROUND: Canine atopic dermatitis is a genetically predisposed inflammatory skin disease often requiring multimodal treatment. There is a need to find further low-risk adjunctive therapies. HYPOTHESIS/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the localized effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the paws of dogs with atopic dermatitis using a localized canine atopic dermatitis severity score (LCADSS) and owner localized pruritic visual analog score (LPVAS) in comparison to treatment with a placebo. ANIMALS: Thirty client-owned dogs with symmetrical pedal pruritus due to canine atopic dermatitis. METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned into two groups. In each group, one paw was treated with LLLT and one paw treated with a placebo laser (comparing either both fore- or hindpaws). Treatments were administered at 4 J/cm(2) (area from carpus/tarsus to distal aspect of digit 3) three times per week for the first 2 weeks and two times per week for the second 2 weeks. Scores were assessed for each paw at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 5. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in LCADSS or LPVAS between LLLT and placebo treatments between weeks 0 and 5 (P = 0.0856 and 0.5017, respectively). However, LCADSS and LPVAS significantly decreased from week 0 at weeks 2, 4 and 5 in both LLLT and placebo groups (P < 0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Low-level laser therapy is not an effective localized treatment for pedal pruritus in canine atopic dermatitis.
BACKGROUND:Canineatopic dermatitis is a genetically predisposed inflammatory skin disease often requiring multimodal treatment. There is a need to find further low-risk adjunctive therapies. HYPOTHESIS/ OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the localized effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the paws of dogs with atopic dermatitis using a localized canineatopic dermatitis severity score (LCADSS) and owner localized pruritic visual analog score (LPVAS) in comparison to treatment with a placebo. ANIMALS: Thirty client-owned dogs with symmetrical pedal pruritus due to canineatopic dermatitis. METHODS:Dogs were randomly assigned into two groups. In each group, one paw was treated with LLLT and one paw treated with a placebo laser (comparing either both fore- or hindpaws). Treatments were administered at 4 J/cm(2) (area from carpus/tarsus to distal aspect of digit 3) three times per week for the first 2 weeks and two times per week for the second 2 weeks. Scores were assessed for each paw at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 5. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in LCADSS or LPVAS between LLLT and placebo treatments between weeks 0 and 5 (P = 0.0856 and 0.5017, respectively). However, LCADSS and LPVAS significantly decreased from week 0 at weeks 2, 4 and 5 in both LLLT and placebo groups (P < 0.0001 for all). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Low-level laser therapy is not an effective localized treatment for pedal pruritus in canineatopic dermatitis.
Authors: Victoria A Wickenheisser; Emilia Marta Zywot; Emily Mary Rabjohns; Hyun Ho Lee; David S Lawrence; Teresa Kathleen Tarrant Journal: Curr Allergy Asthma Rep Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 4.806
Authors: Thierry Olivry; Douglas J DeBoer; Claude Favrot; Hilary A Jackson; Ralf S Mueller; Tim Nuttall; Pascal Prélaud Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2015-08-16 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Andrea Marchegiani; Alessandro Fruganti; Andrea Spaterna; Matteo Cerquetella; Adolfo M Tambella; Susan Paterson Journal: Vet Med Int Date: 2021-01-09