Literature DB >> 24902533

[Bioethics in medical institutions--new custom or help? The example of clinical ethics consultation at a University Medical Center].

G Richter1.   

Abstract

Although ethics committees are well established in the medical sciences for human clinical trials, animal research and scientific integrity, the development of clinical ethics in German hospitals started much later during the first decade of the twenty-first century. Clinical ethics consultation should be pragmatic and problem-centered and can be defined as an ethically qualified and informed conflict management within a given legal framework to deal with and resolve value-driven, normative problems in the care of patients. Clinical ethics consultations enable shared clinical decision-making of all parties (e.g. clinicians, patients, family and surrogates) involved in a particular patient's care. The clinical ethicist does not act as an ethics expert by making independent recommendations or decisions; therefore, the focus is different from other medical consultants. Ethics consultation was first established by healthcare ethics committees (HEC) or clinical ethics consultation (CEC) groups which were called in to respond to an ethically problematic situation. To avoid ethical dilemmas or crises and to act preventively with regard to ethical issues in individual patients, an ethics liaison service is an additional option to ethics case consultations which take place on a regular basis by scheduled ethics rounds during the normal ward rounds. The presence of the ethicist offers some unique advantages: it allows early recognition of even minor ethical problems and accommodates the dynamics of ethical and clinical goal-setting in the course of patient care. Most importantly, regular and non-authoritative participation of the ethicist in normal ward rounds allows continuous ethical education of the staff within the everyday clinical routine. By facilitating clinical ethical decision-making, the ethicist seeks to empower physicians and medical staff to deal appropriately with ethical problems by themselves. Because of this proactive approach, the ethics liaison service can make a significant contribution to preventative ethics in reducing the number of emerging ethical problems to the satisfaction of all parties involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24902533     DOI: 10.1007/s00059-014-4114-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herz        ISSN: 0340-9937            Impact factor:   1.443


  10 in total

1.  Why don't physicians use ethics consultation?

Authors:  L Davies; L D Hudson
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1999

2.  Ethics consultation at the University Medical Center--Marburg.

Authors:  G Richter
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2001-09

3.  Facilitating medical ethics case review: what ethics committees can learn from mediation and facilitation techniques.

Authors:  M B West; J M Gibson
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Joining the team: ethics consultation at the Cleveland Clinic.

Authors:  George J Agich
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-12

5.  Why doctors use or do not use ethics consultation.

Authors:  J P Orlowski; S Hein; J A Christensen; R Meinke; T Sincich
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Residents' access to ethics consultations: knowledge, use, and perceptions.

Authors:  Jessica Gacki-Smith; Elisa J Gordon
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Rounding: how everyday ethics can invigorate a hospital's ethics committee.

Authors:  Evan G Derenzo; Nneka Mokwunye; John J Lynch
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-12

8.  Greater patient, family and surrogate involvement in clinical ethics consultation: the model of clinical ethics liaison service as a measure for preventive ethics.

Authors:  Gerd Richter
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-12

9.  Experiential learning in clinical ethics consultation.

Authors:  Thomas Morgenstern; Gerd Richter
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 10.  Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Douglas B White
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.410

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Ethics Consultations in the Opinion of Polish Physicians.

Authors:  Marek Czarkowski; Joanna Różyńska; Bartosz Maćkiewicz; Jakub Zawiła-Niedźwiecki
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 1.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.