Literature DB >> 24907926

In situ micropillar compression reveals superior strength and ductility but an absence of damage in lamellar bone.

Jakob Schwiedrzik1, Rejin Raghavan2, Alexander Bürki1, Victor LeNader3, Uwe Wolfram1, Johann Michler2, Philippe Zysset4.   

Abstract

Ageing societies suffer from an increasing incidence of bone fractures. Bone strength depends on the amount of mineral measured by clinical densitometry, but also on the micromechanical properties of the hierarchical organization of bone. Here, we investigate the mechanical response under monotonic and cyclic compression of both single osteonal lamellae and macroscopic samples containing numerous osteons. Micropillar compression tests in a scanning electron microscope, microindentation and macroscopic compression tests were performed on dry ovine bone to identify the elastic modulus, yield stress, plastic deformation, damage accumulation and failure mechanisms. We found that isolated lamellae exhibit a plastic behaviour, with higher yield stress and ductility but no damage. In agreement with a proposed rheological model, these experiments illustrate a transition from a ductile mechanical behaviour of bone at the microscale to a quasi-brittle response driven by the growth of cracks along interfaces or in the vicinity of pores at the macroscale.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907926     DOI: 10.1038/nmat3959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Mater        ISSN: 1476-1122            Impact factor:   43.841


  36 in total

1.  An improved labelling technique for monitoring microcrack growth in compact bone.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue.

Authors:  D T Reilly; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Nanogranular origins of the strength of bone.

Authors:  Kuangshin Tai; Franz-Josef Ulm; Christine Ortiz
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Anuradha Roy; Xinmei Shen; Rae L Acuna; Jerrod H Tyler; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Intrafibrillar plasticity through mineral/collagen sliding is the dominant mechanism for the extreme toughness of antler bone.

Authors:  H S Gupta; S Krauss; M Kerschnitzki; A Karunaratne; J W C Dunlop; A H Barber; P Boesecke; S S Funari; P Fratzl
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-04-09

Review 6.  The use of nanoindentation for characterizing the properties of mineralized hard tissues: state-of-the art review.

Authors:  Gladius Lewis; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone.

Authors:  J Y Rho; L Kuhn-Spearing; P Zioupos
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 8.  Porosity and specific surface of bone.

Authors:  R B Martin
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1984

9.  Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions.

Authors:  S Hengsberger; A Kulik; Ph Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Characterization of indentation response and stiffness reduction of bone using a continuum damage model.

Authors:  Jingzhou Zhang; Michelle M Michalenko; Ellen Kuhl; Timothy C Ovaert
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2009-08-11
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Splitting fracture in bovine bone using a porosity-based spring network model.

Authors:  Ashwij Mayya; P Praveen; Anuradha Banerjee; R Rajesh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The nanocomposite nature of bone drives its strength and damage resistance.

Authors:  Ottman A Tertuliano; Julia R Greer
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 4.  Post-yield and failure properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  Uwe Wolfram; Jakob Schwiedrzik
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-08-24

Review 5.  Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Mathilde Granke; Robert C Singleton; George M Pharr
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 6.  Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Ginu U Unnikrisnan; Amira I Hussein
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Intrafibrillar mineralization deficiency and osteogenesis imperfecta mouse bone fragility.

Authors:  Mohammad Maghsoudi-Ganjeh; Jitin Samuel; Abu Saleh Ahsan; Xiaodu Wang; Xiaowei Zeng
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-02-13

8.  Excellent mechanical properties of taenite in meteoric iron.

Authors:  Shohei Ueki; Yoji Mine; Kazuki Takashima
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Biomechanical Properties of Metastatically Involved Osteolytic Bone.

Authors:  Cari M Whyne; Dallis Ferguson; Allison Clement; Mohammedayaz Rangrez; Michael Hardisty
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Heat impact during laser ablation extraction of mineralised tissue micropillars.

Authors:  Samuel McPhee; Alexander Groetsch; Jonathan D Shephard; Uwe Wolfram
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.