Literature DB >> 24903125

Multiscale fluid-structure interaction modelling to determine the mechanical stimulation of bone cells in a tissue engineered scaffold.

Feihu Zhao1, Ted J Vaughan, Laoise M Mcnamara.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that mechanical stimulation, by means of flow perfusion and mechanical compression (or stretching), enhances osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and bone cells within biomaterial scaffolds in vitro. However, the precise mechanisms by which such stimulation enhances bone regeneration is not yet fully understood. Previous computational studies have sought to characterise the mechanical stimulation on cells within biomaterial scaffolds using either computational fluid dynamics or finite element (FE) approaches. However, the physical environment within a scaffold under perfusion is extremely complex and requires a multiscale and multiphysics approach to study the mechanical stimulation of cells. In this study, we seek to determine the mechanical stimulation of osteoblasts seeded in a biomaterial scaffold under flow perfusion and mechanical compression using multiscale modelling by two-way fluid-structure interaction and FE approaches. The mechanical stimulation, in terms of wall shear stress (WSS) and strain in osteoblasts, is quantified at different locations within the scaffold for cells of different attachment morphologies (attached, bridged). The results show that 75.4 % of scaffold surface has a WSS of 0.1-10 mPa, which indicates the likelihood of bone cell differentiation at these locations. For attached and bridged osteoblasts, the maximum strains are 397 and 177,200 με, respectively. Additionally, the results from mechanical compression show that attached cells are more stimulated (maximum strain = 22,600 με) than bridged cells (maximum strain = 10.000 με)Such information is important for understanding the biological response of osteoblasts under in vitro stimulation. Finally, a combination of perfusion and compression of a tissue engineering scaffold is suggested for osteogenic differentiation.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24903125     DOI: 10.1007/s10237-014-0599-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol        ISSN: 1617-7940


  12 in total

1.  Ex vivo loading of trussed implants for spine fusion induces heterogeneous strains consistent with homeostatic bone mechanobiology.

Authors:  Jason P Caffrey; Esther Cory; Van W Wong; Koichi Masuda; Albert C Chen; Jessee P Hunt; Timothy M Ganey; Robert L Sah
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  In silico bone mechanobiology: modeling a multifaceted biological system.

Authors:  Mario Giorgi; Stefaan W Verbruggen; Damien Lacroix
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2016-09-07

Review 3.  New Bioengineering Breakthroughs and Enabling Tools in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Alvaro Mata; Helena S Azevedo; Lorenzo Botto; Nuria Gavara; Lei Su
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2017-05-04

4.  Influence of Additive Manufactured Scaffold Architecture on the Distribution of Surface Strains and Fluid Flow Shear Stresses and Expected Osteochondral Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  Wim J Hendrikson; Anthony J Deegan; Ying Yang; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Nico Verdonschot; Lorenzo Moroni; Jeroen Rouwkema
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Micromechanical study of the load transfer in a polycaprolactone-collagen hybrid scaffold when subjected to unconfined and confined compression.

Authors:  A P G Castro; D Lacroix
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-11-11

6.  Changes in scaffold porosity during bone tissue engineering in perfusion bioreactors considerably affect cellular mechanical stimulation for mineralization.

Authors:  Feihu Zhao; Damien Lacroix; Keita Ito; Bert van Rietbergen; Sandra Hofmann
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-04-08

7.  Fluid flow-induced cell stimulation in bone tissue engineering changes due to interstitial tissue formation in vitro.

Authors:  Feihu Zhao; Bert van Rietbergen; Keita Ito; Sandra Hofmann
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Osteochondral tissue coculture: An in vitro and in silico approach.

Authors:  Ruikang Xue; Benedict Chung; Maryam Tamaddon; James Carr; Chaozong Liu; Sarah Harriet Cartmell
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Finite element study of stem cells under fluid flow for mechanoregulation toward osteochondral cells.

Authors:  Mehdi Moradkhani; Bahman Vahidi; Bahram Ahmadian
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Application of quality by design for 3D printed bone prostheses and scaffolds.

Authors:  Daniel Martinez-Marquez; Ali Mirnajafizadeh; Christopher P Carty; Rodney A Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.