BACKGROUND: Although combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) dramatically reduces rates of AIDS and death, a minority of patients experience clinical disease progression during treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether detection of CXCR4(X4)-specific strains or quantification of X4-specific HIV-1 load predict clinical outcome. METHODS: From the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, 96 participants who initiated cART yet subsequently progressed to AIDS or death were compared with 84 contemporaneous, treated nonprogressors. A sensitive heteroduplex tracking assay was developed to quantify plasma X4 and CCR5 variants and resolve HIV-1 load into coreceptor-specific components. Measurements were analyzed as cofactors of progression in multivariable Cox models adjusted for concurrent CD4 cell count and total viral load, applying inverse probability weights to adjust for sampling bias. RESULTS: Patients with X4 variants at baseline displayed reduced CD4 cell responses compared with those without X4 strains (40 versus 82 cells/microl; P = 0.012). The adjusted multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for clinical progression was 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-10.0] for those demonstrating X4 strains at baseline. The X4-specific HIV-1 load was a similarly independent predictor, with HR values of 3.7 (95% CI, 1.2-11.3) and 5.9 (95% CI, 2.2-15.0) for baseline loads of 2.2-4.3 and > 4.3 log10 copies/ml, respectively, compared with < 2.2 log10 copies/ml. CONCLUSIONS: HIV-1 coreceptor usage and X4-specific viral loads strongly predicted disease progression during cART, independent of and in addition to CD4 cell count or total viral load. Detection and quantification of X4 strains promise to be clinically useful biomarkers to guide patient management and study HIV-1 pathogenesis.
BACKGROUND: Although combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) dramatically reduces rates of AIDS and death, a minority of patients experience clinical disease progression during treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether detection of CXCR4(X4)-specific strains or quantification of X4-specific HIV-1 load predict clinical outcome. METHODS: From the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, 96 participants who initiated cART yet subsequently progressed to AIDS or death were compared with 84 contemporaneous, treated nonprogressors. A sensitive heteroduplex tracking assay was developed to quantify plasma X4 and CCR5 variants and resolve HIV-1 load into coreceptor-specific components. Measurements were analyzed as cofactors of progression in multivariable Cox models adjusted for concurrent CD4 cell count and total viral load, applying inverse probability weights to adjust for sampling bias. RESULTS:Patients with X4 variants at baseline displayed reduced CD4 cell responses compared with those without X4 strains (40 versus 82 cells/microl; P = 0.012). The adjusted multivariable hazard ratio (HR) for clinical progression was 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-10.0] for those demonstrating X4 strains at baseline. The X4-specific HIV-1 load was a similarly independent predictor, with HR values of 3.7 (95% CI, 1.2-11.3) and 5.9 (95% CI, 2.2-15.0) for baseline loads of 2.2-4.3 and > 4.3 log10 copies/ml, respectively, compared with < 2.2 log10 copies/ml. CONCLUSIONS:HIV-1 coreceptor usage and X4-specific viral loads strongly predicted disease progression during cART, independent of and in addition to CD4 cell count or total viral load. Detection and quantification of X4 strains promise to be clinically useful biomarkers to guide patient management and study HIV-1 pathogenesis.
Authors: Binshan Shi; Christina Kitchen; Barbara Weiser; Douglas Mayers; Brian Foley; Kimdar Kemal; Kathryn Anastos; Marc Suchard; Monica Parker; Cheryl Brunner; Harold Burger Journal: Virology Date: 2010-05-08 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Silvia Baroncelli; Clementina Maria Galluzzo; Liliana Elena Weimer; Maria Franca Pirillo; Anna Volpe; Alessandra Mercuri; Albertina Cavalli; Vincenzo Fragola; Laura Monno; Anna Degli Antoni; Nicoletta Ladisa; Daniela Francisci; Raffaella Bucciardini; Marco Floridia Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Michelle B Kim; Kyle E Giesler; Yesim A Tahirovic; Valarie M Truax; Dennis C Liotta; Lawrence J Wilson Journal: Expert Opin Investig Drugs Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 6.206
Authors: Richard W Price; Serena S Spudich; Julia Peterson; Sarah Joseph; Dietmar Fuchs; Henrik Zetterberg; Magnus Gisslén; Ronald Swanstrom Journal: Semin Neurol Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 3.420
Authors: Malavika S Giri; Michael Nebozyhn; Andrea Raymond; Bethsebah Gekonge; Aidan Hancock; Shenoa Creer; Calen Nicols; Malik Yousef; Andrea S Foulkes; Karam Mounzer; Jane Shull; Guido Silvestri; Jay Kostman; Ronald G Collman; Louise Showe; Luis J Montaner Journal: J Immunol Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Ron M Kagan; Erik P Johnson; Martin F Siaw; Ben Van Baelen; Richard Ogden; Jamie L Platt; Rick L Pesano; Eric Lefebvre Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 2.205