Literature DB >> 24905402

Variation in general practice prostate-specific antigen testing and prostate cancer outcomes: an ecological study.

Peter Hjertholm1, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Mogens Vestergaard, Morten B Christensen, Michael Borre, Henrik Møller, Peter Vedsted.   

Abstract

Knowledge is sparse about the consequences of variation in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in general practice. This study investigated associations between PSA testing and prostate cancer- related outcomes in Danish general practice, where screening for prostate cancer is not recommended. National registers were used to divide general practices into four groups based on their adjusted PSA test rate 2004-2009. We analysed associations between PSA test rate and prostate cancer-related outcomes using Poisson regression adjusted for potential confounders. We included 368 general practices, 303,098 men and 4,199 incident prostate cancers. Men in the highest testing quartile of practices compared to men in the lowest quartile had increased risk of trans-rectal ultrasound (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.20, 95% CI, 0.95-1.51), biopsy (IRR: 1.76, 95% CI, 1.54-2.02), and getting a prostate cancer diagnosis (IRR: 1.37, 95% CI, 1.23-1.52). More were diagnosed with local stage disease (IRR: 1.61, 95% CI, 1.37-1.89) with no differences regarding regional or distant stage. The IRR for prostatectomy was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.72-2.94) and 1.28 (95% CI, 1.02-1.62) for radiotherapy. No differences in prostate cancer or overall mortality were found between the groups. These results show that the highest PSA testing general practices may not reduce prostate cancer mortality but increase the downstream use of diagnostic and surgical procedures with potentially harmful side effects.
© 2014 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  general practice; neoplasm; primary health care; prostate neoplasms; prostate-specific antigen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24905402     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  12 in total

1.  The elusive diagnosis of cancer: testing times.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Rafael Perera; Matthew J Thompson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  What explains the differences between centres in the European screening trial? A simulation study.

Authors:  Jaakko Nevalainen; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Teuvo L Tammela; Monique Roobol; Sigrid Carlsson; Kirsi Talala; Fritz H Schröder; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Trends in prostate biopsy in Ontario, 1992-2014: a cohort study.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée; Rodney H Breau; Dean Fergusson; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-11-21

4.  Tumour stage and implementation of standardised cancer patient pathways: a comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Henry Jensen; Marie Louise Tørring; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Frede Olesen; Jens Overgaard; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Prostate-specific antigen testing in inner London general practices: are those at higher risk most likely to get tested?

Authors:  Paul Nderitu; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Mark Ashworth; Rohini Mathur; Sally Hull; Alexandra Dudek; Simon Chowdhury
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Knowledge or noise? Making sense of General Practitioners' and Consultant use of 2-week-wait referrals for suspected cancer.

Authors:  Conan Donnelly; Nigel Hart; Alan David McCrorie; Lesley Anderson; Michael Donnelly; Peter Murchie; Anna Gavin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential.

Authors:  Morten Schmidt; Sigrun Alba Johannesdottir Schmidt; Jakob Lynge Sandegaard; Vera Ehrenstein; Lars Pedersen; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Downstream tests, treatments, and annual direct payments in older men cared for by primary care providers with high or low prostate-specific antigen screening rates using 100 percent Texas U.S. Medicare public insurance claims data: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Preeti Zanwar; Yu-Li Lin; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Association of GPs' risk attitudes, level of empathy, and burnout status with PSA testing in primary care.

Authors:  Anette F Pedersen; Anders H Carlsen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Attitudes Toward and Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Among Urologists and General Practitioners in Germany: A Survey.

Authors:  Sanny Kappen; Verena Jürgens; Michael H Freitag; Alexander Winter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.