OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder is associated with idiosyncratic precursors of clinically important states such as suicidal ideation. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) - high frequency data collection in a subject's usual environment - provides the potential for development of temporal, individualized prediction of risk states. The present study tested the ability of EMA data to predict individual symptom change in clinician-rated suicidal ideation. METHODS: Thirty-five adults diagnosed with inter-episode bipolar disorder completed daily measures of affect in their home environments using diaries administered over an eight-week assessment timeline. Suicidal ideation was assessed monthly at in-person visits using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated. We used a novel application of functional linear models (FLMs) to generate prospective predictions of suicidal ideation at in-person clinician assessments based on intensively sampled trajectories of daily affect. RESULTS: Eight instances of suicidal ideation scores > 0 were recorded during the study period on six participants. Utilizing trajectories of negative and positive affect, cross-validated predictions attained 88% sensitivity with 95% specificity for elevated suicidal ideation one week prior to in-person clinician assessment. This model strongly outperformed prediction models using cross-sectional data obtained at study visits alone. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing EMA data with FLM prediction models substantially increases the accuracy of prediction of study-emergent suicidal ideation. Prediction algorithms employing intensively sampled longitudinal EMA data could sensitively detect the warning signs of suicidal ideation to facilitate improved suicide risk assessment and the timely delivery of preventative interventions.
OBJECTIVES:Bipolar disorder is associated with idiosyncratic precursors of clinically important states such as suicidal ideation. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) - high frequency data collection in a subject's usual environment - provides the potential for development of temporal, individualized prediction of risk states. The present study tested the ability of EMA data to predict individual symptom change in clinician-rated suicidal ideation. METHODS: Thirty-five adults diagnosed with inter-episode bipolar disorder completed daily measures of affect in their home environments using diaries administered over an eight-week assessment timeline. Suicidal ideation was assessed monthly at in-person visits using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated. We used a novel application of functional linear models (FLMs) to generate prospective predictions of suicidal ideation at in-person clinician assessments based on intensively sampled trajectories of daily affect. RESULTS: Eight instances of suicidal ideation scores > 0 were recorded during the study period on six participants. Utilizing trajectories of negative and positive affect, cross-validated predictions attained 88% sensitivity with 95% specificity for elevated suicidal ideation one week prior to in-person clinician assessment. This model strongly outperformed prediction models using cross-sectional data obtained at study visits alone. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing EMA data with FLM prediction models substantially increases the accuracy of prediction of study-emergent suicidal ideation. Prediction algorithms employing intensively sampled longitudinal EMA data could sensitively detect the warning signs of suicidal ideation to facilitate improved suicide risk assessment and the timely delivery of preventative interventions.
Authors: Colin A Depp; Brent Mausbach; Eric Granholm; Veronica Cardenas; Dror Ben-Zeev; Thomas L Patterson; Barry D Lebowitz; Dilip V Jeste Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: J B Williams; M Gibbon; M B First; R L Spitzer; M Davies; J Borus; M J Howes; J Kane; H G Pope; B Rounsaville Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1992-08
Authors: Gil Zalsman; Melanie Braun; Mikkel Arendt; Michael F Grunebaum; Leo Sher; Ainsley K Burke; David A Brent; Sadia R Chaudhury; J John Mann; Maria A Oquendo Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Lewis L Judd; Hagop S Akiskal; Pamela J Schettler; William Coryell; Jean Endicott; Jack D Maser; David A Solomon; Andrew C Leon; Martin B Keller Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2003-03
Authors: Tina R Goldstein; Wonho Ha; David A Axelson; Benjamin I Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Mary Kay Gill; Neal D Ryan; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey Hunt; Heather Hower; Martin Keller; Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2012-11
Authors: Beate Wild; Michael Eichler; Hans-Christoph Friederich; Mechthild Hartmann; Stephan Zipfel; Wolfgang Herzog Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: John Torous; Mark E Larsen; Colin Depp; Theodore D Cosco; Ian Barnett; Matthew K Nock; Joe Firth Journal: Curr Psychiatry Rep Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 5.285
Authors: Michael J Ostacher; Andrew A Nierenberg; Dustin Rabideau; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Louisa G Sylvia; Alexandra K Gold; Leah W Shesler; Terence A Ketter; Charles L Bowden; Joseph R Calabrese; Edward S Friedman; Dan V Iosifescu; Michael E Thase; Andrew C Leon; Madhukar H Trivedi Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Matthew Price; Katherine van Stolk-Cooke; Hannah L Ward; Michael O'Keefe; Jennifer Gratton; Christian Skalka; Kalev Freeman Journal: J Technol Behav Sci Date: 2017-01-11
Authors: Lily A Brown; Emily Wakschal; Stefanie Russman-Block; Christina L Boisseau; Maria C Mancebo; Jane L Eisen; Steven A Rasmussen Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Philip D Harvey; Michelle L Miller; Raeanne C Moore; Colin A Depp; Emma M Parrish; Amy E Pinkham Journal: Innov Clin Neurosci Date: 2021-01-01