Literature DB >> 20129418

Characterization of indentation response and stiffness reduction of bone using a continuum damage model.

Jingzhou Zhang1, Michelle M Michalenko, Ellen Kuhl, Timothy C Ovaert.   

Abstract

Indentation tests can be used to characterize the mechanical properties of bone at small load/length scales offering the possibility of utilizing very small test specimens, which can be excised using minimally-invasive procedures. In addition, the need for mechanical property data from bone may be a requirement for fundamental multi-scale experiments, changes in nano- and micro-mechanical properties (e.g., as affected by changes in bone mineral density) due to drug therapies, and/or the development of computational models. Load vs. indentation depth data, however, is more complex than those obtained from typical macro-scale experiments, primarily due to the mixed state of stress, and thus interpretation of the data and extraction of mechanical properties is more challenging. Previous studies have shown that cortical bone exhibits a visco-elastic response combined with permanent deformation during indentation tests, and that the load vs. indentation depth response can be simulated using a visco-elastic/plastic material model. The model successfully captures the loading and creep displacement behavior, however, it does not adequately reproduce the unloading response near the end of the unloading cycle, where a pronounced decrease in contact stiffness is observed. It is proposed that the stiffness reduction observed in bone results from an increase in damage; therefore, a plastic-damage model was investigated and shown capable of simulating a typical bone indentation response through an axisymmetric finite element simulation. The plastic-damage model was able to reproduce the full indentation response, especially the reduced stiffness behavior exhibited during the latter stages of unloading. The results suggest that the plastic-damage model is suitable for describing the complex indentation response of bone and may provide further insight into the relationship between model parameters and mechanical/physical properties. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20129418      PMCID: PMC2818081          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  25 in total

1.  High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone.

Authors:  G L Niebur; M J Feldstein; J C Yuen; T J Chen; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Sensitivity of damage predictions to tissue level yield properties and apparent loading conditions.

Authors:  G L Niebur; J C Yuen; A J Burghardt; T M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Tensile damage and its effects on cortical bone.

Authors:  S P Kotha; N Guzelsu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effects of raloxifene on bone density, biomarkers, and histomorphometric and biomechanical measures in ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Cynthia J Lees; Thomas C Register; Charles H Turner; Tongyu Wang; Melanie Stancill; Christopher P Jerome
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Calibration of a constitutive model for the post-yield behaviour of cortical bone.

Authors:  L P Mullins; M S Bruzzi; P E McHugh
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2008-11-21

6.  Compact bone fatigue damage--I. Residual strength and stiffness.

Authors:  D R Carter; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Permanent deformation of compact bone monitored by acoustic emission.

Authors:  T M Wright; F Vosburgh; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A hypothetical mechanism for the stimulation of osteonal remodelling by fatigue damage.

Authors:  R B Martin; D B Burr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Microcrack accumulation at different intervals during fatigue testing of compact bone.

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Microcracking in dog bone under load. A biomechanical study of bone visco-elasticity.

Authors:  U Jonsson; K Eriksson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1984-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Mechanical properties of gray and white matter brain tissue by indentation.

Authors:  Silvia Budday; Richard Nay; Rijk de Rooij; Paul Steinmann; Thomas Wyrobek; Timothy C Ovaert; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-03-02

2.  In situ micropillar compression reveals superior strength and ductility but an absence of damage in lamellar bone.

Authors:  Jakob Schwiedrzik; Rejin Raghavan; Alexander Bürki; Victor LeNader; Uwe Wolfram; Johann Michler; Philippe Zysset
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  The effect of holding time on nanoindentation measurements of creep in bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Tyler A Baker; Timothy C Ovaert; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Indentation experiments and simulation of ovine bone using a viscoelastic-plastic damage model.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Ziheng Wu; Simon Turner; Jennifer MacLeay; Glen L Niebur; Timothy C Ovaert
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 3.089

5.  Bipolar Hemarthroplasty Using Cementless Conical Stem for Treatment of Dorr Type B and C Femoral Neck Fracture.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Kang; Sang Hong Lee; Sung Jung
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-12-30

6.  Direct comparison of nanoindentation and macroscopic measurements of bone viscoelasticity.

Authors:  Tara N Shepherd; Jingzhou Zhang; Timothy C Ovaert; Ryan K Roeder; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-07-18

Review 7.  Post-yield and failure properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  Uwe Wolfram; Jakob Schwiedrzik
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-08-24

8.  The role of mechanics during brain development.

Authors:  Silvia Budday; Paul Steinmann; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  J Mech Phys Solids       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.471

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.