Literature DB >> 24907025

Latarjet, Bristow, and Eden-Hybinette procedures for anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature.

Umile Giuseppe Longo1, Mattia Loppini2, Giacomo Rizzello2, Mauro Ciuffreda2, Nicola Maffulli2, Vincenzo Denaro2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome, rate of recurrence, complications, and rate of postoperative osteoarthritis in patients with anterior shoulder instability managed with Latarjet, Bristow, or Eden-Hybinette procedures.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature on management of anterior dislocation of the shoulder with glenoid bony procedures was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases using various combinations of the keywords "shoulder," "dislocation," "treatment," "Latarjet," "Bristow," "bone loss," "Eden-Hybinette," "iliac," "bone," "block," "clinical," "outcome," and "Bankart." The following data were extracted: demographics, bone defects and other lesions, type of surgery, outcome measurement, range of motion (ROM), recurrence of instability, complications, and osteoarthritis. A quantitative synthesis of all comparative studies was performed to compare bone block procedures and Bankart repair in terms of postoperative recurrence of instability and osteoarthritis.
RESULTS: Forty-six studies were included and 3,211 shoulders were evaluated. The mean value of the Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was 65 points. Preoperatively, the injuries detected most were glenoid bone loss and Bankart lesions. The Eden-Hybinette procedure had the highest rate of postoperative osteoarthritis and recurrence. Pooled results from comparative studies showed that the bone block procedures were associated with a lower rate of recurrence when compared with Bankart repair (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.74; P = .002), whereas there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative osteoarthritis (P = .79).
CONCLUSIONS: The open Bristow-Latarjet procedure continues to be a valid surgical option to treat patients with anterior shoulder instability. Bone block procedures were associated with a lower rate of recurrence when compared with the Bankart repair. The Eden-Hybinette procedure has clinical outcomes very similar to the Bristow-Latarjet technique but has a higher rate of postoperative osteoarthritis and recurrence. An arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet procedure seems to be better in terms of prevention of recurrence and rehabilitation, but randomized studies are needed to reach definitive conclusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24907025     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  54 in total

1.  The Bristow-Latarjet procedure, a historical note on a technique in comeback.

Authors:  J A van der Linde; R van Wijngaarden; M P Somford; D F P van Deurzen; M P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  History of shoulder instability surgery.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Davide Cucchi; Usman Butt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Is the Latarjet procedure risky? Analysis of complications and learning curve.

Authors:  Florence Dauzère; Amélie Faraud; Julie Lebon; Marie Faruch; Pierre Mansat; Nicolas Bonnevialle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Posterior bone block of chronic locked posterior shoulder dislocations with glenoid augmentation: a retrospective evaluation of ten shoulders.

Authors:  Mehmet Atıf Erol Aksekili; Mahmut Uğurlu; Çetin Işık; Kağan Yüksel; Vedat Biçici; Murat Bozkurt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Management of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair versus Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Nam Su Cho; Jae Hyun Yoo; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Graft position and fusion rate following arthroscopic Latarjet.

Authors:  Laurent Casabianca; Antoine Gerometta; Audrey Massein; Frederic Khiami; Romain Rousseau; Alexandre Hardy; Hugues Pascal-Moussellard; Philippe Loriaut
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Suture anchor fixation strength in the Latarjet procedure: a biomechanical study in cadavers.

Authors:  Behzad Saleky; Onur Hapa; Yagmur Isin; Mustafa Güvençer; Hasan Havıtçıoğlu; Bora Uzun
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-27

8.  Arthroscopic double bone block augmentation is a salvage procedure for anterior and posterior shoulder instability secondary to glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  David Haeni; Matthieu Sanchez; Plath Johannes; Lilling Victoria; Dan Henderson; Jeremy Munji; Kalojan Petkin; Laurent Lafosse
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Arthroscopic treatment of glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  Ettore Taverna; Guido Garavaglia; Henri Ufenast; Riccardo D'Ambrosi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis.

Authors:  G Cunningham; S Benchouk; O Kherad; A Lädermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.