Literature DB >> 24909042

Emotional demands as a risk factor for mental distress among nurses.

C Balducci, L Avanzi, F Fraccaroli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it is widely acknowledged that in certain occupations emotional demands may be a critical phenomenon for workers' health, this has been traditionally taken for granted and their role in the stress process has not often been directly assessed.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between emotional demands and mental distress, adjusting for the potential effect of common psychosocial factors (workload, job control, social support, role stressors, and poor relationships) and personal psychological factors (i.e. having been diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorder).
METHODS: A cross-sectional study on a sample of nurses of the National Healthcare Service was carried out (N = 256, 81.3% women). The psychosocial factors considered were assessed by means of widely known and validated scales. The examined health outcome (i.e. mental distress) was operationalized by means of the General Health Questionnaire (12-item version). Covariates: gender, age, tenure and shiftwork. ANALYSES: a series of logistic regressions.
RESULTS: Exposure to emotional demands was a risk factor for mental distress. The resulting risk was not altered when adjusting for other psychosocial and personal factors. In the final model emotional demands, workload and role stressors, in addition to having been diagnosed with anxiety or depressive disorder, were significant risk factors for nurses' mental distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Emotional demands may substantially impact on nurses mental distress. These results give rise to concern in relation to work-stress prevention in certain professions, given that emotional demands are not included in the most common psychosocial risk assessment tools currently available, which may then miss identifying an important precondition of work stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24909042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Lav        ISSN: 0025-7818            Impact factor:   1.275


  8 in total

1.  Item-Level Psychometric Analysis of the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT) in Workers.

Authors:  César Merino-Soto; Arturo Juárez-García; Guillermo Salinas-Escudero; Filiberto Toledano-Toledano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Healthcare Workers: Occupational Health Promotion and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Pilar Baylina; Carla Barros; Carla Fonte; Sónia Alves; Álvaro Rocha
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Development and validation of Emotional Labour in Nursing Scale in Italy.

Authors:  Sondra Badolamenti; Valentina Biagioli; Francesco Zaghini; Rosario Caruso; Alessandro Sili
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 1.275

4.  Mental Illness and Work-Related Limitations in Healthcare Workers: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Sara Gostoli; Laura Nicolucci; Carlotta Malaguti; Chiara Patierno; Danilo Carrozzino; Cristian Balducci; Sara Zaniboni; Vittorio Lodi; Carmine Petio; Chiara Rafanelli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  How workers' emotional dissonance explains the association between customers' relations, burnout and health in an Italian supermarket chain.

Authors:  Michela Vignoli; Greta Mazzetti; Daniela Converso; Dina Guglielmi
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 1.275

6.  Verbal Aggression from Care Recipients as a Risk Factor among Nursing Staff: A Study on Burnout in the JD-R Model Perspective.

Authors:  Sara Viotti; Silvia Gilardi; Chiara Guglielmetti; Daniela Converso
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  High strain and low social support at work as risk factors for being the target of third-party workplace violence among healthcare sector workers.

Authors:  Cristian Balducci; Michela Vignoli; Gloria Dalla Rosa; Chiara Consiglio
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 1.275

8.  The Importance of Contextualized Psychosocial Risk Indicators in Workplace Stress Assessment: Evidence from the Healthcare Sector.

Authors:  Luca Menghini; Cristian Balducci
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.