Literature DB >> 24906462

Barriers to the uptake and use of feedback in the context of summative assessment.

Christopher J Harrison1, Karen D Könings, Lambert Schuwirth, Valerie Wass, Cees van der Vleuten.   

Abstract

Despite calls for feedback to be incorporated in all assessments, a dichotomy exists between formative and summative assessments. When feedback is provided in a summative context, it is not always used effectively by learners. In this study we explored the reasons for this. We conducted individual interviews with 17 students who had recently received web based feedback following a summative assessment. Constant comparative analysis was conducted for recurring themes. The summative assessment culture, with a focus on avoiding failure, was a dominant and negative influence on the use of feedback. Strong emotions were prevalent throughout the period of assessment and feedback, which reinforced the focus on the need to pass, rather than excel. These affective factors were heightened by interactions with others. The influence of prior learning experiences affected expectations about achievement and the need to use feedback. The summative assessment and subsequent feedback appeared disconnected from future clinical workplace learning. Socio-cultural influences and barriers to feedback need to be understood before attempting to provide feedback after all assessments. A move away from the summative assessment culture may be needed in order to maximise the learning potential of assessments.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24906462     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-014-9524-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  21 in total

1.  Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Karen D Könings; Shiphra Ginsburg; Cees Pm van der Vleuten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Perceptions of Physical Therapy Students on their Psychomotor Examinations: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Kelly Macauley; Stephanie Laprino; Tracy Brudvig
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 3.  Emotion as reflexive practice: A new discourse for feedback practice and research.

Authors:  Rola Ajjawi; Rebecca E Olson; Nancy McNaughton
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 7.647

4.  Sharing perspectives on feedback: a combined resident-faculty workshop.

Authors:  Bo Kim; Aishwarya Rajagopalan; Edward M Tabasky; Sparsha S Reddy; David R Topor
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  The uneasy alliance of assessment and feedback.

Authors:  Christopher Watling
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-10

6.  On the issue of costs in programmatic assessment.

Authors:  Cees P M van der Vleuten; Sylvia Heeneman
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-10

7.  Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm.

Authors:  Christopher J Harrison; Karen D Könings; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Valerie Wass; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Which Factors Are Associated with Monitoring Goal Progress?

Authors:  Betty P I Chang; Thomas L Webb; Yael Benn; Chris B Stride
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-24

9.  Between trust and control: Teachers' assessment conceptualisations within programmatic assessment.

Authors:  Suzanne Schut; Sylvia Heeneman; Beth Bierer; Erik Driessen; Jan van Tartwijk; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Factors influencing students' receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures.

Authors:  Christopher J Harrison; Karen D Könings; Elaine F Dannefer; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Valerie Wass; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.