Literature DB >> 24903744

GFAP out-performs S100β in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury and those with extracranial lesions.

Linda Papa1, Salvatore Silvestri, Gretchen M Brophy, Philip Giordano, Jay L Falk, Carolina F Braga, Ciara N Tan, Neema J Ameli, Jason A Demery, Neha K Dixit, Matthew E Mendes, Ronald L Hayes, Kevin K W Wang, Claudia S Robertson.   

Abstract

Both glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S100β are found in glial cells and are released into serum following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), however, the clinical utility of S100β as a biomarker has been questioned because of its release from bone. This study examined the ability of GFAP and S100β to detect intracranial lesions on computed tomography (CT) in trauma patients and also assessed biomarker performance in patients with fractures and extracranial injuries on head CT. This prospective cohort study enrolled a convenience sample of adult trauma patients at a Level I trauma center with and without mild or moderate traumatic brain injury (MMTBI). Serum samples were obtained within 4 h of injury. The primary outcome was the presence of traumatic intracranial lesions on CT scan. There were 397 general trauma patients enrolled: 209 (53%) had a MMTBI and 188 (47%) had trauma without MMTBI. Of the 262 patients with a head CT, 20 (8%) had intracranial lesions. There were 137 (35%) trauma patients who sustained extracranial fractures below the head to the torso and extremities. Levels of S100β were significantly higher in patients with fractures, compared with those without fractures (p<0.001) whether MMTBI was present or not. However, GFAP levels were not significantly affected by the presence of fractures (p>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for predicting intracranial lesions on CT for GFAP was 0.84 (0.73-0.95) and for S100β was 0.78 (0.67-0.89). However, in the presence of extracranial fractures, the AUC for GFAP increased to 0.93 (0.86-1.00) and for S100β decreased to 0.75 (0.61-0.88). In a general trauma population, GFAP out-performed S100β in detecting intracranial CT lesions, particularly in the setting of extracranial fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  S100β; computed tomography (CT); fractures; glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP); mild traumatic brain injury/concussion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24903744      PMCID: PMC4224051          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2013.3245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  31 in total

1.  GFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  P E Vos; B Jacobs; T M J C Andriessen; K J B Lamers; G F Borm; T Beems; M Edwards; C F Rosmalen; J L M Vissers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Neuron-specific enolase, S100B, and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels as outcome predictors in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ana Elisa Böhmer; Jean Pierre Oses; André Prato Schmidt; Cleiton Schweister Perón; Claudio Liss Krebs; Paulo Petry Oppitz; Thiago Torres D'Avila; Diogo Onofre Souza; Luis Valmor Portela; Marco Antonio Stefani
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Biomarker-based dissection of neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Bob Olsson; Henrik Zetterberg; Harald Hampel; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 4.  Biomarkers of primary and evolving damage in traumatic and ischemic brain injury: diagnosis, prognosis, probing mechanisms, and therapeutic decision making.

Authors:  Patrick M Kochanek; Rachel P Berger; Hülya Bayir; Amy K Wagner; Larry W Jenkins; Robert S B Clark
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.687

5.  Relationship of serum S100B levels and intracranial injury in children with closed head trauma.

Authors:  Kirsten Bechtel; Sarah Frasure; Clement Marshall; James Dziura; Christine Simpson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein is a highly specific biomarker for traumatic brain injury in humans compared with S-100B and neuron-specific enolase.

Authors:  Masahiro Honda; Ryosuke Tsuruta; Tadashi Kaneko; Shunji Kasaoka; Takeshi Yagi; Masaki Todani; Motoki Fujita; Tomonori Izumi; Tsuyoshi Maekawa
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-07

7.  S100B serum level predicts computed tomography findings after minor head injury.

Authors:  Kay Müller; Will Townend; Nicola Biasca; Johan Undén; Knut Waterloo; Bertil Romner; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-06

8.  Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting.

Authors:  Andy S Jagoda; Jeffrey J Bazarian; John J Bruns; Stephen V Cantrill; Alisa D Gean; Patricia Kunz Howard; Jamshid Ghajar; Silvana Riggio; David W Wright; Robert L Wears; Aric Bakshy; Paula Burgess; Marlena M Wald; Rhonda R Whitson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Neuronal and glial markers are differently associated with computed tomography findings and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a case control study.

Authors:  Stefania Mondello; Linda Papa; Andras Buki; M Ross Bullock; Endre Czeiter; Frank C Tortella; Kevin K Wang; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Systematic review of clinical research on biomarkers for pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Michelle M Ramia; Jared M Kelly; Stephen S Burks; Artur Pawlowicz; Rachel P Berger
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.269

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  Fluid biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury and related conditions.

Authors:  Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Current status of fluid biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Kulbe; James W Geddes
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Raising the Bar for Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarker Research: Methods Make a Difference.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Kevin K W Wang
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Correlation of Blood Biomarkers and Biomarker Panels with Traumatic Findings on Computed Tomography after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jussi P Posti; Riikka S K Takala; Linnéa Lagerstedt; Alex M Dickens; Iftakher Hossain; Mehrbod Mohammadian; Henna Ala-Seppälä; Janek Frantzén; Mark van Gils; Peter J Hutchinson; Ari J Katila; Henna-Riikka Maanpää; David K Menon; Virginia F Newcombe; Jussi Tallus; Kevin Hrusovsky; David H Wilson; Jessica Gill; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Olli Tenovuo; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Prospective evaluation of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) as a diagnostic marker for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Julia Tichy; Sabrina Spechtmeyer; Michel Mittelbronn; Elke Hattingen; Johannes Rieger; Christian Senft; Christian Foerch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Systematic review of clinical studies examining biomarkers of brain injury in athletes after sports-related concussion.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Michelle M Ramia; Damyan Edwards; Brian D Johnson; Semyon M Slobounov
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 7.  Proteomic and biomarker studies and neurological complications of pediatric sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Eboni I Lance; James F Casella; Allen D Everett; Emily Barron-Casella
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Are UCH-L1 and GFAP promising biomarkers for children with mild traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Tara Rhine; Lynn Babcock; Nanhua Zhang; James Leach; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Potential Blood-based Biomarkers for Concussion.

Authors:  Linda Papa
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 10.  Protein biomarkers of epileptogenicity after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Denes V Agoston; Alaa Kamnaksh
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.