Literature DB >> 14976686

Joining the team: ethics consultation at the Cleveland Clinic.

George J Agich1.   

Abstract

In this paper, I describe the development of ethics consultation services and their operation at the Cleveland Clinic; my own educational experiences and background and how I came to see the importance of setting and collaboration for successfully doing clinical ethics; the unique culture of the Cleveland Clinic and its influence on the ethics consultation services provided there; and, finally, the place of personal commitments and values on the conduct of ethics consultations. I stress the point that although philosophers (and perhaps other bioethicists without health professions training) are socialized and educated to do solitary work, successfully conducting ethics consultations requires relatively high levels of collaboration and cooperation that have not been sufficiently discussed. Although this paper is more a description than an analysis of the influence of institutional setting on ethics consultation, I would claim that attention to setting, either as the local scene of the consultation or the institutional and social framework, deserves more attention by bioethicists intent on understanding ethics consultation.

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Cleveland Clinic

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14976686     DOI: 10.1023/b:hecf.0000011973.18422.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  10 in total

1.  Why physicians should not do ethics consults.

Authors:  F H Marsh
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1992-09

2.  Reflections of a reluctant clinical ethicist: ethics consultation and the collapse of critical distance.

Authors:  D Barnard
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1992-03

3.  Why philosophers should offer ethics consultations.

Authors:  D C Thomasma
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1991-06

4.  Non-MD ethics consultants?

Authors:  G B Grunfeld
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1990

5.  Keeping moral space open. New images of ethics consulting.

Authors:  M U Walker
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Ethics consultation: the least dangerous profession?

Authors:  G R Scofield
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Ethics and experts.

Authors:  C N Noble
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Ethics and Experts. 3. Ethicists, critics and expertise.

Authors:  D Wikler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Cautionary advice for humanists.

Authors:  M Siegler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.683

10.  Avoiding "Cloudcuckooland" in ethics committee case review: matching models to issues and concerns.

Authors:  Cynthia B Cohen
Journal:  Law Med Health Care       Date:  1992
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Greater patient, family and surrogate involvement in clinical ethics consultation: the model of clinical ethics liaison service as a measure for preventive ethics.

Authors:  Gerd Richter
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-12

2.  Defense mechanisms in ethics consultation.

Authors:  George J Agich
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2011-12

3.  Beyond trail blazing: a roadmap for new healthcare ethics leaders (and the people who hire them).

Authors:  Cheryl Cline; Andrea Frolic; Robert Sibbald
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-09

Review 4.  [Bioethics in medical institutions--new custom or help? The example of clinical ethics consultation at a University Medical Center].

Authors:  G Richter
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Education and the improvement of clinical ethics services.

Authors:  George J Agich
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.463

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.