| Literature DB >> 24904682 |
Jennifer Brown1, Harold Burger2, Barbara Weiser2, Richard B Pollard1, Xiao-Dong Li2, Lynell J Clancy1, Russell E Baumann3, Amy A Rogers3, Hasnah B Hamdan3, Rick L Pesano3, Ron M Kagan3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV-1 coreceptor tropism testing is used to evaluate eligibility for CCR5 antagonist therapy. However, HIV-1 RNA-based tests are not suitable for virologically suppressed patients, therefore the use of proviral DNA tropism testing has been investigated. We describe a novel proviral DNA-based genotypic tropism assay and compare its performance to that of a sensitive HIV-1 RNA-based genotypic test.Entities:
Keywords: HIV-1 diagnostic tests; HIV-1 proviral tropism; HIV-1 tropism
Year: 2014 PMID: 24904682 PMCID: PMC4045881 DOI: 10.1186/1742-6405-11-14
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Res Ther ISSN: 1742-6405 Impact factor: 2.250
Tropism prediction concordance between 3 proviral DNA (pvDNA) sample types and plasma RNA in paired samples from 41 HIV-1 positive patients
| Whole blood (Tube 1a) | 17 (41) | 14 (34) | 93% | 100% | 89% | 0.85 |
| PBMCs (Tube 2b) | 16 (39) | 14 (34) | 95% | 100% | 93% | 0.90 |
| PBMCs + Plasma (Tube 3) | 15 (37) | 14 (34) | 98% | 100% | 96% | 0.95 |
aSensitivity is defined as concordant X4 results between the test and reference methods/reference method X4s.
bSpecificity is defined as concordant R5 results between the test and reference methods/reference method R5s.
cKappa: a measure of inter-rater agreement: 0.41-0.60: moderate agreement; 0.61-0.80: good agreement; 0.81 – 1.0 excellent agreement.
dPlasma RNA testing was used as the reference method for all proviral DNA tests.
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of four samples with discordant tropism results. A: samples 49 and 45. B: samples 34 and 35. Circles: V3 sequences from RNA; triangles: pvDNA V3 sequences from whole blood; squares: pvDNA V3 sequences from PBMCs.
Figure 2Laboratory analysis of study samples. Samples were collected and prepared for tropism analysis as described in Methods.
Proviral DNA tropism assay performance characteristics
| Specimen type | Whole blood | PBMC | Whole blood | PBMC | Whole blood | PBMC |
| Tropism concordance3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | N/A | N/A |
| DNA sequence concordance4 | 98.9% | 98.9% | 99.0% | 98.6% | N/A | N/A |
| DNA copies/mL | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 480 | 360 |
1Three replicates of 3 clinical samples were tested in a single run. Two samples were classified as R5 and one was classified as X4.
2Three replicates of 3 clinical samples were tested on 3 different days in 3 runs. Two samples were classified as R5 and one was classified as X4.
3The tropism classifications for all replicates were 100% concordant with the original R5 or X4 classification.
4Nucleotide sequences for the replicates were compared to the consensus sequence and differences were tabulated. Mixed base calls (K, M, R, S, W, Y) accounted for the differences.
5The sensitivity standards were prepared by diluting purified, quantitated 963 bp HIV-1 proviral DNA amplicons in HIV-1 negative human whole blood or plasma and the LOD95 values were determined by probit analysis.