Literature DB >> 26044354

Management of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair versus Latarjet procedure.

Nam Su Cho1, Jae Hyun Yoo1, Yong Girl Rhee2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair and Latarjet operation in patients with a large engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.
METHODS: Thirty-seven shoulders subjected to arthroscopic remplissage with a Bankart repair (group A) and 35 shoulders subjected to a Latarjet operation (group B), for a large engaging Hill-Sachs lesion without significant glenoid bone loss, were retrospectively evaluated. Each group was followed up for a mean more than 2-year period.
RESULTS: At the last follow-up, postoperative pain, shoulder mobility, muscle strength, Rowe score, and UCLA score revealed no significant difference between the two groups. The postoperative mean deficit in external rotation at the side (ERs) was 8° ± 23° in group A (P = 0.044). In group B, the mean deficits in ERs, external rotation at 90° of abduction, and internal rotation to the posterior were 10° ± 20°, 7° ± 16°, and 1.9° ± 4°, respectively (P = 0.004, 0.022, and 0.009, respectively). The recurrence rate was 5.4 % (two shoulders) in group A and 5.7 % (two shoulders) in group B (n.s.). The overall complication rate was significantly higher in group B (14.3 %) than in group A (0 %) (P = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS: For recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a large engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, both arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair and the Latarjet procedure were safe and reliable techniques with a low recurrence rate. However, the Latarjet group had a significantly higher postoperative complication rate than the remplissage group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior instability; Bankart repair; Clinical outcome; Complication; Engaging Hill–Sachs lesion; Latarjet; Recurrence; Remplissage; Shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26044354     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3666-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  43 in total

1.  [Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder].

Authors:  M LATARJET
Journal:  Lyon Chir       Date:  1954 Nov-Dec

2.  Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Anup A Shah; R Bryan Butler; James Romanowski; Danny Goel; Dimitrios Karadagli; Jon J P Warner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Subscapularis dysfunction following anterior surgical approaches to the shoulder.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Peter Habermeyer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Rotation osteotomy of the proximal humerus to stabilise the shoulder. Five years' experience.

Authors:  M Kronberg; L A Broström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-11

5.  The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study.

Authors:  C R Rowe; D Patel; W W Southmayd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic bankart repairs for anterior instability.

Authors:  James E Voos; Ryan W Livermore; Brian T Feeley; David W Altchek; Riley J Williams; Russell F Warren; Frank A Cordasco; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrence of anterior instability of the shoulder after operative repair: a retrospective case series of forty-nine consecutive patients.

Authors:  Samuel L Schmid; Mazda Farshad; Sabrina Catanzaro; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation.

Authors:  F Balg; P Boileau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-11

9.  Results of modified Latarjet reconstruction in patients with anteroinferior instability and significant bone loss.

Authors:  Stephen S Burkhart; Joe F De Beer; Johannes R H Barth; Tim Cresswell; Tim Criswell; Chris Roberts; David P Richards
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  The stabilizing mechanism of the Latarjet procedure: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Takayuki Muraki; Kai-Nan An; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield; Eiji Itoi; Gilles Walch; Scott P Steinmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  19 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of the Latarjet procedure with and without a coracoid bone block.

Authors:  W Barrett Payne; Matthew T Kleiner; Michelle H McGarry; James E Tibone; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anatomic Humeral Head Reconstruction With Fresh Osteochondral Talus Allograft for Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability With Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion.

Authors:  Matthew T Provencher; George Sanchez; Katrina Schantz; Marcio Ferrari; Anthony Sanchez; Salvatore Frangiamore; Sandeep Mannava
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-02-27

3.  Return to sports after the latarjet procedure: high return level of non-collision athletes.

Authors:  Young Moon Kee; Jung Youn Kim; Hwan Jin Kim; Chan Teak Lim; Yong Girl Rhee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopic Remplissage and Open Latarjet Procedure for the Treatment of Anterior Glenohumeral Instability With Severe Bipolar Bone Loss.

Authors:  J Christoph Katthagen; Jack Anavian; Dimitri S Tahal; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-10

5.  Return to Sport After Coracoid Bone Block Transfer for Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Nadeem; Seline Vancolen; Nolan S Horner; Asheesh Bedi; Bashar Alolabi; Moin Khan
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-10-18

6.  Glenoid bone augmentation: a contemporary and comprehensive systematic review of open procedures.

Authors:  Ryan Falbo; Austin Moore; Amy Singleton; Annie Steffenson; Jason Levine; Richard Miller
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 7.  Managing Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability-Techniques and Outcomes: a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Carlos Prada; Omar A Al-Mohrej; Ashaka Patel; Breanne Flood; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-12-28

8.  Arthroscopic double bone block augmentation is a salvage procedure for anterior and posterior shoulder instability secondary to glenoid bone loss.

Authors:  David Haeni; Matthieu Sanchez; Plath Johannes; Lilling Victoria; Dan Henderson; Jeremy Munji; Kalojan Petkin; Laurent Lafosse
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Fate of coracoid grafts after the Latarjet procedure: will be analogous to the original glenoid by remodelling.

Authors:  Young Moon Kee; Jung Youn Kim; Hwan Jin Kim; Skand Sinha; Yong-Girl Rhee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Patient Outcomes and Fear of Returning to Sports After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage.

Authors:  Sijia Feng; Mo Chen; Jun Chen; Hong Li; Jiwu Chen; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.